CVE-2025-54994 — @akoskm/create-mcp-server…
Fix: akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio@48c26bbCVE-2025-54994 is a OS Command Injection vulnerability in @akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio. A fix is available for @akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio — see the affected versions and patch details below.
@akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio has Command Injection in MCP Server due to unsafe `exec` API
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-54994.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdionpmDescription
Command Injection in MCP Server
The MCP Server at https://github.com/akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio is written in a way that is vulnerable to command injection vulnerability attacks as part of some of its MCP Server tool definition and implementation.
Vulnerable tool
The MCP Server exposes the tool which-app-on-port which relies on Node.js child process API exec which is an unsafe and vulnerable API if concatenated with untrusted user input.
Vulnerable line of code: https://github.com/akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio/blob/main/src/index.ts#L24-L40
server.tool("which-app-on-port", { port: z.number() }, async ({ port }) => {
const result = await new Promise<ProcessInfo>((resolve, reject) => {
exec(`lsof -t -i tcp:${port}`, (error, pidStdout) => {
if (error) {
reject(error);
return;
}
const pid = pidStdout.trim();
exec(`ps -p ${pid} -o comm=`, (error, stdout) => {
if (error) {
reject(error);
return;
}
resolve({ command: stdout.trim(), pid });
});
});
});
Exploitation
When LLMs are tricked through prompt injection (and other techniques and attack vectors) to call the tool with input that uses special shell characters such as ; rm -rf /tmp;# (be careful actually executing this payload) and other payload variations, the full command-line text will be interepted by the shell and result in other commands except of ps executing on the host running the MCP Server.
Reference example from prior security research on this topic:

Impact
User initiated and remote command injection on a running MCP Server.
Recommendation
- Don't use
exec. UseexecFileinstead, which pins the command and provides the arguments as array elements. - If the user input is not a command-line flag, use the
--notation to terminate command and command-line flag, and indicate that the text after the--double dash notation is benign value.
References and Prior work
- Exploiting MCP Servers Vulnerable to Command Injection
- Liran's Node.js Secure Coding: Defending Against Command Injection Vulnerabilities
Disclosed by Liran Tal
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio | all versions | 0.0.13npm install @akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio@0.0.13 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @akoskm/create-mcp-server-stdio to 0.0.13 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-54994 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-54994 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-54994. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-54994 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-54994 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.