CVE-2025-62718 — axios
Fix: axios/axios@03cdfc9CVE-2025-62718 is a CWE-441 vulnerability in axios. A fix is available for axios — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-62718.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
axiosnpmDescription
Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules.
Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy.
This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services.
According to RFC 1034 §3.1 and RFC 3986 §3.2.2, a hostname can have a trailing dot to show it is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). At the DNS level, localhost. is the same as localhost.
However, Axios does a literal string comparison instead of normalizing hostnames before checking NO_PROXY. This causes requests like http://localhost.:8080/ and http://[::1]:8080/ to be incorrectly proxied.
This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections.
PoC
import http from "http";
import axios from "axios";
const proxyPort = 5300;
http.createServer((req, res) => {
console.log("[PROXY] Got:", req.method, req.url, "Host:", req.headers.host);
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "text/plain" });
res.end("proxied");
}).listen(proxyPort, () => console.log("Proxy", proxyPort));
process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxyPort}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1";
async function test(url) {
try {
await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
} catch {}
}
setTimeout(async () => {
console.log("\n[*] Testing http://localhost.:8080/");
await test("http://localhost.:8080/"); // goes through proxy
console.log("\n[*] Testing http://[::1]:8080/");
await test("http://[::1]:8080/"); // goes through proxy
}, 500);
Expected: Requests bypass the proxy (direct to loopback).
Actual: Proxy logs requests for localhost. and [::1].
Impact
-
Applications that rely on
NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1for protecting loopback/internal access are vulnerable. -
Attackers controlling request URLs can:
- Force Axios to send local traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy.
- Bypass SSRF mitigations relying on NO_PROXY rules.
- Potentially exfiltrate sensitive responses from internal services via the proxy.
Affected Versions
- Confirmed on Axios 1.12.2 (latest at time of testing).
- affects all versions that rely on Axios’ current
NO_PROXYevaluation.
Remediation
Axios should normalize hostnames before evaluating NO_PROXY, including:
- Strip trailing dots from hostnames (per RFC 3986).
- Normalize IPv6 literals by removing brackets for matching.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | axios | ≥ 1.0.0&&< 1.15.0 | 1.15.0npm install axios@1.15.0 |
| 📦npm | axios | all versions | 0.31.0npm install axios@0.31.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for axios, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update axios to 1.15.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-62718 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-62718 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-62718. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This flaw has limited impact due to combination of non-default conditions to exploit: the attacker must be able to control or influence URLs passed to axios in a server-side context, the application must have both `HTTP_PROXY` and `NO_PROXY` configured, and the proxy itself must be positioned to act on the misdirected…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | automation-gateway-0:2.5.20260422-3.el8ap | RHSA-2026:24761 |
| Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0 | axios | RHSA-2026:13571 |
| Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0 | cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-pf4-rhel9:1781116645 | RHSA-2026:26010 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778511348 | RHSA-2026:17657 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1778383863 | RHSA-2026:17699 |
| Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.0 | network-observability/network-observability-console-plugin-compat-rhel9:1778508956 | RHSA-2026:16874 |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14 | rhacm2/console-rhel9:1783451729 | RHSA-2026:36882 |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9 | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1779371594 | RHSA-2026:20938 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-62718 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-62718 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.