CVE-2026-27626 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) OS Command Injection vulnerability in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin. A fix is available for github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OliveTin vulnerable to OS Command Injection via `password` argument type and webhook JSON extraction bypasses shell safety checks
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-27626.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/OliveTin/OliveTinReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
OliveTin's shell mode safety check (checkShellArgumentSafety) blocks several dangerous argument types but not password. A user supplying a password-typed argument can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary OS commands. A second independent vector allows unauthenticated RCE via webhook-extracted JSON values that skip type safety checks entirely before reaching sh -c.
Details
Vector 1 — password type bypasses shell safety check (PR:L)
service/internal/executor/arguments.go has two gaps:
// Line 198-199 — TypeSafetyCheck returns nil (no error) for password type
case "password":
return nil // accepts ANY string including ; | ` $()
// Line 313 — checkShellArgumentSafety blocks dangerous types but not password
unsafe := map[string]bool{
"url": true,
"email": true,
"raw_string_multiline": true,
"very_dangerous_raw_string": true,
// "password" is absent — not blocked
}
Shell execution at service/internal/executor/executor_unix.go:18:
exec.CommandContext(ctx, "sh", "-c", finalParsedCommand)
A user supplies a password argument value of '; id; echo ' → sh -c interprets the shell metacharacters → arbitrary command execution.
This is not the "admin already has access" pattern: OliveTin explicitly enforces an admin/user boundary where admins define commands and users only supply argument values. The password type is the documented, intended mechanism for user-supplied sensitive values. The safety check exists precisely to prevent users from escaping this boundary — password is the one type it fails to block.
Vector 2 — Webhook JSON extraction skips TypeSafetyCheck entirely (PR:N)
service/internal/executor/handler.go:153-157 extracts arbitrary key-value pairs from webhook JSON payloads and injects them into ExecutionRequest.Arguments. These webhook-extracted arguments have no corresponding config-defined ActionArgument entry, so parseActionArguments() in arguments.go finds no type to check against and skips TypeSafetyCheck entirely. The values are templated directly into the shell command and passed to sh -c.
Example: an admin command template git pull && echo {{ git_message }} with Shell mode enabled. A webhook POST with {"git_message": "x; id"} injects id into the shell command. The webhook endpoint is unauthenticated by default (authType: none in default config).
PoC
# Vector 1 — authenticated user with password-type argument
curl -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/StartAction \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"actionId": "run-command", "arguments": [{"name": "pass", "value": "'; id; echo '"}]}'
# Vector 2 — unauthenticated webhook
curl -X POST http://localhost:1337/webhook/git-deploy \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"git_message": "x; id #", "git_author": "attacker"}'
Confirmed on jamesread/olivetin:latest (3000.10.0), 3/3 runs. Both vectors produced uid=1000(olivetin) output and arbitrary file write to /tmp/pwned.
Impact
- Vector 1: Any authenticated user (registration enabled by default,
authType: noneby default) can execute arbitrary OS commands on the OliveTin host with the permissions of the OliveTin process. - Vector 2: Unauthenticated attacker can achieve the same if the instance receives webhooks from external sources, which is a primary OliveTin use case.
Combined: unauthenticated RCE on any OliveTin instance using Shell mode with webhook-triggered actions.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin | all versions | 0.0.0-20260222101908-4bbd2eab1532go get github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin@v0.0.0-20260222101908-4bbd2eab1532 |
Affected Products
olivetinolivetinDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin to 0.0.0-20260222101908-4bbd2eab1532 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-27626 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-27626 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.