CVE-2026-33241 — salvo
CVE-2026-33241 is a CWE-770 vulnerability in salvo. A fix is available for salvo — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Salvo Affected by Denial of Service via Unbounded Memory Allocation in Form Data Parsing
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33241.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
salvoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Salvo's form data parsing implementations (form_data() method and Extractible macro) do not enforce payload size limits before reading request bodies into memory. This allows attackers to cause Out-of-Memory (OOM) conditions by sending extremely large payloads, leading to service crashes and denial of service.
Details
Vulnerability Description
Three attack vectors exist in Salvo's form handling:
-
URL-encoded form data (
application/x-www-form-urlencoded)Request::form_data()callsBodyExt::collect(body)which reads the entire body into memory without size checking- Affects handlers using
req.form_data().awaitdirectly
-
Multipart form data (
multipart/form-data)- Similar unbounded memory allocation during parsing
- Affects handlers processing multipart uploads
-
Extractible macro
#[derive(Extractible)]with#[salvo(extract(default_source(from = "body")))]internally callsform_data()- Vulnerabilities propagate to all extractors using body sources
Root Cause
The FormData::read() implementation prioritizes convenience over safety by reading entire request bodies before validation. Even when Request::payload_with_max_size() is available, it's not automatically applied in the form parsing path.
PoC
- run
Extract data from requestexample in readme.md in docker file with limited memory say 100mb. - Send
application/x-www-form-urlencodedORmultipart/form-datapayload to the endpoint. - The server process OOM-crashes, instead of returning 413 error.
Impact
Immediate Effects
- Service Unavailability: Servers crash under memory pressure
- Resource Exhaustion: Single request can consume all available memory
- Cascading Failures: In containerized environments, OOM can affect other services
Attack Characteristics
- Low Cost: Attacker needs minimal bandwidth (header only, body can be streamed)
- No Authentication: Exploitable on public endpoints
- Difficult to Rate-Limit: Traditional rate limiting may not prevent single large request
- Amplification: Small network cost → large memory consumption
Real-World Scenarios
- Public API endpoints accepting form data
- User registration/profile update handlers
- File upload endpoints using multipart forms
- Any endpoint using
#[derive(Extractible)]with body sources
Suggestion: Make Multipart File Upload Handling Explicit Opt-In
Problem Statement
Currently, Salvo's multipart form data parsing automatically handles file uploads without explicit developer intent. This creates several security and usability concerns:
- Unintended File Storage: Developers may unknowingly accept file uploads when they only intended to handle text fields
- Disk Space Exhaustion: Automatic file buffering to disk can fill storage without proper limits
- Resource Cleanup: Temporary files may not be properly cleaned up if handlers don't expect them
- Attack Surface: Endpoints inadvertently become file upload targets
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | salvo | all versions | 0.89.3cargo update -p salvo --precise 0.89.3 |
Affected Products
salvosalvoDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for salvo, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update salvo to 0.89.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33241 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-33241 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.