CVE-2025-62515 — pyquokka
CRITICALCVE-2025-62515 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in pyquokka. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
pyquokka is Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution by Pickle Deserialization via FlightServer
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-62515.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-62515 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
pyquokkaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Description
In the FlightServer class of the pyquokka framework, the do_action() method directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation, which results in a remote code execution vulnerability. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283, where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads().
Even more concerning, when FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0 (as shown in the provided server example at line 339), this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action.
In addition, the functions cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get also contain vulnerability points where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data. Please review and fix these issues accordingly. This report uses the set_configs action as an example.
Proof of Concept
- Step 1: The victim user starts a FlightServer that binds to the network interface, e.g.:
server = FlightServer("0.0.0.0", location = "grpc+tcp://0.0.0.0:5005")
server.serve()
- Step 2: The attacker can then send malicious pickle dump data through the Flight client connection. The provided PoC demonstrates how an attacker can execute "ls -l" command:
class RCE:
def __reduce__(self):
import os
return (os.system, ('ls -l',))
import pickle
action_body = pickle.dumps(RCE())
action = pyarrow.flight.Action("set_configs", action_body)
When the server receives this payload, the FlightServer.do_action() method calls pickle.loads(action.body.to_pybytes()) on line 283, which triggers the execution of the malicious code through Python's pickle deserialization mechanism. The provided flight_client.py demonstrates a complete PoC that connects to the vulnerable server and executes arbitrary commands through the pickle deserialization vulnerability.
When the vulnerability is reproduced, python flight.py can be run to init the server and then run flight_client.py. There is an attack demo in the attachment.
Impact
Remote code execution on the victim's machine over the network. Once the victim starts the FlightServer with network binding (especially 0.0.0.0), an attacker on the network can gain arbitrary code execution by connecting to the Flight endpoint and sending crafted pickle payloads through the set_configs action. This vulnerability allows for:
- Complete system compromise
- Data exfiltration
- Lateral movement within the network
- Denial of service attacks
- Installation of persistent backdoors
Mitigation
-
Replace unsafe deserialization: Replace
pickle.loads()with safer alternatives such as:- JSON serialization for simple data structures
- Protocol Buffers or MessagePack for complex data
- If pickle must be used, implement a custom
Unpicklerwith a restrictedfind_class()method that only allows whitelisted classes
-
Network security:
- If the service is intended for internal use only, bind to localhost (
127.0.0.1) instead of0.0.0.0 - Implement authentication and authorization mechanisms
- If the service is intended for internal use only, bind to localhost (
-
Security warnings: When starting the service on public interfaces, display clear security warnings to inform users about the risks.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pyquokka | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyquokka, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of pyquokka has shipped for CVE-2025-62515 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-62515 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-62515. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-62515 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-62515 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.