NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-29778 — pyload-ng

HIGH

CVE-2026-29778 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) CWE-23 vulnerability in pyload-ng. A fix is available for pyload-ng — see the affected versions and patch details below.

pyLoad has an Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal in edit_package()

Also known asPYSEC-2026-121
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-29778.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.03%
Lower risk than most CVEs47th percentile — riskier than 47% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.36%0.71%1.07%0.0%0.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍pyload-ng

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

The edit_package() function implements insufficient sanitization for the pack_folder parameter. The current protection relies on a single-pass string replacement of "../", which can be bypassed using crafted recursive traversal sequences.

Exploitation

An authenticated user with MODIFY permission can bypass the sanitization by submitting a payload such as: pack_folder=..././..././..././tmp

After the single-pass replacement, this becomes: ../../../tmp

Because the traversal sequences are not properly validated, the resulting normalized path escapes the intended storage directory and writes files to /tmp or other locations.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpyload-ng≥ 0.5.0b3.dev13&&< 0.5.0b3.dev970.5.0b3.dev97pip install --upgrade 'pyload-ng==0.5.0b3.dev97'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
pyload-ngpyload-ng_project
≥ 0.5.0b3.dev13 && < 0.5.0b3.dev97
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyload-ng, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev97 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-29778 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

The edit_package() function implements insufficient sanitization for the pack_folder parameter. The current protection relies on a single-pass string replacement of "../", which can be bypassed using crafted recursive traversal sequences. Exploitation An authenticated user with MODIFY permission can bypass the sanitization by submitting a payload such as: `pack_folder=..././..././..././tmp` After the single-pass replacement, this becomes: `../../../tmp` Because the traversal sequences are not properly validated, the resulting normalized path escapes the intended storage directory and write
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-29778 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-29778: pyload-ng — Fix Available