CVE-2026-41523 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Code Injection vulnerability in vllm. A fix is available for vllm — see the affected versions and patch details below.
vLLM: Security Check Bypass via assert Statement in Activation Function Loading Allows Arbitrary Code Execution
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41523.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-41523 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
vllmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An assert-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1).
Details
vLLM uses an assert statement at vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:48 as its sole security control to restrict which activation functions can be loaded from a HuggingFace model's config.json:
# vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:35-53
function_name: str | None = None
if (
hasattr(config, "sentence_transformers")
and "activation_fn" in config.sentence_transformers
):
function_name = config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"]
elif (
hasattr(config, "sbert_ce_default_activation_function")
and config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function is not None
):
function_name = config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function
if function_name is not None:
assert function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."), (
"Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
"torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
)
fn = resolve_obj_by_qualname(function_name)()
Python's assert statements are stripped at compile time when running in optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). When the assert is absent, the attacker-controlled function_name from the model's config.json is passed directly to resolve_obj_by_qualname() — an unrestricted import gadget:
def resolve_obj_by_qualname(qualname: str) -> Any:
module_name, obj_name = qualname.rsplit(".", 1)
module = importlib.import_module(module_name)
return getattr(module, obj_name)
This is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2017-1000433 (pysaml2 assert-based auth bypass), flagged by Bandit B101 and Ruff S101, and the reason Django proactively replaced all assert-based security checks (ticket #32508).
Attacker-controlled input sources:
config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"](line 40)config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function(line 45)
Affected call sites — get_act_fn() is called via resolve_classifier_act_fn() from:
vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/seqwise/poolers.py:122— SequencePoolervllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/tokwise/poolers.py:130— TokenPooler
Broader systemic risk: resolve_obj_by_qualname is called from ~20 locations across the codebase with no validation of its own. Any future caller feeding user-controlled input to it without validation creates the same vulnerability class.
Suggested fix: Replace the assert with an explicit conditional raise:
if not function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."):
raise ValueError(
"Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
"torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
)
Impact
Arbitrary code execution. A malicious model author publishes a HuggingFace model with a crafted config.json. When a victim loads this model with vLLM running under python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1, arbitrary code executes during model initialization with the privileges of the vLLM process.
The attack requires:
- Victim loads a malicious model from HuggingFace (user interaction)
- vLLM runs under
python -OorPYTHONOPTIMIZE=1(documented in production use) - Model uses a cross-encoder architecture (e.g. BERT or RoBERTa with sequence classification)
Coordinated disclosure note: This vulnerability was also reported via huntr.com on April 2, 2026 (https://huntr.com/bounties/dcb05b04-e625-41e7-adbc-bbae0cc2d64c). A GitHub Security Advisory was also filed because it is vLLM's stated preferred disclosure channel per SECURITY.md.
Fix
A fix for this was introduced in this commit: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/b3c7ffcab82c2439726f8cb213800f6f38c023d3
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vllm | all versions | 0.22.0pip install --upgrade 'vllm==0.22.0' |
Affected Products
vllmvllmDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vllm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vllm to 0.22.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41523 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat rates this issue as having Important impact for Red Hat AI Inference Server and Red Hat OpenShift AI vLLM serving images, and Moderate impact for Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI bootc images that bundle vLLM. Exploitation requires loading an untrusted HuggingFace cross-encoder model while the vLLM process runs…
Avoid running vLLM with python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 until updated packages are available. Only load models from trusted sources. Restrict who can deploy or update models on inference endpoints. Apply network access controls and authentication in front of vLLM APIs.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-41523 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1782951012 | RHSA-2026:36005 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1782951244 | RHSA-2026:36006 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1787860580 | RHSA-2026:61627 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1787884873 | RHSA-2026:61629 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1787161382 | RHSA-2026:59138 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1787161803 | RHSA-2026:59139 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4 | rhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:1787151769 | RHSA-2026:57380 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4 | rhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:1787151840 | RHSA-2026:57387 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-41523 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.