CVE-2026-107220 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in github.com/xuri/excelize/v2. A fix is available for github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Excelize: Panic in cellInRange on a worksheet with an empty mergeCell ref
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-107220.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-107220 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/xuri/excelize/v2Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A worksheet containing <mergeCell ref=""/> makes mergeCellsParser leave the cached rectangle empty, and cellInRange then indexes that empty slice without a length check. Every non-streaming cell API panics with index out of range [0] with length 0 on the first cell read after opening the file.
Where it is
cell.go, cellInRange
func cellInRange(cell, ref []int) bool {
return cell[0] >= ref[0] && cell[0] <= ref[2] && cell[1] >= ref[1] && cell[1] <= ref[3]
}
ref is indexed at four positions with no bounds check.
The caller that can hand it an empty slice, mergeCellsParser
if ref := ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].Ref; len(ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect) == 0 && ref != "" {
if strings.Count(ref, ":") != 1 {
ref += ":" + ref
}
rect, err := rangeRefToCoordinates(ref)
if err != nil {
return cell, err
}
_ = sortCoordinates(rect)
ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect = rect
}
if cellInRange([]int{col, row}, ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect) {
The ref != "" condition means an empty ref skips the block that populates rect, so rect stays nil. The cellInRange call on the next line is unconditional and receives that nil slice.
Ref comes straight from xl/worksheets/sheetN.xml through encoding/xml, so an empty string is entirely attacker-controlled.
Impact
Any consumer that opens an untrusted workbook and reads a cell panics. The loop scans every merged cell, so any cell reference triggers it, not a specific one. Affected entry points include GetCellValue, GetCellType, GetCellFormula, SetCellValue and the in-cell branch of GetPictures. The streaming Rows and GetRows use the SAX path and do not go through this parser, and GetMergeCells routes through Rect() which errors cleanly, which is probably why this has not surfaced before.
There is no option or flag involved; opening the file succeeds and the panic fires on the first cell read. Unless the caller wraps the call in recover() it takes the process down.
This is a regression. Commit a34c81e (PR #1500, 2023-03-20) replaced checkCellInRangeRef, whose len(rng) != 2 guard returned cleanly for an empty ref, with the cached-rect fast path above, and the guard did not come along. git merge-base --is-ancestor confirms that commit is an ancestor of v2.11.0, so released versions are affected as well as HEAD.
Proof of concept
Executed at HEAD.
Build a minimal xlsx whose xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml contains:
<mergeCells count="1"><mergeCell ref=""></mergeCell></mergeCells>
Then:
f, err := excelize.OpenReader(bytes.NewReader(data))
if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) }
_, _ = f.GetCellValue("Sheet1", "A1")
Observed, running against the repository at HEAD:
panic: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0
excelize.cellInRange cell.go:1691
excelize.(*xlsxWorksheet).mergeCellsParser cell.go:1660
excelize.(*File).getCellStringFunc cell.go:1512
excelize.(*File).GetCellValue cell.go:72
OpenReader itself returns no error; the file is 1656 bytes. A1, B1 and A2 all reproduce it.
For context on how targeted this is, I ran a battery of 38 crafted files covering data validation, conditional formatting, cell and row references, number formats, cols, hyperlinks, dimension, shared strings and tables. Only the empty-ref merge cell panicked; everything else returned a clean error. The other parsing paths look well guarded.
Suggested fix
Skip the entry when the rectangle is empty, before the range test:
if len(ws.MergeCells.Cells[i].rect) == 0 {
continue
}
Credit goes to arpitjain099.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 | ≥ 2.7.1&&< 2.11.1-0.20260820023833-99903a3240e5 | 2.11.1-0.20260820023833-99903a3240e5go get github.com/xuri/excelize/v2@v2.11.1-0.20260820023833-99903a3240e5 |
Affected Products
excelizeexcelizeDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/xuri/excelize/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 to 2.11.1-0.20260820023833-99903a3240e5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-107220 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-107220 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.