NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-24420 — phpmyfaq

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-24420 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-284 vulnerability in phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. A fix is available for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq — see the affected versions and patch details below.

phpMyFAQ: Attachment download allowed without dlattachment right (broken access control)

Also known asGHSA-7p9h-m7m8-vhhv
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-24420.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs40th percentile — riskier than 40% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.32%0.64%0.96%0.0%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐘phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq🐘thorsten/phpmyfaq

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A logged‑in user without the dlattachment right can download FAQ attachments. This is due to a permissive permission check in attachment.php that treats the mere presence of a right key as authorization and a flawed group/user logic expression.

Details

In attachment.php, the access decision uses: ($groupPermission || ($groupPermission && $userPermission)) && isset($permission['dlattachment']) isset() returns true even when the right value is false, and the logic simplifies to $groupPermission for some permission modes. As a result, a user without dlattachment can still access the attachment.

PoC

Precondition: A non‑admin user exists; an attachment is associated to a FAQ record; records.allowDownloadsForGuests = false. Log in as a non‑admin user without dlattachment. Request the attachment download endpoint.

curl -c /tmp/pmf_api_cookies.txt \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"username":"tester","password":"Test1234!"}' \
  http://192.168.40.16/phpmyfaq/api/v3.0/login

curl -i -b /tmp/pmf_api_cookies.txt \
  "http://192.168.40.16/phpmyfaq/index.php?action=attachment&id=1"

Impact

Unauthorized users can download attachments (confidentiality breach). Depending on content, this may expose sensitive documents.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistphpmyfaq/phpmyfaqall versions4.0.17composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.0.17
🐘Packagistthorsten/phpmyfaqall versions4.0.17composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.0.17

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
phpmyfaqphpmyfaq
< 4.0.17
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq to 4.0.17 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-24420 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A logged‑in user without the dlattachment right can download FAQ attachments. This is due to a permissive permission check in attachment.php that treats the mere presence of a right key as authorization and a flawed group/user logic expression. ### Details In attachment.php, the access decision uses: ```($groupPermission || ($groupPermission && $userPermission)) && isset($permission['dlattachment'])``` isset() returns true even when the right value is false, and the logic simplifies to $groupPermission for some permission modes. As a result, a user without dlattachment can still a
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-24420 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-24420: phpmyfaq — Fixed in 4.0.17