NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-33661 — pay

HIGHFix: yansongda/pay@26987eb

CVE-2026-33661 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) CWE-290 vulnerability in yansongda/pay. A fix is available for yansongda/pay — see the affected versions and patch details below.

WeChat Pay callback signature verification bypassed when Host header is localhost

Also known asGHSA-q938-ghwv-8gvc
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33661.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs45th percentile — riskier than 45% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.39%0.78%1.17%0.0%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘yansongda/pay

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The verify_wechat_sign() function in src/Functions.php unconditionally skips all signature verification when the PSR-7 request reports localhost as the host. An attacker can exploit this by sending a crafted HTTP request to the WeChat Pay callback endpoint with a Host: localhost header, bypassing the RSA signature check entirely.

This allows forging fake WeChat Pay payment success notifications, potentially causing applications to mark orders as paid without actual payment.

Vulnerable Code

src/Functions.php lines 243-246:

function verify_wechat_sign(ResponseInterface|ServerRequestInterface $message, array $params): void
{
    // BYPASS: Returns without any signature check if Host header is localhost
    if ($message instanceof ServerRequestInterface && 'localhost' === $message->getUri()->getHost()) {
        return;  // No signature verified!
    }

    // ... openssl_verify() only reached when Host != localhost
    $wechatSerial = $message->getHeaderLine('Wechatpay-Serial');
    $sign = $message->getHeaderLine('Wechatpay-Signature');
    $result = 1 === openssl_verify($content, base64_decode($sign), $public, 'sha256WithRSAEncryption');
}

In PSR-7 implementations (Nyholm, Guzzle PSR-7, etc.), $request->getUri()->getHost() reads the Host HTTP header, which is fully attacker-controlled.

Proof of Concept

curl -X POST https://merchant.example.com/payment/wechat/callback \
  -H "Host: localhost" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Wechatpay-Serial: any" \
  -H "Wechatpay-Timestamp: 1234567890" \
  -H "Wechatpay-Nonce: abc" \
  -H "Wechatpay-Signature: AAAA" \
  -d '{"id":"fake-order","event_type":"TRANSACTION.SUCCESS"}'

verify_wechat_sign() returns immediately without verifying the signature. The application marks the order as paid.

Impact

  • Payment fraud: Attacker receives goods/services without actual payment by forging WeChat Pay callbacks
  • No authentication required: Pure network attack, zero privileges needed
  • Wide reach: Affects any application using yansongda/pay for WeChat Pay callback validation. However, in most environments, Nginx/Ingress/Cloudflare/WAF will directly reject the forgery of this request header, so there is no need to worry too much.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistyansongda/payall versions3.7.20composer require yansongda/pay:^3.7.20

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
payyansongda
< 3.7.20
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for yansongda/pay, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update yansongda/pay to 3.7.20 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33661 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The `verify_wechat_sign()` function in `src/Functions.php` unconditionally **skips all signature verification** when the PSR-7 request reports `localhost` as the host. An attacker can exploit this by sending a crafted HTTP request to the WeChat Pay callback endpoint with a `Host: localhost` header, bypassing the RSA signature check entirely. This allows forging fake WeChat Pay payment success notifications, potentially causing applications to mark orders as paid without actual payment. ## Vulnerable Code **`src/Functions.php` lines 243-246:** ```php function verify_wechat_sign(R
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-33661 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-33661: pay — Fixed in 3.7.20