CVE-2026-111761 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common. A fix is available for org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common — see the affected versions and patch details below.
A2A Java SDK has Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in push-notification delivery
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-111761.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-111761 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-commonReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
- Ecosystem: Maven
- Affected package:
org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common(push-notification delivery) - Affected versions:
<= 1.2.0.Final(and1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOTonmainprior to the fix) - Patched version: (the release that carries the fix)
- CWE: CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery)
- Severity: High
- CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N(5.8, Moderate)
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can coerce the a2a-java server into issuing HTTP requests to arbitrary internal and cloud-metadata endpoints from the server's own network position — a Server-Side Request Forgery reachable in the default deployment with no credentials, no user interaction, and a single request. The behaviour is the shipped default, not a misconfiguration.
Details
BasePushNotificationSender (in server-common) POSTs task data to the URL stored on a task's
TaskPushNotificationConfig with no validation of the destination: no block on loopback, RFC1918,
link-local (169.254.0.0/16, including the 169.254.169.254 metadata address), unique-local,
unspecified, or multicast ranges; no scheme restriction; and no bound on redirects.
InMemoryPushNotificationConfigStore.setInfo stores the URL verbatim and
onCreateTaskPushNotificationConfig does not check it either.
Both shipped HTTP clients follow redirects (JdkA2AHttpClient → followRedirects(NORMAL),
VertxA2AHttpClient → setFollowRedirects(true)), so a creation-time URL allowlist is bypassable:
an attacker webhook answers 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/... and the client follows it. A
hostname check is likewise defeated by DNS rebinding. A correct guard must validate the resolved
IP of every hop at connection time, not the URL string.
Exploitation
Demonstrated end-to-end against a running server (default wiring, unauthenticated caller):
- Arbitrary internal reachability. The attacker picks the destination and the server issues
the request from inside the trust boundary. Delivery to loopback and to a real RFC1918 LAN
address was exercised at runtime; because the code applies no destination filtering of any kind,
the same path reaches link-local / metadata (
169.254.169.254) and other internal ranges wherever network routing permits. - Allowlist + method bypass via redirect. A
302from the attacker's webhook reaches destinations a creation-time allowlist would block, and a302on aPOSTis followed as aGET— so GET-only endpoints such as the IMDS credentials path are reachable even though the sender only issuesPOSTs. This is why a URL allowlist is not a sufficient fix; the guard must validate the resolved IP of every redirect hop. - Data push into internal services. On direct (non-redirected) delivery, each request carries
the task payload in the body, so internal services that ingest POST data receive
attacker-influenced content (basis for
I:L). On a redirected request the body is dropped in the POST→GET conversion, so the body-push and the redirect-reach are separate capabilities, not simultaneous on one request.
The sender discards the fetched response and exposes no caller-visible difference between a
successful and a failed delivery (both paths return without surfacing status or body), so the base
case reads back nothing — confidentiality is scored C:N. Read-back is limited, reach is not: the
attacker still drives fully controlled requests to metadata and internal services and writes data
into them.
PoC
Against a running server with push notifications enabled (JSON-RPC transport), using only the real production classes wired the default way:
-
Start a local listener standing in for an internal target (no real metadata service is touched).
-
Send one
SendMessagethat starts a long-running task, with the push config inlined and itsurlset tohttp://<internal-target>/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/. UsereturnImmediately: true, headerA2A-Version: 1.0, and roleROLE_USER. The URL is stored verbatim. (Equivalent viaCreateTaskPushNotificationConfigon an existing task.) -
As the task emits state/artifact updates, the sender POSTs each one to the stored URL, from the server's own network position:
POST /latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ HTTP/1.1 Host: 169.254.169.254 Content-Type: application/json {"artifactUpdate":{"taskId":"...","artifact":{"parts":[{"text":"Progress update 1/20"}]}, ...}}
One SendMessage produced multiple server-side POSTs to the attacker-chosen internal path.
Verified on main (commit 72d220c, JDK 21) and unchanged on 1.2.0.Final.
Remediation
Validate the resolved IP of the target and of every redirect hop before connecting: reject
loopback / RFC1918 / link-local / metadata / unique-local / unspecified / multicast; restrict the
scheme to http/https; cap redirects; and resolve-and-pin to defeat DNS rebinding. Enable by
default, with a documented opt-out for deployments that intentionally target internal webhooks. The
Go A2A SDK ships a dial-time resolved-IP guard of this shape by default.
Workaround: until a fixed release, block the host's outbound egress to the metadata endpoint and internal ranges at the network layer.
References
- CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common | all versions | 1.3.0.Finalorg.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common:1.3.0.Final |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common to 1.3.0.Final or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-111761 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-111761 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.