CVE-2025-66299 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Code Injection vulnerability in getgrav/grav. A fix is available for getgrav/grav — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Security Sandbox Bypass with SSTI (Server Side Template Injection) in the Grav CMS
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-66299.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-66299 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
getgrav/gravReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Grav CMS is vulnerable to a Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) that allows any authenticated user with editor permissions to execute arbitrary code on the remote server, bypassing the existing security sandbox.
Details
Grav CMS uses a custom sandbox to protect the powerful Twig methods such as registerUndefinedFilterCallback(). These methods are designed to prevent SSTI attacks by denying the execution of dangerous PHP functions (e.g., exec(), passthru(), system(), etc.) within Twig template directives.
The current defense mechanism relies on a blacklist of prohibited functions (PHP, Twig), checked through the isDangerousFunction() method in the file system/src/Grav/Common/Twig.php:
$this->twig->registerUndefinedFilterCallback(function (string $name) use ($config) {
$allowed = $config->get('system.twig.safe_filters');
if (is_array($allowed) && in_array($name, $allowed, true) && function_exists($name)) {
return new TwigFilter($name, $name);
}
if ($config->get('system.twig.undefined_filters')) {
if (function_exists($name)) {
if (!Utils::isDangerousFunction($name)) {
user_error("PHP function {$name}() used as Twig filter. This is deprecated in Grav 1.7. Please add it to system configuration: `system.twig.safe_filters`", E_USER_DEPRECATED);
return new TwigFilter($name, $name);
}
/** @var Debugger $debugger */
$debugger = $this->grav['debugger'];
$debugger->addException(new RuntimeException("Blocked potentially dangerous PHP function {$name}() being used as Twig filter. If you really want to use it, please add it to system configuration: `system.twig.safe_filters`"));
}
return new TwigFilter($name, static function () {});
}
return false;
});
In this code, the isDangerousFunction() check is bypassed if the filter defined in the $name variable is considered safe. Only an administrator can mark a function as safe by adding it to the system.twig.safe_filters configuration properties (whitelists that are empty by default) in the system/config/system.yaml file.
Notably, the Twig class is defined within the system/src/Grav/Common/Twig.php file, and the Twig object (and environment) is instantiated there:
/**
* Class Twig
* @package Grav\Common\Twig
*/
class Twig
{
/** @var Environment */
public $twig;
/** @var array */
public $twig_vars = [];
/** @var array */
public $twig_paths;
/** @var string */
public $template;
// Constructor
public function __construct(Grav $grav)
{
$this->grav = $grav;
$this->twig_paths = [];
}
// Twig initialization method
public function init()
{
if (null === $this->twig) {
/** @var Config $config */
$config = $this->grav['config'];
/** @var UniformResourceLocator $locator */
$locator = $this->grav['locator'];
/** @var Language $language */
$language = $this->grav['language'];
$active_language = $language->getActive();
...
}
}
}
Since the security sandbox does not fully protect the Twig object, it is possible to interact with it (e.g., call methods, read/write attributes) through maliciously crafted Twig template directives injected into a web page. This allows an authenticated editor to add arbitrary functions to the Twig attribute system.twig.safe_filters, effectively bypassing the Grav CMS sandbox.
Proof of Concept (PoC)
An authenticated user with permission to edit a page (with Twig processing enabled) in the Grav CMS admin console can inject malicious template directives to execute arbitrary OS commands on the remote web server.
For example, to exploit the vulnerability and execute the prohibited system('id') command, bypassing the sandbox, an editor could create/edit a web page with the following template directives:
{% set arr = {'1':'system', '2':'exec'} %}
{{ var_dump(grav.twig.twig_vars['config'].set('system.twig.safe_filters', arr)) }}
{{ 'id'|system }}
{{ 'whoami'|exec }}
Once the page is saved, it can be accessed by unauthenticated users, triggering the execution of the system('id') command on the server hosting the vulnerable Grav CMS.
Impact
The vulnerability allows remote code execution on the underlying server, which could lead to full server compromise.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | getgrav/grav | all versions | 1.8.0-beta.27composer require getgrav/grav:^1.8.0-beta.27 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for getgrav/grav, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update getgrav/grav to 1.8.0-beta.27 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-66299 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-66299 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-66299. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-66299 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-66299 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.