NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-35405 — libp2p-rendezvous

HIGH

CVE-2026-35405 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-770 vulnerability in libp2p-rendezvous. A fix is available for libp2p-rendezvous — see the affected versions and patch details below.

libp2p-rendezvous: Unlimited namespace registrations per peer enables OOM DoS on rendezvous servers

Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-35405.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.01%
Lower risk than most CVEs36th percentile — riskier than 36% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.33%0.66%0.99%0.1%0.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀libp2p-rendezvous

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

found that libp2p-rendezvous server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. a malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed.

no auth required. any peer on the network can do this.

Details

the bug is in Registrations::add() inside protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs.

the store uses a BiMap keyed on (PeerId, Namespace) so yes, a peer can't register the same namespace twice. but there's nothing stopping it from registering 10,000 different namespaces. each unique one gets its own entry in:

  • registrations_for_peer (BiMap)
  • registrations (HashMap)
  • next_expiry (FuturesUnordered a new heap-allocated BoxFuture per registration)

namespace strings are only validated for length (MAX_NAMESPACE = 255), not count. there's no max_registrations_per_peer anywhere in Config or the rest of the codebase.

making it worse MAX_TTL = 72 hours. so every registration just sits there for up to 3 days. disconnecting doesn't clean anything up either, entries only go away when the TTL fires.

protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs
  └── Registrations::add()   ← no per-peer count check anywhere

protocols/rendezvous/src/lib.rs
  ├── MAX_NAMESPACE = 255    ← length capped, count is not
  └── MAX_TTL = 72h          ← entries persist a long time

fix would be adding something like max_registrations_per_peer to Config and checking it at the top of add() before inserting anything.

PoC

tested on libp2p v0.56.1, built from source.

step 1 - start the rendezvous server (uses the example from the repo):

cargo run --manifest-path examples/rendezvous/Cargo.toml --bin rendezvous-example

step 2 - run the flood client (attached as rzv-flood.rs):

cargo run --manifest-path examples/rendezvous/Cargo.toml --bin rzv-flood

it connects as a single peer and registers 10,000 unique namespaces (flood-00000000 through flood-00009999), chaining each registration on the confirmed Registered event from the previous one.

server accepted every single one. not one rejection.

memory on the server side (via ps aux RSS column):

baseline:       ~18 MB
mid flood:      ~26 MB  
after 10k regs: ~28 MB

that's from one peer. scale to 100 sybil peers doing the same thing and you're looking at ~1GB. 1000 peers and the server is dead.

<img width="1032" height="124" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f778f179-2aa1-4485-940c-25e218733fa8" />

server RSS climbing during the flood

<img width="553" height="760" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/691b0f52-dda0-443f-a3c2-98c8c6336f2f" />

10,000 registrations confirmed, zero rejected

Impact

any node running libp2p-rendezvous server-side is affected. rendezvous servers are typically well-known, publicly reachable nodes taking one down disrupts peer discovery for all clients depending on it. any rust-libp2p based project that deploys a rendezvous point is at risk.

no special position on the network needed. no crypto work. just open a connection and send REGISTER in a loop.

Researchers

Discovered by:

  • Ramesh Adhikari (CoE-CNDS Lab, VJTI, Mumbai, India)
  • Dr. Faruk Kazi (CoE-CNDS Lab, VJTI, Mumbai, India)

Organization: Centre of Excellence in Complex & Nonlinear Dynamical Systems (CoE-CNDS Lab), Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI), Mumbai, India


We have not disclosed this to any other vendor or made it public. We are reporting directly to the rust-libp2p security team through this advisory.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iolibp2p-rendezvousall versions0.17.1cargo update -p libp2p-rendezvous --precise 0.17.1

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
libp2pprotocol
< 0.17.1
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for libp2p-rendezvous, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update libp2p-rendezvous to 0.17.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-35405 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary found that `libp2p-rendezvous` server has no limit on how many namespaces a single peer can register. a malicious peer can just keep registering unique namespaces in a loop and the server happily accepts every single one allocating memory for each registration with no pushback. keep doing this long enough (or with multiple sybil peers) and the server process gets OOM killed. no auth required. any peer on the network can do this. ### Details the bug is in `Registrations::add()` inside `protocols/rendezvous/src/server.rs`. the store uses a BiMap keyed on `(PeerId, Namespace)`
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-35405 in your dependencies?

Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-35405: libp2p-rendezvous — Fixed in 0.17.1