CVE-2026-34753 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in vllm. A fix is available for vllm — see the affected versions and patch details below.
vLLM affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `download_bytes_from_url `
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34753.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-34753 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
vllmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in download_bytes_from_url allows any actor who can control batch input JSON to make the vLLM batch runner issue arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests from the server, without any URL validation or domain restrictions.
This can be used to target internal services (e.g. cloud metadata endpoints or internal HTTP APIs) reachable from the vLLM host.
Details
Vulnerable component
The vulnerable logic is in the batch runner entrypoint vllm/entrypoints/openai/run_batch.py, function download_bytes_from_url:
# run_batch.py Lines 442-482
async def download_bytes_from_url(url: str) -> bytes:
"""
Download data from a URL or decode from a data URL.
Args:
url: Either an HTTP/HTTPS URL or a data URL (data:...;base64,...)
Returns:
Data as bytes
"""
parsed = urlparse(url)
# Handle data URLs (base64 encoded)
if parsed.scheme == "data":
# Format: data:...;base64,<base64_data>
if "," in url:
header, data = url.split(",", 1)
if "base64" in header:
return base64.b64decode(data)
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unsupported data URL encoding: {header}")
else:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid data URL format: {url}")
# Handle HTTP/HTTPS URLs
elif parsed.scheme in ("http", "https"):
async with (
aiohttp.ClientSession() as session,
session.get(url) as resp,
):
if resp.status != 200:
raise Exception(
f"Failed to download data from URL: {url}. Status: {resp.status}"
)
return await resp.read()
else:
raise ValueError(
f"Unsupported URL scheme: {parsed.scheme}. "
"Supported schemes: http, https, data"
)
Key properties:
- The function only parses the URL to dispatch on the scheme (
data,http,https). - For
http/https, it directly callssession.get(url)on the provided string. - There is no validation of:
- hostname or IP address,
- whether the target is internal or external,
- port number,
- path, query, or redirect target.
- This is in contrast to the multimodal media path (
MediaConnector), which implements an explicit domain allowlist.download_bytes_from_urldoes not reuse that protection.
URL controllability
The url argument is fully controlled by batch input JSON via the file_url field of BatchTranscriptionRequest / BatchTranslationRequest.
- Batch request body type:
# run_batch.py Line 67-80
class BatchTranscriptionRequest(TranscriptionRequest):
"""
Batch transcription request that uses file_url instead of file.
This class extends TranscriptionRequest but replaces the file field
with file_url to support batch processing from audio files written in JSON format.
"""
file_url: str = Field(
...,
description=(
"Either a URL of the audio or a data URL with base64 encoded audio data. "
),
)
# run_batch.py Line 98-111
class BatchTranslationRequest(TranslationRequest):
"""
Batch translation request that uses file_url instead of file.
This class extends TranslationRequest but replaces the file field
with file_url to support batch processing from audio files written in JSON format.
"""
file_url: str = Field(
...,
description=(
"Either a URL of the audio or a data URL with base64 encoded audio data. "
),
)
There is no restriction on the domain, IP, or port of file_url in these models.
- Batch input is parsed directly from the batch file:
# run_batch.py Line 139-179
class BatchRequestInput(OpenAIBaseModel):
...
url: str
body: BatchRequestInputBody
@field_validator("body", mode="plain")
@classmethod
def check_type_for_url(cls, value: Any, info: ValidationInfo):
url: str = info.data["url"]
...
if url == "/v1/audio/transcriptions":
return BatchTranscriptionRequest.model_validate(value)
if url == "/v1/audio/translations":
return BatchTranslationRequest.model_validate(value)
# run_batch.py Line 770-781
logger.info("Reading batch from %s...", args.input_file)
# Submit all requests in the file to the engine "concurrently".
response_futures: list[Awaitable[BatchRequestOutput]] = []
for request_json in (await read_file(args.input_file)).strip().split("\n"):
# Skip empty lines.
request_json = request_json.strip()
if not request_json:
continue
request = BatchRequestInput.model_validate_json(request_json)
The batch runner reads each line of the input file (args.input_file), parses it as JSON, and constructs a BatchTranscriptionRequest / BatchTranslationRequest. Whatever file_url appears in that JSON line becomes batch_request_body.file_url.
file_urlis passed directly intodownload_bytes_from_url:
# run_batch.py Line 610-623
def wrapper(handler_fn: Callable):
async def transcription_wrapper(
batch_request_body: (BatchTranscriptionRequest | BatchTranslationRequest),
) -> (
TranscriptionResponse
| TranscriptionResponseVerbose
| TranslationResponse
| TranslationResponseVerbose
| ErrorResponse
):
try:
# Download data from URL
audio_data = await download_bytes_from_url(batch_request_body.file_url)
So the data flow is:
- Attacker supplies JSON line in the batch input file with arbitrary
body.file_url. BatchRequestInput/BatchTranscriptionRequest/BatchTranslationRequestparse that JSON and storefile_urlverbatim.make_transcription_wrappercallsdownload_bytes_from_url(batch_request_body.file_url).download_bytes_from_url’s HTTP/HTTPS branch issuesaiohttp.ClientSession().get(url)to that attacker-controlled URL with no further validation.
This is a classic SSRF pattern: a server-side component makes arbitrary HTTP requests to a URL string taken from untrusted input.
Comparison with safer code
The project already contains a safer URL-handling path for multimodal media in vllm/multimodal/media/connector.py, which demonstrates the intent to mitigate SSRF via domain allowlists and URL normalization:
# connector.py Lines 169-189
def load_from_url(
self,
url: str,
media_io: MediaIO[_M],
*,
fetch_timeout: int | None = None,
) -> _M: # type: ignore[type-var]
url_spec = parse_url(url)
if url_spec.scheme and url_spec.scheme.startswith("http"):
self._assert_url_in_allowed_media_domains(url_spec)
connection = self.connection
data = connection.get_bytes(
url_spec.url,
timeout=fetch_timeout,
allow_redirects=envs.VLLM_MEDIA_URL_ALLOW_REDIRECTS,
)
return media_io.load_bytes(data)
and:
# connector.py Lines 158-167
def _assert_url_in_allowed_media_domains(self, url_spec: Url) -> None:
if (
self.allowed_media_domains
and url_spec.hostname not in self.allowed_media_domains
):
raise ValueError(
f"The URL must be from one of the allowed domains: "
f"{self.allowed_media_domains}. Input URL domain: "
f"{url_spec.hostname}"
)
download_bytes_from_url does not reuse this allowlist or any equivalent validation, even though it also fetches user-provided URLs.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vllm | ≥ 0.16.0&&< 0.19.0 | 0.19.0pip install --upgrade 'vllm==0.19.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vllm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vllm to 0.19.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34753 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-34753 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-34753. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4 | rhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:1787151769 | RHSA-2026:57380 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4 | rhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:1787151840 | RHSA-2026:57387 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4 | rhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1787151771 | RHSA-2026:57389 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.4 | rhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1787151774 | RHSA-2026:57390 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.4 | rhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9:1787310717 | RHSA-2026:59144 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.4 | rhelai3/bootc-aws-cuda-rhel9:1787253912 | RHSA-2026:59151 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-34753 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-34753 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.