CVE-2026-49343 — klever-go
MEDIUMCVE-2026-49343 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/klever-io/klever-go. A fix is available for github.com/klever-io/klever-go — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Klever-Go KVM: Throttler slot leak in trie account-data sync causes epoch bootstrap / state sync DoS
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-49343.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-49343 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 390,807 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/klever-io/klever-goReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The account-data trie syncers leak bounded throttler slots on error paths in syncDataTrie(). Each failed trie sync permanently consumes one slot from
the NumGoRoutinesThrottler, and the slot is never returned unless the sync succeeds or the root hash was already present.
I confirmed this on the current default branch develop at commit 9640d63 (observed on May 20, 2026). I also confirmed the bug with a runtime PoC
using the real timeout path in trieSyncer.StartSyncing(): two timed-out sync attempts are enough to exhaust a throttler with capacity 2.
This affects the epoch bootstrap path because syncUserAccountsState() and syncKappAccountsState() create bounded throttlers and abort bootstrap
immediately if the syncer returns an error. Once enough trie-root sync attempts fail, the syncer cannot make forward progress and bootstrap fails.
Affected Components
data/syncer/userAccountsSyncer.godata/syncer/kappAccountsSyncer.godata/trie/sync.gocore/throttler/numGoRoutinesThrottler.gocore/bootstrap/process.go
Affected Version
Verified on:
developHEAD9640d63
Please check whether the same code is present in supported 1.7.x releases.
Suggested Severity
High
Vulnerability Details
Root Cause
Both account-data syncers call StartProcessing() before creating / starting the trie syncer, but they only call EndProcessing() on the success path
and on the duplicate-root early return.
userAccountsSyncer.syncDataTrie():
func (u *userAccountsSyncer) syncDataTrie(rootHash []byte, ssh data.SyncStatisticsHandler, ctx context.Context) error {
u.throttler.StartProcessing()
u.syncerMutex.Lock()
if _, ok := u.dataTries[string(rootHash)]; ok {
u.syncerMutex.Unlock()
u.throttler.EndProcessing()
return nil
}
dataTrie, err := trie.NewTrie(...)
if err != nil {
u.syncerMutex.Unlock()
return err
}
trieSyncer, err := trie.NewTrieSyncer(arg)
if err != nil {
u.syncerMutex.Unlock()
return err
}
u.syncerMutex.Unlock()
err = trieSyncer.StartSyncing(rootHash, ctx)
if err != nil {
return err
}
u.throttler.EndProcessing()
return nil
}
The same bug exists in kappAccountsSyncer.syncDataTrie().
Missing slot release paths
After StartProcessing(), the following error paths return without EndProcessing():
- trie.NewTrie(...) returns an error
- trie.NewTrieSyncer(...) returns an error
- trieSyncer.StartSyncing(...) returns an error
Why this matters
NumGoRoutinesThrottler is a strict bounded counter:
func (ngrt *NumGoRoutinesThrottler) CanProcess() bool {
valCounter := atomic.LoadInt32(&ngrt.counter)
return valCounter < ngrt.max
}
func (ngrt *NumGoRoutinesThrottler) StartProcessing() {
atomic.AddInt32(&ngrt.counter, 1)
}
func (ngrt *NumGoRoutinesThrottler) EndProcessing() {
atomic.AddInt32(&ngrt.counter, -1)
}
Once leaked, a slot remains consumed for the lifetime of that throttler instance.
The parent loops in both syncers wait for capacity before starting the next account-data trie sync:
for !u.throttler.CanProcess() {
select {
case <-time.After(timeBetweenRetries):
continue
case <-ctx.Done():
return common.ErrTimeIsOut
}
}
So after enough failures, further roots stop progressing and the sync operation eventually returns time is out.
Bootstrap impact
Epoch bootstrap uses these syncers directly and aborts on any error:
err = e.syncUserAccountsState(e.epochStartMeta.Header.TrieRoot)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
err = e.syncKappAccountsState(e.epochStartMeta.Header.KAppsTrieRoot)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
The throttlers for these paths are real bounded throttlers created from numConcurrentTrieSyncers.
Proof of Concept
I verified the bug with the real timeout path, not only with a canceled context.
The PoC below uses:
- a real NumGoRoutinesThrottler with capacity 2
- a real trieSyncer.StartSyncing()
- an empty trie-node cache and a request handler that never supplies nodes
- a short sync timeout (1s) so StartSyncing() returns trie.ErrTimeIsOut
After the first failed sync, one slot remains leaked. After the second failed sync, the throttler is exhausted.
