CVE-2026-42035 — axios
HIGHCVE-2026-42035 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-113 vulnerability in axios. A fix is available for axios — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Axios: Header Injection via Prototype Pollution
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-42035.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-42035 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
axiosnpmDescription
Summary
A prototype pollution gadget exists in the Axios HTTP adapter (lib/adapters/http.js) that allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into outgoing requests. The vulnerability exploits duck-type checking of the data payload, where if Object.prototype is polluted with getHeaders, append, pipe, on, once, and Symbol.toStringTag, Axios misidentifies any plain object payload as a FormData instance and calls the attacker-controlled getHeaders() function, merging the returned headers into the outgoing request.
The vulnerable code resides exclusively in lib/adapters/http.js. The prototype pollution source does not need to originate from Axios itself — any prototype pollution primitive in any dependency in the application's dependency tree is sufficient to trigger this gadget.
Prerequisites:
A prototype pollution primitive must exist somewhere in the application's dependency chain (e.g., via lodash.merge, qs, JSON5, or any deep-merge utility processing attacker-controlled input). The pollution source is not required to be in Axios. The application must use Axios to make HTTP requests with a data payload (POST, PUT, PATCH).
Details
The vulnerability is in lib/adapters/http.js, in the data serialization pipeline:
// lib/adapters/http.js
} else if (utils.isFormData(data) && utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)) {
headers.set(data.getHeaders());
// ...
}
Axios uses two sequential duck-type checks, both of which can be satisfied via prototype pollution:
1. utils.isFormData(data) — lib/utils.js
const isFormData = (thing) => {
let kind;
return thing && (
(typeof FormData === 'function' && thing instanceof FormData) || (
isFunction(thing.append) && (
(kind = kindOf(thing)) === 'formdata' ||
(kind === 'object' && isFunction(thing.toString) && thing.toString() === '[object FormData]')
)
)
)
}
2. utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders) — Duck-type for form-data npm package
// Returns true if Object.prototype.getHeaders is a function
utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)
PoC
// Simulate Prototype Pollution
Object.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'FormData';
Object.prototype.append = () => {};
Object.prototype.getHeaders = () => {
const headers = Object.create(null);
(.... Introduce here all the headers you want ....)
return headers;
};
Object.prototype.pipe = function(d) { if(d&&d.end)d.end(); return d; };
Object.prototype.on = function() { return this; };
Object.prototype.once = function() { return this; };
// Legitimate application code
const response = await axios.post('https://internal-api.company.com/admin/delete',
{ userId: 42 },
{ headers: { 'Authorization': 'Bearer VALID_USER_TOKEN' } }
);
Impact
- Authentication Bypass (CVSS: C:H)
- Session Fixation (CVSS: I:H)
- Privilege Escalation (CVSS: C:H, I:H)
- IP Spoofing / WAF Bypass (CVSS: I:H)
Note on Scope: There is an argument to promote this from S:U to S:C (Scope: Changed), which would raise the score to 10.0. In some architectures, Axios is commonly used for service to service communication where downstream services trust identity headers (Authorization, X-Role, X-User-ID, X-Tenant-ID) forwarded from upstream API gateways. In this scenario, the vulnerable component (Axios in Service A) and the impacted component (Service B, which acts on the injected identity) are under different security authorities. The injected headers cross a trust boundary, meaning the impact extends beyond the security scope of the vulnerable component, the CVSS v3.1 definition of a Scope Change. We conservatively score S:U here, but maintainers should evaluate which one applies better here.
Recommended Fix
Add an explicit own-property check in lib/adapters/http.js:
- } else if (utils.isFormData(data) && utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)) {
- headers.set(data.getHeaders());
+ } else if (utils.isFormData(data) && utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders) &&
+ Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, 'getHeaders')) {
+ headers.set(data.getHeaders());
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | axios | ≥ 1.0.0&&< 1.15.1 | 1.15.1npm install axios@1.15.1 |
| 📦npm | axios | all versions | 0.31.1npm install axios@0.31.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for axios, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update axios to 1.15.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-42035 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-42035 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-42035. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0 | axios | RHSA-2026:25089 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | automation-platform-ui-0:2.6.10-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:34160 |
| Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0 | cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-pf4-rhel9:1781116645 | RHSA-2026:26010 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1780917531 | RHSA-2026:24536 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1780910888 | RHSA-2026:25271 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778511348 | RHSA-2026:17657 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778383863 | RHSA-2026:17699 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778532610 | RHSA-2026:19109 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-42035 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-42035 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.