CVE-2026-104855 — wasmtime
Fix: bytecodealliance/wasmtime@3ebfbe5CVE-2026-104855 is a CWE-362 vulnerability in wasmtime. A fix is available for wasmtime — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Wasmtime: Preemption and traps during bulk operations enable breaking internal VM state
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-104855.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
wasmtime🦀wasmtimeReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
Wasmtime's implementation of bulk-data-transfer WebAssembly instructions, such as memory.copy, contains a vulnerability when a preemption via epochs or fuel is combined with altering the store's state or cancelling a computation. To prevent these operations from taking too long Wasmtime injects fuel/epoch checks during these operations, but this enables embedders, and possible WebAssembly, to witness intermediate state in the middle of the operation. Examples of this include:
- When a non-nullable WebAssembly table is grown the new elements initially start as null and are filled in as part of a loop with preemption checks. If this computation is then cancelled this left the table in a grown-but-uninitialized state where subsequent usage via WebAssembly could possibly segfault. Loads from this table are assumed to not be null due to its type, but the runtime implementation was exposed through this cancellation at a preemption point.
- Embedders could mutate the store during an epoch callback, such as growing a WebAssembly linear memory. During a bulk
memory.copyoperation, however, the pointers being copied to/from weren't recomputed between preemption points. This meant that if the linear memory moved its base address it could be possible to have a preemption, the embedder manually grows memory, and then on resumption the copy operation uses invalid pointers. - Embedders could execute a GC during epoch callbacks. GC operations such as
array.copy, likememory.copyabove, maintained raw pointers internally in the operation which were not updated after the preemption point. This could lead to corruption of the GC heap.
All of these situations are examples of embedder-driven mutations of the Store or embedder-induced resumption of a Store after a computation was cancelled. These operations expose the internal state of these WebAssembly operations which is semantically incorrect and additionally can cause segfaults for example. Exposing these bugs, however, requires explicit patterns to be present in the embedding itself such as using Store::epoch_deadline_callback and mutating wasm options. Another example is to cancel one invocation (possibly in a table.grow) and then execute more wasm afterwards within the same store. Embeddings not using Store::epoch_deadline_callback or executing code after timeouts/fuel are not affected by this issue.
Patches
This issue is fixed in Wasmtime 46.0.2 and 47.0.3. In these versions Wasmtime reverts back to Wasmtime 45-and-earlier behavior for these operations to check fuel once before the operation and then not during the operation. This means that a very large memory.copy does not have preemption points in the middle of the operation any more, for example.
Workarounds
Embedders using Store::epoch_deadline_callback are safe if they only access the T in Store<T>. Embedders that do not continue using a store after a timeout or epoch deadline are also unaffected. Embedders which explicitly mutate the store in an epoch callback, or resume wasm after trapping have no workaround however. The embedding needs to be updated to account for this issue.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | wasmtime | ≥ 46.0.0&&< 46.0.2 | 46.0.2cargo update -p wasmtime --precise 46.0.2 |
| 🦀crates.io | wasmtime | ≥ 47.0.0&&< 47.0.3 | 47.0.3cargo update -p wasmtime --precise 47.0.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wasmtime, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update wasmtime to 46.0.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-104855 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is rated as Moderate rather than Important because triggering the flaw requires non-standard host embedding behavior and local interaction with the WebAssembly runtime environment. Exploitation depends on an application deliberately mutating runtime store state during preemption events or resuming…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-104855 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-104855 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.