NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-13318 — kubevirt

MEDIUMFix: kubevirt/kubevirt#18753

CVE-2026-13318 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.4) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in kubevirt.io/kubevirt. A fix is available for kubevirt.io/kubevirt — see the affected versions and patch details below.

KubeVirt virt-api port-forward handler vulnerable to SSRF via guest-controlled VMI IP address

Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-13318.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs15th percentile — riskier than 15% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.25%0.49%0.74%0.2%0.2%Jul 26Oct 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹kubevirt.io/kubevirt

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in KubeVirt's virt-api port-forward handler. When processing a port-forward request to a VirtualMachineInstance (VMI), virt-api reads the target IP from vmi.Status.Interfaces[0].IP and passes it directly to net.Dial() without validation. For VMIs using non-masquerade network bindings (bridge or secondary-only), this IP is reported by the QEMU guest agent running inside the VM and is fully controllable by the VM owner. An attacker with kubevirt.io:edit permissions can create a VM with a modified guest agent that reports an arbitrary IP address, then request port-forward to establish a bidirectional TCP tunnel from virt-api's cluster-internal network position to any routable destination, bypassing NetworkPolicy isolation.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gokubevirt.io/kubevirtall versions1.10.0-rc.0go get kubevirt.io/kubevirt@v1.10.0-rc.0

Affected Products

2 products · 2 configurations
Application
kubevirtkubevirt
all
Application
openshift virtualizationredhat
≥ 4 && ≤ 4.22.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for kubevirt.io/kubevirt, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update kubevirt.io/kubevirt to 1.10.0-rc.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-13318 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Red Hat has rated this issue as Moderate impact. Only VMs configured with bridge binding or secondary-only network interfaces (which require a cluster administrator to have created a NetworkAttachmentDefinition) are affected.

Workaround published by Red Hat
Users who do not use bridge binding or secondary-only network interfaces for their VMs are not affected by this vulnerability. For environments using these configurations, cluster administrators can apply egress NetworkPolicy to the openshift-cnv namespace to restrict virt-api's outbound connections to known-legitimate destinations (launcher pod CIDRs and node IPs), which blocks the SSRF to arbitrary targets.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-13318 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw was found in KubeVirt's virt-api port-forward handler. When processing a port-forward request to a VirtualMachineInstance (VMI), virt-api reads the target IP from vmi.Status.Interfaces[0].IP and passes it directly to net.Dial() without validation. For VMIs using non-masquerade network bindings (bridge or secondary-only), this IP is reported by the QEMU guest agent running inside the VM and is fully controllable by the VM owner. An attacker with kubevirt.io:edit permissions can create a VM with a modified guest agent that reports an arbitrary IP address
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-13318 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-13318: kubevirt SSRF — Fixed in 1.10.0-rc.0