Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-52778 — yeswiki/yeswiki

CRITICALFix: YesWiki/yeswiki@dd2bd8f

CVE-2026-52778 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Code Injection vulnerability in yeswiki/yeswiki. A fix is available for yeswiki/yeswiki — see the affected versions and patch details below.

YesWiki has Unsafe eval() in Formula Calculator - Remote Code Execution (RCE) & Denial of Service (DoS)

Also known asGHSA-px5m-h76g-p7p8
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-52778.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.9%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs60th percentile — riskier than 60% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.06%0.52%0.98%1.44%0.6%0.6%0.6%0.9%0.9%Jul 26Sep 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-52778 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 383,485 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘yeswiki/yeswiki

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

An unsafe execution vulnerability exists in the Bazar form field calculator (CalcField.php) of YesWiki. The application attempts to sanitize user-defined mathematical formulas using a complex recursive regular expression before passing them to the PHP eval() function. This implementation is inherently flawed: it is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS / Stack Overflow) which can crash the server, and it creates a high-risk architecture where any logic bypass directly results in arbitrary PHP code execution.

Details

Affected Component

  • File: tools/bazar/fields/CalcField.php
  • Method: formatValuesBeforeSave($entry)
  • Vulnerable Mechanism: Combination of a complex recursive regex validation followed by eval().

The code attempts to implement a sandbox for mathematical operations by verifying the formula structure before executing it:

$regexpToCheckIfMathFormula = '/^((' . $number . '|' . $functions . '\s*\((?1)+\)|\((?1)+\))(?:' . $operators . '(?1))?)+$/';

if (preg_match($regexpToCheckIfMathFormula, $formula)) {
    $formula = preg_replace('!pi|π!', 'pi()', $formula);
    try {
        eval("\$value = $formula;");  // VULNERABLE LINE
// ...

Architectural Flaws

PCRE Stack Overflow & ReDoS (The Immediate Exploit):

The regex definition heavily relies on a recursive pattern (?1)+. In PHP's PCRE engine, deeply nested recursive patterns are processed on the system stack. If an attacker inputs a formula with thousands of nested parentheses or repeating groups, the engine will either trigger a pcre.recursion_limit exhaust (returning false or null) or cause a Segmentation Fault, instantly crashing the PHP process (Denial of Service).

The "Validation-Before-Substitution" Trap:

The regex checks the $formula variable after it has tokenized and reassembled the input string. If any underlying function called during tokenization (like testEntryValue or future updates to getEntryValue) returns or leaks an unexpected string format, the string structure changes.

Complete Trust in eval():

Using eval() as a math parser means the application's security perimeter relies entirely on a single regular expression. History shows that complex regex sanitizers for script evaluation are consistently bypassed via edge-case syntaxes, character encoding tricks, or PCRE engine bugs.

PoC

Scenario A: Remote Denial of Service (Server Crash)

An attacker with rights to create or edit a Bazar form adds a Calc field and injects a deeply nested recursive mathematical structure.

Payload:

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((1+1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

(Multiplied by 2000 to 5000 iterations depending on the server's pcre.recursion_limit and stack configuration).

The PCRE engine runs out of stack memory, leading to an immediate crash of the PHP-FPM worker or Apache process handling the request, rendering the service unavailable.

Scenario B: Logical Bypass to RCE

Because eval() executes raw PHP code, if an attacker successfully fuzzes the recursive pattern or exploits an unpatched vulnerability in the specific PCRE library version installed on the host OS, they can slip a PHP payload through the validation block.

Payload:

abs(1) + system('id')

If a validation bypass occurs, the string evaluates as native PHP, granting the attacker the privileges of the www-data (web server) user, leading to a full host compromise.

Impact

  • Confidentiality: HIGH. Attackers can read sensitive system files (e.g., /etc/passwd, .env configuration files).

  • Integrity: HIGH. Attackers can modify application files, inject backdoors, or alter the database content.

  • Availability: HIGH. Attackers can easily bring down the web service via the ReDoS/Segmentation Fault vector.

Remediation & Mitigation

  • Do not use regular expressions to safe-guard eval(). Instead, replace the execution block with a dedicated, safe Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) math parser or an expression language component that cannot execute system context.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistyeswiki/yeswikiall versions4.6.6composer require yeswiki/yeswiki:^4.6.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for yeswiki/yeswiki, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update yeswiki/yeswiki to 4.6.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-52778 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary An unsafe execution vulnerability exists in the Bazar form field calculator (CalcField.php) of YesWiki. The application attempts to sanitize user-defined mathematical formulas using a complex recursive regular expression before passing them to the PHP eval() function. This implementation is inherently flawed: it is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS / Stack Overflow) which can crash the server, and it creates a high-risk architecture where any logic bypass directly results in arbitrary PHP code execution. ### Details Affected Component - **File**: tools/ba
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-52778 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-52778: RCE — Fixed in 4.6.6 | O3 Security