Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

CVE-2026-32301

CRITICAL

Centrifugo: SSRF via unverified JWT claims interpolated into dynamic JWKS endpoint URL

Also known asGHSA-j77h-rr39-c552GO-2026-4702
Published
Mar 12, 2026
Updated
Apr 10, 2026
Affected
5 pkgs
Patched
1 / 5
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk17th percentile+0.15%
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.3%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

5 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v6🐹github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo🐹github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v3🐹github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v4🐹github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v5

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Centrifugo is an open-source scalable real-time messaging server. Prior to 6.7.0, Centrifugo is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when configured with a dynamic JWKS endpoint URL using template variables (e.g. {{tenant}}). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a JWT with a malicious iss or aud claim value that gets interpolated into the JWKS fetch URL before the token signature is verified, causing Centrifugo to make an outbound HTTP request to an attacker-controlled destination. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.7.0.

Affected Packages

5 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v6all versions6.7.0
🐹Gogithub.com/centrifugal/centrifugoall versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v3all versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v4all versionsNo fix
🐹Gogithub.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v5all versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v6. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/centrifugal/centrifugo/v6 to 6.7.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32301 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-32301 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to CVE-2026-32301. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Centrifugo is an open-source scalable real-time messaging server. Prior to 6.7.0, Centrifugo is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when configured with a dynamic JWKS endpoint URL using template variables (e.g. {{tenant}}). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a JWT with a malicious iss or aud claim value that gets interpolated into the JWKS fetch URL before the token signature is verified, causing Centrifugo to make an outbound HTTP request to an attacker-controlled destination. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.7.0.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-32301 in your dependencies?

O3 detects CVE-2026-32301 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.