Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-41523 — vllm

HIGHFix: vllm-project/vllm@b3c7ffc

CVE-2026-41523 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Code Injection vulnerability in vllm. A fix is available for vllm — see the affected versions and patch details below.

vLLM: Security Check Bypass via assert Statement in Activation Function Loading Allows Arbitrary Code Execution

Also known asGHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3rPYSEC-2026-2300
Published
Jun 22, 2026
Updated
Sep 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 27, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41523.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.9%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs58th percentile — riskier than 58% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-41523 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vllm

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

An assert-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1).

Details

vLLM uses an assert statement at vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:48 as its sole security control to restrict which activation functions can be loaded from a HuggingFace model's config.json:

# vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:35-53
function_name: str | None = None
if (
    hasattr(config, "sentence_transformers")
    and "activation_fn" in config.sentence_transformers
):
    function_name = config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"]
elif (
    hasattr(config, "sbert_ce_default_activation_function")
    and config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function is not None
):
    function_name = config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function

if function_name is not None:
    assert function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."), (
        "Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
        "torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
    )
    fn = resolve_obj_by_qualname(function_name)()

Python's assert statements are stripped at compile time when running in optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). When the assert is absent, the attacker-controlled function_name from the model's config.json is passed directly to resolve_obj_by_qualname() — an unrestricted import gadget:

def resolve_obj_by_qualname(qualname: str) -> Any:
    module_name, obj_name = qualname.rsplit(".", 1)
    module = importlib.import_module(module_name)
    return getattr(module, obj_name)

This is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2017-1000433 (pysaml2 assert-based auth bypass), flagged by Bandit B101 and Ruff S101, and the reason Django proactively replaced all assert-based security checks (ticket #32508).

Attacker-controlled input sources:

  • config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"] (line 40)
  • config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function (line 45)

Affected call sites — get_act_fn() is called via resolve_classifier_act_fn() from:

  • vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/seqwise/poolers.py:122 — SequencePooler
  • vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/tokwise/poolers.py:130 — TokenPooler

Broader systemic risk: resolve_obj_by_qualname is called from ~20 locations across the codebase with no validation of its own. Any future caller feeding user-controlled input to it without validation creates the same vulnerability class.

Suggested fix: Replace the assert with an explicit conditional raise:

if not function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."):
    raise ValueError(
        "Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
        "torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
    )

Impact

Arbitrary code execution. A malicious model author publishes a HuggingFace model with a crafted config.json. When a victim loads this model with vLLM running under python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1, arbitrary code executes during model initialization with the privileges of the vLLM process.

The attack requires:

  1. Victim loads a malicious model from HuggingFace (user interaction)
  2. vLLM runs under python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 (documented in production use)
  3. Model uses a cross-encoder architecture (e.g. BERT or RoBERTa with sequence classification)

Coordinated disclosure note: This vulnerability was also reported via huntr.com on April 2, 2026 (https://huntr.com/bounties/dcb05b04-e625-41e7-adbc-bbae0cc2d64c). A GitHub Security Advisory was also filed because it is vLLM's stated preferred disclosure channel per SECURITY.md.

Fix

A fix for this was introduced in this commit: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/b3c7ffcab82c2439726f8cb213800f6f38c023d3

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvllmall versions0.22.0pip install --upgrade 'vllm==0.22.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
vllmvllm
< 0.22.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vllm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vllm to 0.22.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41523 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

Red Hat rates this issue as having Important impact for Red Hat AI Inference Server and Red Hat OpenShift AI vLLM serving images, and Moderate impact for Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI bootc images that bundle vLLM. Exploitation requires loading an untrusted HuggingFace cross-encoder model while the vLLM process runs…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Avoid running vLLM with python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 until updated packages are available. Only load models from trusted sources. Restrict who can deploy or update models on inference endpoints. Apply network access controls and authentication in front of vLLM APIs.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-41523 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1782951012RHSA-2026:36005
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1782951244RHSA-2026:36006
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1787860580RHSA-2026:61627
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1787884873RHSA-2026:61629
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1787161382RHSA-2026:59138
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1787161803RHSA-2026:59139
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4rhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:1787151769RHSA-2026:57380
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4rhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:1787151840RHSA-2026:57387

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary An `assert`-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (`python -O` or `PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1`). ### Details vLLM uses an `assert` statement at [`vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:48`](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py#L48) as its sole security control to restrict which activation functions can be loaded from a HuggingFace m
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-41523 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-41523: vllm RCE (High 7.5) | O3 Security