Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-32758 v2

MEDIUMFix: filebrowser/filebrowser@4bd7d69

CVE-2026-32758 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2. A fix is available for github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

File Browser has an Access Rule Bypass via Path Traversal in Copy/Rename Destination Parameter

Also known asGHSA-9f3r-2vgw-m8xpGO-2026-4711
Published
Mar 19, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32758.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-32758 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Description

The resourcePatchHandler in http/resource.go validates the destination path against configured access rules before the path is cleaned/normalized. The rules engine (rules/rules.go) uses literal string prefix matching (strings.HasPrefix) or regex matching against the raw path. The actual file operation (fileutils.Copy, patchAction) subsequently calls path.Clean() which resolves .. sequences, producing a different effective path than the one validated.

This allows an authenticated user with Create or Rename permissions to bypass administrator-configured deny rules by including .. (dot-dot) path traversal sequences in the destination query parameter of a PATCH request.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Verify the rule works normally

# This should return 403 Forbidden
curl -X PATCH \
  -H "X-Auth: <alice_jwt>" \
  "http://host/api/resources/public/test.txt?action=copy&destination=%2Frestricted%2Fcopied.txt"

2. Exploit the bypass

# This should succeed despite the deny rule
curl -X PATCH \
  -H "X-Auth: <alice_jwt>" \
  "http://host/api/resources/public/test.txt?action=copy&destination=%2Fpublic%2F..%2Frestricted%2Fcopied.txt"

3. Result

The file test.txt is copied to /restricted/copied.txt despite the deny rule for /restricted/.

Root Cause Analysis

In http/resource.go:209-257:

dst := r.URL.Query().Get("destination")       // line 212
dst, err := url.QueryUnescape(dst)             // line 214 — dst contains ".."
if !d.Check(src) || !d.Check(dst) {            // line 215 — CHECK ON UNCLEANED PATH
    return http.StatusForbidden, nil
}

In rules/rules.go:29-35:

func (r *Rule) Matches(path string) bool {
    if r.Regex {
        return r.Regexp.MatchString(path)      // regex on literal path
    }
    return strings.HasPrefix(path, r.Path)     // prefix on literal path
}

In fileutils/copy.go:12-17:

func Copy(afs afero.Fs, src, dst string, ...) error {
    if dst = path.Clean("/" + dst); dst == "" { // CLEANING HAPPENS HERE, AFTER CHECK
        return os.ErrNotExist
    }

The rules check sees /public/../restricted/copied.txt (no match for /restricted/ prefix). The file operation resolves it to /restricted/copied.txt (within the restricted path).

Secondary Issue

In the same handler, the error from url.QueryUnescape is checked after d.Check() runs (lines 214-220), meaning the rules check executes on a potentially malformed string if unescaping fails.

Impact

An authenticated user with Copy (Create) or Rename permission can write or move files into any path within their scope that is protected by deny rules. This bypasses both:

  • Prefix-based rules: strings.HasPrefix on uncleaned path misses the match
  • Regex-based rules: Standard patterns like ^/restricted/.* fail on uncleaned path

Cannot be used to:

  • Escape the user's BasePathFs scope (afero prevents this)
  • Read from restricted paths (GET handler uses cleaned r.URL.Path)

Suggested Fix

Clean the destination path before the rules check:

dst, err := url.QueryUnescape(dst)
if err != nil {
    return errToStatus(err), err
}
dst = path.Clean("/" + dst)
src = path.Clean("/" + src)
if !d.Check(src) || !d.Check(dst) {
    return http.StatusForbidden, nil
}
if dst == "/" || src == "/" {
    return http.StatusForbidden, nil
}

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2all versions2.62.0go get github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2@v2.62.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 to 2.62.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32758 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32758 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-32758. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Description The `resourcePatchHandler` in `http/resource.go` validates the destination path against configured access rules before the path is cleaned/normalized. The rules engine (`rules/rules.go`) uses literal string prefix matching (`strings.HasPrefix`) or regex matching against the raw path. The actual file operation (`fileutils.Copy`, `patchAction`) subsequently calls `path.Clean()` which resolves `..` sequences, producing a different effective path than the one validated. This allows an authenticated user with Create or Rename permissions to bypass administrator-configured deny rule
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-32758 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32758 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-32758: v2 (Medium 6.5) | O3 Security