CVE-2026-49856
MEDIUMCVE-2026-49856 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in @jshookmcp/jshook. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-49856 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
@jshookmcp/jshook: ICMP probe and traceroute skip local-network SSRF authorization
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-49856.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@jshookmcp/jshooknpmDescription
Summary
The network domain has a central SSRF authorization policy that blocks private, loopback, link-local, and reserved targets unless an explicit authorization object allows private network access. The policy is enforced by raw HTTP/TCP/TLS RTT tools, but the ICMP probe and traceroute tools resolve the target and invoke the native ICMP/traceroute sink directly.
An MCP client with access to an active network domain can therefore ask the jshookmcp server to probe internal addresses such as 10.0.0.1 even when local SSRF access is disabled for the other raw network tools. This exposes an internal reachability and route mapping primitive from the server network position.
Affected code
Current main https://github.com/vmoranv/jshookmcp/commit/d309c395738638e384c28c0f599b47b2213ab595 and npm package @jshookmcp/jshook 0.3.1 both contain the issue.
- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:61-66: network_rtt_measure parses optional authorization and calls resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget before probing.
- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:185-190: network_latency_stats uses the same authorization guard.
- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:123-139: network_traceroute resolves target with resolveHostname and calls traceroute without an authorization policy check.
- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:240-257: network_icmp_probe resolves target with resolveHostname and calls icmpProbe without an authorization policy check.
- src/server/domains/network/handlers/raw-latency-handlers.ts:408-416: resolveHostname returns IPv4 literals directly and otherwise performs DNS A lookup without checking private, loopback, link-local, or reserved ranges.
- src/utils/network/ssrf-policy.ts:244-316: the central policy blocks private targets unless explicit authorization or ALLOW_LOCAL_SSRF=true is set.
Reproduction
Used a focused regression test against the real handleCallTool and RawHandlers call path with fake native ICMP and policy sinks. The test does not send external traffic. It proves the denied control and the bypass through the same MCP meta-tool dispatch path.
Test file path in my local checkout:
tests/server/security/jshookmcp-network-meta-boundary.test.ts
Relevant test body:
it('denied control: RTT path consults the SSRF authorization guard for private targets', async () => {
const handler = new RawHandlers();
state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget.mockRejectedValue(new Error('RTT measurement blocked: target resolves to a private or reserved address.'));
await expect(handler.handleNetworkRttMeasure({ url: 'https://10.0.0.1/', probeType: 'tcp' })).rejects.toThrow(/blocked/);
expect(state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(state.icmpProbe).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it('bypass proof: call_tool can drive network_icmp_probe to a private IP without the SSRF authorization guard', async () => {
const raw = new RawHandlers();
const ctx = {
router: { has: vi.fn((name: string) => name === 'network_icmp_probe') },
executeToolWithTracking: vi.fn((name: string, args: Record<string, unknown>) => raw.handleNetworkIcmpProbe(args)),
} as any;
const response = await handleCallTool(ctx, { name: 'network_icmp_probe', args: { target: '10.0.0.1', ttl: 64 } });
const body = JSON.parse(response.content[0].text);
expect(body.success).toBe(true);
expect(ctx.router.has).toHaveBeenCalledWith('network_icmp_probe');
expect(ctx.executeToolWithTracking).toHaveBeenCalledWith('network_icmp_probe', { target: '10.0.0.1', ttl: 64 });
expect(state.resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(state.icmpProbe).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({ target: '10.0.0.1', ttl: 64 }));
});
Command run:
corepack pnpm exec vitest run --config vitest.config.ts tests/server/security/jshookmcp-network-meta-boundary.test.ts --reporter=verbose
Result:
Test Files 1 passed (1)
Tests 4 passed (4)
The observed vulnerable call sequence is:
call_tool(name=network_icmp_probe, args={target: 10.0.0.1, ttl: 64})
-> ctx.router.has(network_icmp_probe) == true
-> ctx.executeToolWithTracking(network_icmp_probe, validatedArgs)
-> RawHandlers.handleNetworkIcmpProbe(validatedArgs)
-> resolveHostname(10.0.0.1) returns 10.0.0.1
-> icmpProbe({ target: 10.0.0.1, ttl: 64, ... })
resolveAuthorizedTransportTarget is not called on this path. The same missing policy pattern exists for network_traceroute.
Impact
An MCP client with access to the active network domain can use the server as a backend-origin internal network probing oracle. The result can reveal whether internal hosts respond, approximate latency, traceroute hops, and ICMP error classes from the server network position.
The practical impact is strongest when jshookmcp is exposed over Streamable HTTP or another remote transport, multiple clients share one server, or the server runs on Windows or with raw socket capability. This is not code execution and does not by itself exfiltrate response bodies.
Remediation
Apply the same authorization model used by network_rtt_measure and network_latency_stats to network_icmp_probe and network_traceroute. In particular, accept an optional authorization object, resolve the target through the central policy helper or an equivalent host-only policy helper, block private and reserved ranges by default, and pass only the policy-approved resolved address to the native probe. Add regression tests for default-denied private targets, authorized private CIDR access, private hostnames, and call_tool dispatch.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @jshookmcp/jshook | ≥ 0.3.1&&< 0.3.2 | 0.3.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @jshookmcp/jshook. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update @jshookmcp/jshook to 0.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-49856 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-49856 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to CVE-2026-49856. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-49856 in your dependencies?
O3 detects CVE-2026-49856 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.