NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2025-62718 — axios

Fix: axios/axios@03cdfc9

CVE-2025-62718 is a CWE-441 vulnerability in axios. A fix is available for axios — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF

Also known asGHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-62718.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.02%
Lower risk than most CVEs68th percentile — riskier than 68% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.57%1.14%1.71%0.0%1.2%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

180Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
axiosnpm
144.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules. Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy.

This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services.

According to RFC 1034 §3.1 and RFC 3986 §3.2.2, a hostname can have a trailing dot to show it is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). At the DNS level, localhost. is the same as localhost. However, Axios does a literal string comparison instead of normalizing hostnames before checking NO_PROXY. This causes requests like http://localhost.:8080/ and http://[::1]:8080/ to be incorrectly proxied.

This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections.


PoC

import http from "http";
import axios from "axios";

const proxyPort = 5300;

http.createServer((req, res) => {
  console.log("[PROXY] Got:", req.method, req.url, "Host:", req.headers.host);
  res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "text/plain" });
  res.end("proxied");
}).listen(proxyPort, () => console.log("Proxy", proxyPort));

process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxyPort}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1";

async function test(url) {
  try {
    await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
  } catch {}
}

setTimeout(async () => {
  console.log("\n[*] Testing http://localhost.:8080/");
  await test("http://localhost.:8080/"); // goes through proxy

  console.log("\n[*] Testing http://[::1]:8080/");
  await test("http://[::1]:8080/"); // goes through proxy
}, 500);

Expected: Requests bypass the proxy (direct to loopback). Actual: Proxy logs requests for localhost. and [::1].


Impact

  • Applications that rely on NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 for protecting loopback/internal access are vulnerable.

  • Attackers controlling request URLs can:

    • Force Axios to send local traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy.
    • Bypass SSRF mitigations relying on NO_PROXY rules.
    • Potentially exfiltrate sensitive responses from internal services via the proxy.

Affected Versions

  • Confirmed on Axios 1.12.2 (latest at time of testing).
  • affects all versions that rely on Axios’ current NO_PROXY evaluation.

Remediation Axios should normalize hostnames before evaluating NO_PROXY, including:

  • Strip trailing dots from hostnames (per RFC 3986).
  • Normalize IPv6 literals by removing brackets for matching.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmaxios≥ 1.0.0&&< 1.15.01.15.0npm install axios@1.15.0
📦npmaxiosall versions0.31.0npm install axios@0.31.0

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
axiosaxios
≥ 1.0.0 && < 1.15.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for axios, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update axios to 1.15.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-62718 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This flaw has limited impact due to combination of non-default conditions to exploit: the attacker must be able to control or influence URLs passed to axios in a server-side context, the application must have both `HTTP_PROXY` and `NO_PROXY` configured, and the proxy itself must be positioned to act on the misdirected…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2025-62718 (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8automation-gateway-0:2.5.20260422-3.el8apRHSA-2026:24761
Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0axiosRHSA-2026:13571
Cluster Observability Operator 1.5cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-pf4-rhel9:1781116645RHSA-2026:26010
multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778511348RHSA-2026:17657
multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778383863RHSA-2026:17699
Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.0network-observability/network-observability-console-plugin-compat-rhel9:1778508956RHSA-2026:16874
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14rhacm2/console-rhel9:1783451729RHSA-2026:36882
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1779371594RHSA-2026:20938

Frequently Asked Questions

Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking `NO_PROXY` rules. Requests to loopback addresses like `localhost.` (with a trailing dot) or `[::1]` (IPv6 literal) skip `NO_PROXY` matching and go through the configured proxy. This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if `NO_PROXY` is set up to protect loopback or internal services. According to [RFC 1034 §3.1](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#section-3.1) and [RFC 3986 §3.2.2](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2), a hostname can ha
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-62718 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-62718: axios SSRF — Fixed in 1.15.0