CVE-2026-32762 — rack
MEDIUMCVE-2026-32762 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-436 vulnerability in rack. A fix is available for rack — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Rack: Forwarded Header semicolon injection enables Host and Scheme spoofing
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32762.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-32762 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
rack💎rackReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Rack::Utils.forwarded_values parses the RFC 7239 Forwarded header by splitting on semicolons before handling quoted-string values. Because quoted values may legally contain semicolons, a header such as:
Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https"
can be interpreted by Rack as multiple Forwarded directives rather than as a single quoted for value.
In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary validates or preserves quoted Forwarded values differently, this discrepancy can allow an attacker to smuggle host, proto, for, or by parameters through a single header value.
Details
Rack::Utils.forwarded_values processes the header using logic equivalent to:
forwarded_header.split(';').each_with_object({}) do |field, values|
field.split(',').each do |pair|
pair = pair.split('=').map(&:strip).join('=')
return nil unless pair =~ /\A(by|for|host|proto)="?([^"]+)"?\Z/i
(values[$1.downcase.to_sym] ||= []) << $2
end
end
The method splits on ; before it parses individual name=value pairs. This is inconsistent with RFC 7239, which permits quoted-string values, and quoted strings may contain semicolons as literal content.
As a result, a header value such as:
Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https"
is not treated as a single for value. Instead, Rack may interpret it as if the client had supplied separate for, host, and proto directives.
This creates an interpretation conflict when another component in front of Rack treats the quoted value as valid literal content, while Rack reparses it as multiple forwarding parameters.
Impact
Applications that rely on Forwarded to derive request metadata may observe attacker-controlled values for host, proto, for, or related URL components.
In affected deployments, this can lead to host or scheme spoofing in derived values such as req.host, req.scheme, req.base_url, or req.url. Applications that use those values for password reset links, redirects, absolute URL generation, logging, IP-based decisions, or backend requests may be vulnerable to downstream security impact.
The practical security impact depends on deployment architecture. If clients can already supply arbitrary trusted Forwarded parameters directly, this bug may not add meaningful attacker capability. The issue is most relevant where an upstream component and Rack interpret the same Forwarded header differently.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that parses
Forwardedquoted-string values before splitting on parameter delimiters. - Avoid trusting client-supplied
Forwardedheaders unless they are normalized or regenerated by a trusted reverse proxy. - Prefer stripping inbound
Forwardedheaders at the edge and reconstructing them from trusted proxy metadata. - Avoid using
req.host,req.scheme,req.base_url, orreq.urlfor security-sensitive operations unless the forwarding chain is explicitly trusted and validated.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | rack | ≥ 3.0.0.beta1&&< 3.1.21 | 3.1.21bundle update rack --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | rack | ≥ 3.2.0&&< 3.2.6 | 3.2.6bundle update rack --conservative |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rack, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update rack to 3.1.21 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32762 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32762 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-32762. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32762 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32762 across RubyGems dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.