CVE-2026-29606 — openclaw
Fix: openclaw/openclaw@ff11d87CVE-2026-29606 is a Missing Authentication vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OpenClaw < 2026.2.14 - Webhook Signature Verification Bypass via ngrok Loopback Compatibility
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-29606.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
openclawnpmDescription
Summary
A Twilio webhook signature-verification bypass in the voice-call extension could allow unauthenticated webhook requests when a specific ngrok free-tier compatibility option is enabled.
Impact
This issue is limited to configurations that explicitly enable and expose the voice-call webhook endpoint.
Not affected by default:
- The voice-call extension is optional and disabled by default.
- The bypass only applied when
tunnel.allowNgrokFreeTierLoopbackBypasswas explicitly enabled. - Exploitation required the webhook to be reachable (typically via a public ngrok URL during development).
Worst case (when exposed and the option was enabled):
- An external attacker could send forged requests to the publicly reachable webhook endpoint that would be accepted without a valid
X-Twilio-Signature. - This could result in unauthorized webhook event handling (integrity) and request flooding (availability).
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected versions:
<= 2026.2.13(latest published as of 2026-02-14) - Patched versions:
>= 2026.2.14(planned next release; pending publish)
Fix
allowNgrokFreeTierLoopbackBypass no longer bypasses signature verification. It only enables trusting forwarded headers on loopback so the public ngrok URL can be reconstructed for correct signature validation.
Fix commit(s):
- ff11d8793b90c52f8d84dae3fbb99307da51b5c9
Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | openclaw | all versions | 2026.2.14npm install openclaw@2026.2.14 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update openclaw to 2026.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-29606 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-29606 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-29606. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-29606 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-29606 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.