CVE-2025-64175 — gogs
Fix: gogs/gogs@a617d52CVE-2025-64175 is a Improper Authentication vulnerability in gogs.io/gogs. A fix is available for gogs.io/gogs — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Gogs Vulnerable to 2FA Bypass via Recovery Code
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-64175.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
gogs.io/gogsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Contact OpenAI Security Research at [email protected] to engage on this report.
See PDF report for easier reading.
Security Advisory: 2FA Bypass via Recovery Code Vulnerability Type: 2FA Authentication Bypass Affected Software: GOGS Severity: High Date: Aug 5, 2025 Discoverer: OpenAI Security Research Summary Gogs’ 2FA recovery code validation does not scope codes by user, enabling cross-account bypass. If an attacker knows a victim’s username and password, they can use Security Advisory_ 2FA Bypass via Recovery Code - Google Docs.pdf any unused recovery code (e.g., from their own account) to bypass the victim’s 2FA. This enables full account takeover and renders 2FA ineffective in all environments where it's enabled. Affected Versions Software: Gogs Confirmed Version(s): All versions with 2FA support Likely Affected: All versions since introduction of UseRecoveryCode logic Introduced Commit: a617d52374e937db0edacfba2a26bdd14a05538e Commit: a617d52374e937db0edacfba2a26bdd14a05538e Author: Joe Chen Date: Apr 5, 2017 Description: 2fa: initial support
Vulnerability Details The function UseRecoveryCode in internal/database/two_factor.go fails to check that the recovery code belongs to the authenticating user. Instead, it looks for any unused recovery code: Vulnerable Code Snippet
func UseRecoveryCode(_ int64, code string) error {
recoveryCode := new(TwoFactorRecoveryCode)
has, err := x.Where("code = ?", code).And("is_used = ?", false).Get(recoveryCode)
...
}
Although the caller passes userID, it is ignored. The result is a global lookup for any unused code, allowing an attacker to submit their own recovery code during another user's login flow.
Call Chain
web login handler → UseRecoveryCode(userID, code) → DB query without userID constraint Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Description This bug is tested against the latest version of Gogs hosted on Dockerhub. Attacker uses their own recovery code to bypass another user’s 2FA. Steps Create attacker account A and enable 2FA. Save a code like "abcde-fghij". Obtain credentials for victim B. Attempt login as B via web. When prompted for recovery code, submit A's code. Login as B succeeds; A's code is marked as used.
Impact 2FA rendered ineffective for all users Realistic Exploitation Scenarios Public Gogs instances with 2FA enabled Developer or maintainer accounts Enterprise self-hosted Gogs servers Potential Impact This vulnerability critically undermines 2FA. Since recovery codes are not globally unique and lack user scoping, any attacker with victim credentials can use one of their own recovery codes to complete login as the victim — bypassing all 2FA protections. This opens the door to account hijacking, data exfiltration, and downstream supply chain compromise. Timeline August 2025: Discovered via GPT5 August 2025: Reproduced and confirmed via PoC and sanitizer Aug 6, 2025 - Sent to Gogs via https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/new
This information is being shared by OpenAI solely for the purpose of improving security and reducing potential harm. This information is presented as-is. OpenAI Security Research makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information. [This includes, without limitation any suggestions or ideas presented on how to remedy or mitigate an identified vulnerability, including whether such suggestions or ideas would be effective and/or could have other negative impacts.] OpenAI disclaims any liability for direct or indirect damages arising from the reliance on, or use, misuse, or interpretation of this information. Any references to third-party systems, services, or entities are included solely for identification purposes and do not imply endorsement, responsibility, or attribution.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | gogs.io/gogs | ≥ 0.11.19&&< 0.13.4 | 0.13.4go get gogs.io/gogs@v0.13.4 |
Affected Products
gogsgogsDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gogs.io/gogs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gogs.io/gogs to 0.13.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-64175 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-64175 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.