PoC test
package syncer
import (
"context"
"testing"
"time"
commonmock "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/common/mock"
corethrottler "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/core/throttler"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/trie"
triestats "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/trie/statistics"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
func newBaseSyncerForTimeoutPOC(t *testing.T) *baseAccountsSyncer {
t.Helper()
storageManager, err := trie.NewTrieStorageManagerWithoutPruning(commonmock.NewMemDbMock())
require.NoError(t, err)
return &baseAccountsSyncer{
hasher: commonmock.HasherMock{},
marshalizer: &commonmock.MarshalizerMock{},
trieSyncers: make(map[string]data.TrieSyncer),
dataTries: make(map[string]data.Trie),
trieStorageManager: storageManager,
requestHandler: &commonmock.RequestHandlerStub{},
timeout: time.Second,
cacher: commonmock.NewCacherStub(),
maxTrieLevelInMemory: 5,
name: "timeout-poc",
maxHardCapForMissingNodes: 1,
}
}
func TestPOC_UserAccountsSyncer_LeaksThrottlerSlotOnTrieTimeout(t *testing.T) {
thr, err := corethrottler.NewNumGoRoutinesThrottler(2)
require.NoError(t, err)
s := &userAccountsSyncer{
baseAccountsSyncer: newBaseSyncerForTimeoutPOC(t),
throttler: thr,
}
err = s.syncDataTrie([]byte("missing-root-1"), triestats.NewTrieSyncStatistics(), context.Background())
require.ErrorIs(t, err, trie.ErrTimeIsOut)
require.True(t, thr.CanProcess())
err = s.syncDataTrie([]byte("missing-root-2"), triestats.NewTrieSyncStatistics(), context.Background())
require.ErrorIs(t, err, trie.ErrTimeIsOut)
require.False(t, thr.CanProcess())
}
func TestPOC_KappAccountsSyncer_LeaksThrottlerSlotOnTrieTimeout(t *testing.T) {
thr, err := corethrottler.NewNumGoRoutinesThrottler(2)
require.NoError(t, err)
s := &kappAccountsSyncer{
baseAccountsSyncer: newBaseSyncerForTimeoutPOC(t),
throttler: thr,
}
err = s.syncDataTrie([]byte("missing-root-1"), triestats.NewTrieSyncStatistics(), context.Background())
require.ErrorIs(t, err, trie.ErrTimeIsOut)
require.True(t, thr.CanProcess())
err = s.syncDataTrie([]byte("missing-root-2"), triestats.NewTrieSyncStatistics(), context.Background())
require.ErrorIs(t, err, trie.ErrTimeIsOut)
require.False(t, thr.CanProcess())
}
Command used
go test ./data/syncer -run 'TestPOC_(User|Kapp)AccountsSyncer_LeaksThrottlerSlotOnTrieTimeout' -count=1
Result
ok github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/syncer 4.005s
This confirms the leak with the real timeout path from trieSyncer.StartSyncing().
Impact
An attacker who can repeatedly cause trie-node sync failures or timeouts during bootstrap can consume the bounded sync throttler until no capacity remains.
Once enough slots are leaked:
- additional account-data trie sync attempts stop making progress
- the parent loop waits until context timeout
- SyncAccounts() fails
- epoch bootstrap fails
This is a core node availability issue. It affects fresh/restarting nodes and validators that need to bootstrap or resync state.
This is not a theoretical issue:
- StartSyncing() performs network-dependent trie-node retrieval
- it already has explicit timeout / failure paths
- the leaked throttler slots are confirmed by runtime PoC
Recommended Fix
Release the slot with defer immediately after StartProcessing() and cancel the defer only if ownership is intentionally transferred, which is not the case here.
Example fix pattern:
func (u *userAccountsSyncer) syncDataTrie(rootHash []byte, ssh data.SyncStatisticsHandler, ctx context.Context) error {
u.throttler.StartProcessing()
defer u.throttler.EndProcessing()
u.syncerMutex.Lock()
defer u.syncerMutex.Unlock()
if _, ok := u.dataTries[string(rootHash)]; ok {
return nil
}
dataTrie, err := trie.NewTrie(...)
if err != nil {
return err
}
trieSyncer, err := trie.NewTrieSyncer(arg)
if err != nil {
return err
}
u.trieSyncers[string(rootHash)] = trieSyncer
return trieSyncer.StartSyncing(rootHash, ctx)
}
The same pattern should be applied to:
- data/syncer/userAccountsSyncer.go
- data/syncer/kappAccountsSyncer.go
References
- data/syncer/userAccountsSyncer.go
- data/syncer/kappAccountsSyncer.go
- data/trie/sync.go
- core/throttler/numGoRoutinesThrottler.go
- core/bootstrap/process.go
- SECURITY.md
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/klever-io/klever-go | all versions | 1.7.18go get github.com/klever-io/klever-go@v1.7.18 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/klever-io/klever-go, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/klever-io/klever-go to 1.7.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-49343 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-49343 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.