Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-25479 litestar

MEDIUMFix: litestar-org/litestar@06b36f4

CVE-2026-25479 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-185 vulnerability in litestar. A fix is available for litestar — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Litestar has an AllowedHosts validation bypass due to unescaped regex metacharacters in configured host patterns

Also known asGHSA-93ph-p7v4-hwh4PYSEC-2026-2196
Published
Feb 9, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-25479.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs26th percentile — riskier than 26% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-25479 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍litestar

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

AllowedHosts host validation can be bypassed because configured host patterns are turned into regular expressions without escaping regex metacharacters (notably .). A configured allowlist entry like example.com can match exampleXcom

Details

In litestar.middleware.allowed_hosts, allowlist entries are compiled into regex patterns in a way that allows regex metacharacters to retain special meaning (e.g., . matches any character). This enables a bypass where an attacker supplies a host that matches the regex but is not the intended literal hostname.

PoC

Server (poc_allowed_hosts_server.py)

from litestar import Litestar, get
from litestar.middleware.allowed_hosts import AllowedHostsConfig

@get("/")
async def index() -> str:
    return "ok"

config = AllowedHostsConfig(allowed_hosts=["example.com"])
app = Litestar([index], allowed_hosts_config=config)

uvicorn poc_allowed_hosts_server:app --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8001

Client (poc_allowed_hosts_client.py)

import http.client

def req(host_header: str) -> tuple[int, bytes]:
    c = http.client.HTTPConnection("127.0.0.1", 8001, timeout=3)
    c.request("GET", "/", headers={"Host": host_header})
    r = c.getresponse()
    body = r.read()
    c.close()
    return r.status, body

print("evil.com:", *req("evil.com"))
print("exampleXcom:", *req("exampleXcom"))

Expected (vulnerable behavior): Host: evil.com → 400 invalid host

Host: exampleXcom → 200 ok (bypass)

Impact

Type: security control bypass (host allowlist) Who is impacted: apps relying on AllowedHosts to prevent Host header attacks (cache poisoning, absolute URL construction abuse, password reset link poisoning, etc.). The downstream impact depends on app behavior, but the bypass defeats a core mitigation layer.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlitestar2.19.0&&< 2.20.02.20.0pip install --upgrade 'litestar==2.20.0'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for litestar, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update litestar to 2.20.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-25479 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-25479 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-25479. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary AllowedHosts host validation can be bypassed because configured host patterns are turned into regular expressions without escaping regex metacharacters (notably .). A configured allowlist entry like example.com can match exampleXcom ### Details In litestar.middleware.allowed_hosts, allowlist entries are compiled into regex patterns in a way that allows regex metacharacters to retain special meaning (e.g., . matches any character). This enables a bypass where an attacker supplies a host that matches the regex but is not the intended literal hostname. ### PoC Server (poc_allowed_ho
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-25479 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-25479 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-25479: litestar (Medium 6.5) | O3 Security