Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-44317 pcf

MEDIUMFix: free5gc/pcf@508d70b

CVE-2026-44317 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/pcf. A fix is available for github.com/free5gc/pcf — see the affected versions and patch details below.

free5GC: PCF npcf-policyauthorization POST /app-sessions panics on suppFeat=1 with missing AfRoutReq via nil pointer dereference

Also known asGHSA-wwqh-7jm5-gj7wGO-2026-5731
Published
May 27, 2026
Updated
Sep 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44317.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs29th percentile — riskier than 29% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-44317 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/free5gc/pcf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

free5GC's PCF POST /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions handler panics on a single authenticated request whose ascReqData.suppFeat == "1" (enabling traffic-routing feature negotiation) and whose medComponents entries supply an afAppId but NO AfRoutReq. The create path then calls provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, ...) with routeReq == nil and dereferences routeReq.RouteToLocs (and other fields) without a nil check, causing runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference. Gin recovery converts the panic into HTTP 500.

The trigger is a single valid authenticated request -- changing only suppFeat from "0" to "1" flips the same shape of POST from a normal 201 Created into a panic-driven 500.

This endpoint requires a valid npcf-policyauthorization OAuth2 access token (PR:L). The PCF process is not killed (Gin recovers); the realized impact is per-request panic-DoS on the app-session create path.

Details

Validated against the PCF container in the official Docker compose lab.

  • Source repo tag: v4.2.1
  • PCF endpoint: http://10.100.200.9:8000
  • Validation date: 2026-03-12

Vulnerable handler path:

postAppSessCtxProcedure
 -> medComponents loop
   -> appID := medComp.AfAppId
      routeReq := medComp.AfRoutReq   // nil when AfRoutReq absent
      provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, medComp.FStatus)

In provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo, routeReq.RouteToLocs, routeReq.UpPathChgSub, and routeReq.AppReloc are dereferenced directly without a nil check. When suppFeat is "0" the traffic-routing branch is not entered and the same input shape returns 201 Created; when suppFeat is "1" the branch is entered and the nil-deref fires.

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/pcf):

  • Affected route + dispatch: NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/api_policyauthorization.go
  • Create handler path: NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go
  • Call site that passes nil routeReq into the traffic-routing helper: NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go
  • Panic site (nil deref of routeReq.* fields): NFs/pcf/internal/sbi/processor/policyauthorization.go:1740

PoC

Reproduced end-to-end against the running PCF at http://10.100.200.9:8000.

  1. Obtain a valid npcf-policyauthorization token from NRF:
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
  --data 'grant_type=client_credentials&nfType=NEF&nfInstanceId=b84c4f0a-6010-4972-8480-e44e625b9ee4&targetNfType=PCF&scope=npcf-policyauthorization'
  1. Trigger the panic with a single valid authenticated POST whose ascReqData.suppFeat == "1", medComponents supplies afAppId, and AfRoutReq is absent:
curl -i -X POST 'http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer <valid_npcf_policyauthorization_jwt>' \
  --data '{"ascReqData":{"suppFeat":"1","notifUri":"http://127.0.0.1:9999/appsess","ueIpv4":"10.60.0.3","dnn":"internet","medComponents":{"1":{"medCompN":1,"afAppId":"app1"}}}}'
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
  1. Control comparison -- same request shape but suppFeat="0" -> normal 201 Created:
curl -i -X POST 'http://10.100.200.9:8000/npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer <valid_npcf_policyauthorization_jwt>' \
  --data '{"ascReqData":{"suppFeat":"0","notifUri":"http://127.0.0.1:9999/appsess","ueIpv4":"10.60.0.3","dnn":"internet","medComponents":{"1":{"medCompN":1,"afAppId":"app1"}}}}'
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
  1. PCF container logs show the panic stack landing in provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo with routeReq = 0x0:
[ERRO][PCF][GIN] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
  github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(..., 0x0, ...)
      .../policyauthorization.go:1740
  github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).postAppSessCtxProcedure
      .../policyauthorization.go:288
  github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi/processor.(*Processor).HandlePostAppSessionsContext
      .../policyauthorization.go:139
  github.com/free5gc/pcf/internal/sbi.(*Server).HTTPPostAppSessions
      .../api_policyauthorization.go:119
[INFO][PCF][GIN] | 500 | POST | /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions |

Impact

NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) caused by improper handling of an exceptional branch (CWE-754): the create path passes routeReq straight into provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo without a nil check, even though medComp.AfRoutReq is optional and is nil for the demonstrated valid input shape. The control experiment with suppFeat="0" proves the request shape itself is otherwise valid.

Gin recovery catches the panic, so the PCF process is NOT killed and other endpoints continue serving. The realized impact is per-request: any authenticated POST against this endpoint with suppFeat="1" and medComponents.*.AfAppId set but AfRoutReq absent returns HTTP 500 with empty body and a stack trace in PCF logs.

Any party that holds (or can obtain) a valid npcf-policyauthorization token can repeatedly drive this code path to sustain a per-request panic-DoS on the app-session create endpoint, with each panic costing more CPU + log writes than the intended controlled response would have.

No Confidentiality impact (the response is 500 with empty body). No persistent Integrity impact (the panic happens before any state mutation). Availability impact is limited to per-request degradation.

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/879 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/pcf/pull/65

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/free5gc/pcfall versions1.4.3go get github.com/free5gc/pcf@v1.4.3

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/free5gc/pcf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/free5gc/pcf to 1.4.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44317 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44317 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-44317. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary free5GC's PCF `POST /npcf-policyauthorization/v1/app-sessions` handler panics on a single authenticated request whose `ascReqData.suppFeat == "1"` (enabling traffic-routing feature negotiation) and whose `medComponents` entries supply an `afAppId` but NO `AfRoutReq`. The create path then calls `provisioningOfTrafficRoutingInfo(smPolicy, appID, routeReq, ...)` with `routeReq == nil` and dereferences `routeReq.RouteToLocs` (and other fields) without a nil check, causing `runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference`. Gin recovery converts the panic into `HTTP 500`
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-44317 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44317 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-44317: pcf DoS (Medium 6.5) | O3 Security