CVE-2025-58162 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in mobsf. A fix is available for mobsf — see the affected versions and patch details below.
MobSF Vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write (AR-Slip) via Absolute Path in .a Extraction
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-58162.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-58162 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
mobsfReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The vulnerability allows any user to overwrite any files available under the account privileges of the running process.
Details
As part of static analysis, iOS MobSF supports loading and parsing statically linked libraries .a. When parsing such archives, the code extracts the embedded objects to the file system in the working directory of the analysis. The problem is that the current implementation does not prohibit absolute file names inside .a. If an archive item has a name like /abs/path/to/file, the resulting path is constructed as Path(dst) /name; for absolute paths, this leads to a complete substitution of the destination directory: writing occurs directly to the specified absolute directory. the path (outside the working directory).
Thus, an authenticated user who uploaded a specially prepared .a, can write arbitrary files to any directory writable by the user of the MobSF process (for example, /tmp, neighboring directories inside ~/.MobSF, etc.).
The key reason is that checking the "sliding" paths only takes into account the presence of .. (relative traversal), but does not take into account the absoluteness of the name and does not compare the normalized target path with the root directory of the extraction.
What exactly is vulnerable:
mobsf/StaticAnalyzer/views/common/shared_func.py
Function for extracting objects from .a — ar_extract
def ar_extract(checksum, src, dst):
"""Extract AR archive."""
...
ar = arpy.Archive(src)
ar.read_all_headers()
for a, val in ar.archived_files.items():
# Handle archive slip attacks
filtered = a.decode('utf-8', 'ignore')
if is_path_traversal(filtered):
msg = f'Zip slip detected. skipped extracting {filtered}'
logger.warning(msg)
append_scan_status(checksum, msg)
continue
out = Path(dst) / filtered
out.write_bytes(val.read())
- The “slip” check is limited to is_path_traversal(filtered), which looks only for traversal patterns like
..,%2e%2e,%252e. - Therefore, if the .a archive contains a member named '/tmp/pwned.txt', MobSF will write it to
/tmp/pwned.txt, outside the intended working directory.
ar_extract is called from: mobsf/StaticAnalyzer/views/common/a.py
def extract_n_get_files(checksum, src, dst):
dst = Path(dst) / 'static_objects'
dst.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
ar_extract(checksum, src, dst.as_posix())
The expectation is that extraction happens only under the static_objects subdirectory, but absolute file names inside the .a break this assumption by directing writes outside that directory.
Attack Scenario
- The attacker creates a valid AR archive.a, in which the name of one of the members is the absolute path (as an example) /home/mobsf/.MobSF/db.sqlite3. This is done by the standard AR (GNU long filename table) mechanism.
- It downloads this one via the web interface or the Static library loading API
.ain MobSF. - During the analysis, MobSF extracts the contents: due to the absolute name, the resulting path becomes /home/mobsf/.MobSF/db.sqlite3, and the file is created/overwritten outside the working directory.
- In our case, the database file was overwritten, which caused MobSF to malfunction.
PoC
-
Using the script, create a file with the payload. In the example, this is "/home/mobsf/.MobSF/db.sqlite3"
<img width="786" height="342" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b7aee5c-6938-45cc-b668-9ad19f48c2c5" /> -
Connect to the container and verify that the db.sqlite3 file is a database. The scan has not been performed yet.
<img width="2535" height="1507" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0cc92da7-91c0-453f-b1ed-080c9cfaa7f1" /> -
Upload the file for scanning and then update the page to get a server error.
<img width="2559" height="1476" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5b84ace-b853-46ad-9e2e-afad59ed058a" /> -
Check the file structure after scanning and see that the file has been overwritten.
<img width="797" height="213" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/758ba3da-ae25-4c8d-bd8b-932573ca2306" /> -
There is a database error in the MobSF log.
<img width="1724" height="1476" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd4211b1-2896-45e0-9934-9425b6035f2a" />
Impact
- Arbitrary writing/overwriting of files within the rights of the MobSF process (for example, /tmp, directories with analysis results, logs).
- Distortion of analysis results (substitution of artifacts) and undermining the integrity of reports.
- Implementation of a system malfunction (overwriting the db.sqlite3 file).
- Compromise of the UI (if you have write rights to statics/templates): Stored XSS by overwriting the plug-in.js/template.
- Potential escalation of risks with lax configuration of containers/rights (for example, writing to system paths inside the container if the process is running with excessive privileges).
Mitigation
Reject absolute paths and normalize before writing.
Please, assign all credits to Vasily Leshchenko (Solar AppSec)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | mobsf | all versions | 4.4.1pip install --upgrade 'mobsf==4.4.1' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mobsf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mobsf to 4.4.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-58162 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-58162 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-58162. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-58162 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-58162 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.