NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-46362 — phpmyfaq

CVE-2026-46362 is a CWE-863 vulnerability in phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. A fix is available for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq — see the affected versions and patch details below.

phpMyFAQ - Authorization Bypass in Admin Pages via Non-Terminating Permission Check

Also known asGHSA-hpgw-ww76-c68r
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-46362.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs23th percentile — riskier than 23% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.34%0.68%1.01%0.0%0.3%Jun 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐘phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq🐘thorsten/phpmyfaq

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

AbstractAdministrationController::userHasPermission() catches the ForbiddenException thrown when a user lacks a specific permission, sends a "forbidden" HTML page via $response->send(), but does not terminate execution. The calling controller method continues to execute, fetches protected data, renders the full template, and returns it as a Response. The final $response->send() in admin/index.php outputs the protected page content after the forbidden page, leaking all permission-protected admin data to any authenticated admin user regardless of their actual permissions.

Details

The parent class AbstractController::userHasPermission() (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/AbstractController.php:317-327) correctly enforces authorization by throwing a ForbiddenException when the user lacks the required permission. This exception would normally propagate to Symfony's HttpKernel exception handler, which would return an error response and prevent the controller from continuing.

However, AbstractAdministrationController overrides this method at line 390-399:

#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    try {
        parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
    } catch (ForbiddenException $exception) {
        $response = $this->getForbiddenPage($exception->getMessage());
        $response->send();  // Outputs HTML but does NOT terminate execution
    } catch (Exception $exception) {
        $this->configuration->getLogger()->error($exception->getMessage());
        // Only logs, no response, no termination
    }
}

The critical flaw: after $response->send() at line 396, there is no exit(), die(), return, or re-throw. PHP execution continues normally into the calling controller method.

For example, in AdminLogController::index() (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AdminLogController.php:45-83):

public function index(Request $request): Response
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::STATISTICS_ADMINLOG);
    // ^^^ If user lacks permission: forbidden page is echoed, but execution continues

    // ... all of this still executes:
    $loggingData = $this->adminLog->getAll();  // Fetches ALL admin log entries
    // ...
    return $this->render('@admin/statistics/admin-log.twig', [
        // ... full admin log data including IPs, usernames, actions
        'loggingData' => $currentItems,
    ]);
}

The entry point admin/index.php then calls $response->send() on the returned Response, appending the full protected page to the already-sent forbidden page in the HTTP response body.

The second catch block (line 397-398) for generic Exception is even worse — it only logs the error without sending any response or terminating, so the protected page renders with no forbidden notice at all.

58 admin controllers extend AbstractAdministrationController and call userHasPermission(), meaning every permission-protected admin page is affected. This includes:

  • Admin logs (user IPs, actions, usernames)
  • User management (user data, permissions)
  • System information (server configuration, PHP info)
  • Configuration pages (all application settings)
  • Backup pages
  • All other admin functionality

PoC

  1. Create a test admin user with minimal permissions (e.g., only FAQ editing, no statistics access):

  2. Authenticate as the limited admin user and request a permission-protected page:

# Get admin session cookies by logging in
curl -c cookies.txt -d 'faqusername=limited_admin&faqpassword=password&pmf-csrf-token=TOKEN' \
  'https://TARGET/admin/?action=login'

# Access admin log page (requires STATISTICS_ADMINLOG permission)
curl -b cookies.txt -s 'https://TARGET/admin/statistics/admin-log' | tee response.html

# The response contains BOTH the forbidden page HTML AND the full admin log:
grep -c 'You are not allowed' response.html    # 1 — forbidden page was sent
grep -c 'loggingData\|ad_adminlog_ip' response.html  # matches — admin log data also present

# Access system information (requires CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission)  
curl -b cookies.txt -s 'https://TARGET/admin/system-information' | tee sysinfo.html
# Contains PHP version, extensions, database info, server configuration
  1. The HTTP response body contains the forbidden page HTML followed by the full protected page HTML, including all sensitive data.

Impact

Any authenticated admin user — even one with zero administrative permissions beyond basic login — can access every permission-protected admin page by simply requesting its URL. The permission check sends a forbidden page but does not stop execution, so the protected content is always appended to the response.

Exposed data includes:

  • Admin logs: All admin users' IP addresses, actions, and timestamps
  • User management: User accounts, email addresses, permissions
  • System information: PHP configuration, database details, server paths
  • Configuration: All application settings including security-sensitive values
  • Backups: Database export functionality

This effectively renders the entire admin permission system non-functional for the 58 page controllers using AbstractAdministrationController.

Recommended Fix

Add return after sending the forbidden response, and re-throw for the generic Exception case:

#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    try {
        parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
    } catch (ForbiddenException $exception) {
        $response = $this->getForbiddenPage($exception->getMessage());
        $response->send();
        exit;  // Terminate execution to prevent controller from continuing
    } catch (Exception $exception) {
        $this->configuration->getLogger()->error($exception->getMessage());
        throw $exception;  // Re-throw to prevent controller from continuing
    }
}

A cleaner architectural fix would be to not swallow the exception at all, and instead let it propagate to the Symfony HttpKernel exception handler (which already handles ForbiddenException via WebExceptionListener):

#[\Override]
protected function userHasPermission(PermissionType $permissionType): void
{
    // Simply delegate to parent — let ForbiddenException propagate
    // to the WebExceptionListener which renders the appropriate error page
    parent::userHasPermission($permissionType);
}

Or remove the override entirely, since the WebExceptionListener registered in the Kernel already handles exception-to-response conversion.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistphpmyfaq/phpmyfaqall versions4.1.2composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2
🐘Packagistthorsten/phpmyfaqall versions4.1.2composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq to 4.1.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-46362 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `AbstractAdministrationController::userHasPermission()` catches the `ForbiddenException` thrown when a user lacks a specific permission, sends a "forbidden" HTML page via `$response->send()`, but does not terminate execution. The calling controller method continues to execute, fetches protected data, renders the full template, and returns it as a Response. The final `$response->send()` in `admin/index.php` outputs the protected page content after the forbidden page, leaking all permission-protected admin data to any authenticated admin user regardless of their actual permissions.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-46362 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-46362: phpmyfaq CSRF — Fixed in 4.1.2