CVE-2026-104795 — Red Hat

The insights-runtime-extractor runs as a privileged DaemonSet (hostPID: true) that scans container processes for runtime fingerprinting. When scanning a container, the coordinator:

1. fork()s a child process
2. setns() into the target container's PID and mount namespaces
3. fchdir() back to an orphaned FD pointing at the extractor's own root filesystem (where /crio.sock is hostPath-mounted)
4. Calls only seteuid(target_uid) — changing the effective UID but leaving the real UID and saved-set-UID at 0 and retaining the permitted capability set
5. The check_no_privileged_perms() guard inspects only the Effective capability set (so it passes), and is skipped entirely when the target runs as uid 0
6. The VersionExecutable fingerprint invokes fpr_kind_executable with process.command_line[0] — the target's argv[0], read from /proc/<pid>/cmdline and fully controlled by the workload
7. fpr_kind_executable calls exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output() — executing the workload's own binary inside the workload's mount namespace while ruid=0 in the host user namespace

The executed process can call setuid(0) to restore full root with CAP_SYS_ADMIN, and inherits the orphaned cwd which resolves into the extractor container's filesystem containing the host CRI-O socket.

Affected Code

1. Insufficient privilege drop (Rust — extractor coordinator)

File: extractor/src/insights_runtime_extractor.rs

// Lines 139-146 — seteuid-only drop, guard skipped for root containers
join_process_namespaces(process.pid)?;
change_dir(current_dir);
switch_user(*process.uid)?;
if *process.uid != 0 {
    perms::check_no_privileged_perms()
        .expect("Must not have privileged permissions to run fingerprints");
}
fingerprint::run_fingerprints(&config, out_dir, &process);

// Lines 182-185 — only effective UID changed; ruid/suid stay 0
fn switch_user(uid: u32) -> Result<(), ScannerError> {
    debug!("... Becoming user: {uid}");
    seteuid(uid.into()).map_err(|e| ScannerError::Errno(e))
}

2. Execution of untrusted binary (Go — fingerprint)

File: fingerprints/pkg/utils/file.go

// Lines 75-80 — executes a path taken verbatim from workload's argv[0]
func GetExecutableVersionOutput(executable string) (string, error) {
    out, err := exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output()
    if err != nil {
        return "", err
    }
    return string(out), nil
}

3. Workload-controlled path forwarded (Rust — version_executable)

File: version_executable.rs

// Lines 29-34 — workload-controlled command_line[0] forwarded to fingerprint
return Some(vec![
    fpr_kind_executable,
    out_dir.to_string(),
    String::from(&process.command_line[0]),
    String::from(&version_executable.runtime_kind_name),
]);

Attack Pattern

Attacker: Any tenant able to schedule a pod (unprivileged, any namespace) Victim: The node running the insights-runtime-extractor DaemonSet Trigger: Automatic — the DaemonSet scans all container processes on the node

Attack sequence:

1. Attacker creates a pod whose process name matches a configured versioned-executable pattern (node, python, python3, MainThread, or contains java)
2. The pod's main binary (at the path matching argv[0]) is a malicious executable that calls setuid(0) to restore root
3. When the insights operator triggers a scan, the DaemonSet forks, enters the attacker's mount namespace, and executes the attacker's binary with ruid=0
4. The attacker's code regains full root with CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the host user namespace
5. The inherited cwd contains the host CRI-O socket → full node compromise