NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-1287 — django

MEDIUMFix: django/django@e891a84

CVE-2026-1287 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) SQL Injection vulnerability in django. A fix is available for django — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Potential SQL injection in column aliases via control characters

Also known asBIT-django-2026-1287GHSA-gvg8-93h5-g6qqPYSEC-2026-46
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-1287.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs58th percentile — riskier than 58% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.45%0.90%1.34%0.0%0.8%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐍django🐍django🐍django

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. FilteredRelation is subject to SQL injection in column aliases via control characters, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to QuerySet methods annotate(), aggregate(), extra(), values(), values_list(), and alias(). Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Solomon Kebede for reporting this issue.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 6.0a1&&< 6.0.26.0.2pip install --upgrade 'django==6.0.2'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 5.2a1&&< 5.2.115.2.11pip install --upgrade 'django==5.2.11'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 4.2a1&&< 4.2.284.2.28pip install --upgrade 'django==4.2.28'

Affected Products

1 product · 3 configurations
Application
djangodjangoproject
≥ 6.0 && < 6.0.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for django, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update django to 6.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-1287 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This IMPORTANT SQL injection flaw in Django allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands by crafting column aliases. This vulnerability affects Red Hat products that incorporate Django, such as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Red Hat Discovery, Red Hat Satellite, Insights, and Ansible Services,…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-1287 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8python3.12-django-0:4.2.28-1.el8apRHSA-2026:3959
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9python3.12-django-0:4.2.28-1.el9apRHSA-2026:3958
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8python-django-0:4.2.28-0.1.el8pcRHSA-2026:5971
Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9foreman-0:3.14.0.14-1.el9satRHSA-2026:5970
Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9python3.12-django-0:4.2.30-1.el9pcRHSA-2026:14835
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8:1772214630RHSA-2026:3962
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6ansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-rhel9:1772552788RHSA-2026:3960
Red Hat Discovery 2discovery/discovery-server-rhel9:1770913597RHSA-2026:2694
UbuntuMEDIUM

Frequently Asked Questions

An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. `FilteredRelation` is subject to SQL injection in column aliases via control characters, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the `**kwargs` passed to `QuerySet` methods `annotate()`, `aggregate()`, `extra()`, `values()`, `values_list()`, and `alias()`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Solomon Kebede for reporting this issue.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-1287 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-1287: django SQL Injection — Fixed in 6.0.2